Nicolaus von Below was with Hitler for 8 years as Luftwaffe Adjutant. He was close to Hitler during these years and has first-hand information on many happenings of the period. This book is different from all others I have read in that it portrays Hitler quite favourably. In that sense, would say it is brave, though obviously it overlooks a lot of what the world has come to know of Hitler’s atrocities.
Nicolaus von Below always wanted to be a soldier. He rose through the ranks and when Hitler's Adjutant was killed in an accident, Goering asked to meet him and wanted confirmation of his full loyalty. A fairly detailed account of key incidents and Hitler’s decision making since he started working with him follows in the book. He mentions that Hitler was very hard working, an insomniac who worked till early hours of the morning. He had varied interests – especially music. He could talk on a variety of subjects with others and listened carefully. In contrast to the general assumption, I had made that he would have had a dictatorial style, as per Below, he was polite with others, debated matters on merit and in detail, sought to build consensus and convince others, and issued commands only in the last year of the war. As regards Hitler’s invasion of Poland, Below almost entirely lays the blame on an intransigent Poland & Britian. Hitler’s interest was primarily in Danzig and the Polish corridor which he regards as a legitimate demand (and he says almost all in Germany thought so as well, that the Versailles treaty was grossly unfair in this respect). The press was also reporting the ill treatment of German minorities in Poland, with many fleeing. Hitler offered to negotiate but a belligerent Poland declined, emboldened by a pact they had signed with Britain. He goes on to mention that Hitler received a very popular welcome in Danzig. Below says that Hitler did not want to go to war with Britian and thought negotiations were possible once Germany’s strength was realized – for instance with a swift defeat of France. Though he had entered into a pact with Soviet Union, Hitler considered them unreliable and felt he would have no choice but to go to war at some point of time. There are details of Hitler’s attack on rest of Europe, Britain and the Soviet Union.
By 1942, the doubters on whether Germany would win went up significantly, but Below says most people still believed Hitler, a great man, who had restored Germany's stature would find a way to maintain the Reich. Below was in the room when a bomb went off in the room, plotted by Stauffenberg. He refers to the 13-14 Feb 1945, USAAF and RAF bombing of Dresden as appalling where between 135,000 to 300,000 civilians were killed (a Wikipedia article has a number of 25,000). This was an incident I did not know much about and read up later. Germany’s last hopes were on the V2 bombers and new age aircraft but everyone realized it was too late with the allies having made their landing. Eva Braun arrived at the bunker in Mar 1945, and Below compliments her for her composure and maturity. As Hitler and Eva Braun decide to end their lives, the mood was sombre, and Below carefully refers to Hitler as a great man, not morally, but as a political revolutionary. Below sought permission to leave the bunker and Hitler agreed and wished him luck. The notes at the end mention his imprisonment in 1946, and he was released in 1948.
This book largely reads like a war diary, viewed from a German perspective. It humanizes Hitler, which is brave of the author, but obviously controversial (Below does not attempt to justify all of Hitler’s actions though). In multiple instances he refers to Hitler as a pleasant person, calm and open-minded. At the same time, the question is also how honest Below has been. He denies any knowledge of the concentration camps (though he claims knowledge of all else), which only finds sketchy mention, and says all he knew was Jews being asked to self-identify themselves. There is a detached view he takes of the wars and violence Hitler initiated with no reference to the suffering which ensued.
The interesting parts of the book are the personal details the author provides, and his perspective of various matters (such as the Danzig/Polish corridor, Dresden bombing etc) which I suppose might have been typical views in Germany at that time. The moral question of Hitler’s views and actions is largely unexplored and is the most disappointing aspect of the book.
Thanks to Netgalley, the publisher and author for a free electronic review copy.