What do you think?
Rate this book


256 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1965
When I began this novel, I secretly decided that, though I would exercise a strict selection of the facts to write down, be they "fictional" facts or "true" facts taken from newspapers or directly observed events from my own life, once I had written something down I would neither edit nor censor it (myself). The novel must be like a plum cake: while baking a plum cake or after it is baked one does not remove a raisin or a nut just because one doesn't approve of the way it has occupied a choice site or moved to close to another raisin or nut" (p. 93)At the center of the novel is William Demby himself, living in Rome, writing a novel about Doris, who is the mistress of a Italian Count (and of Demby himself). And, as noted in the quote above, the novel is mish-mash of “fictional” facts and “true” facts. William Demby – in the novel – reads numerous daily periodicals every day, and the novel is peppered with headlines and quotes from – what I can only assume are – actual papers from the time. At time the quotes and background noise overwhelm the text itself, as the ongoing worldwide crises encroach and overpower the simple story that Demby is attempting to tell.
"...I tell P. that I am writing a novel and that we are discussing how the novel should end, and that this conversation about how the novel shall end is a central theme of the third chapter" (p. 39, third chapter, after a discussion about how the novel should end)The novel is also interested in the act of writing the novel itself, and considerable time is devoted to discussing the composition of the novel, as well as the influence of the act of writing on relationships when the “subject” is aware of the ongoing writing - William is compared to both a vampire and an undertaker by Doris, and each comparison has its own weight and validity. At times the “real world” and the “novel world” overlap – as when William realizes that he has based the character of Doris (who, as far as I can tell, was an actual person) on another woman that he knew (Laura) – so not only does the real inform and encroach on the fictional, but the real encroaches on the real itself and the overlap feeds the fiction.
...the theory of cubistic time I am so recklessly fooling around with" (p. 40)where the past and the present (and the future) all swim and wash together and recollections intermingle with present action, and yet, they are at the same time informed – and acknowledged – by “present-day” William Demby who is writing the novel from his position of future omniscience.