I definitely struggled a bit with this one, trying to come to terms with literary merit vs. the author's biography. I enjoyed most of the writing collected here, and Bukowski does an amazing job of capturing the seedy underbelly of LA and those who inhabit it, in a way that completely expresses the everyday banality and suffering of that life. And it's refreshing to read a writer who didn't pen his poems from an ivory tower (psychologically or in terms of his physical circumstances). His writing is crude sometimes but every word feels like it was placed with intent.
The editor did an amazing job of compiling this collection. It reflects the author's often strange, sad, despicable life. This was the first collection of Bukowski that I've read. Before this I'd only read a few of his poems (such as "the bluebird," collected here on pg. 496). My general experience with him has been that he's somewhat romanticized as a rebellious literary figure of heroic proportion, and I guess that's the part that I just don't understand, after reading this chronological compilation of his [semi]auto-biographical poems and stories. I think Bukowski wrote some great things and he recorded his own human experience, which was of the sort that generally isn't widely or truthfully told with any sort of emotional depth. He gives voice to the fucked-up masses. But he was also an alcoholic, a womanizer, and an abuser, and writes about these experiences (and his victims) quite unrepentantly most of the time, which is where I become puzzled by the reverence he commands among some circles. You can't revere the man as a genius and also, secondarily, condemn his behavior (which, those who worship him don't usually do anyway). The very content of his work was made possible by that behavior. At the very least, that needs to be acknowledged.
It sounds like throughout his life, Bukowski was with a number of women who were artists...I think it would be really interesting to see a collection that places their work beside his, to see the creative output of these women, who are portrayed as such fleeting objects of desire (or confusion) in his work. I don't know if such a collection could ever exist. But throughout the stories and poems, I found myself wishing for a fuller picture of many of these women. Some of them seemed to impact him deeply, but we get only a superficial sense of who they were as individuals.
Anyway, I don't have any answers for reconciling the man and his work, though now that I'm a bit more familiar with his writing I'm better prepared to raise a critical eyebrow at anyone who praises him as some sort of nihilist hero.
One of the poems I particularly enjoyed:
air and light and time and space (pg. 411)
"--you know, I've either had a family, a job, something
has always been in the
way
but now
I've sold my house, I've found this
place, a large studio, you should see the space and
the light.
for the first time in my life I'm going to have a place and the time to
create."
no baby, if you're going to create
you're going to create
whether you work
16 hours a day in a coal mine
or
you're going to create in a small room with 3 children
while you're on
welfare,
you're going to create with part of your mind and your
body blown
away,
you're going to create blind
crippled
demented,
you're going to create with a cat crawling up your
back while
the whole city trembles in earthquake, bombardment,
flood and fire.
baby, air and light and time and space
have nothing to do with it
and don't create anything
except maybe a longer life to find
new excuses
for.