Alan Clayson is possibly the most erudite and most infuriating writer on pop music there is, and his 2001 bio of George Harrison is the epitome of these aspects of his work. Why do I say this? Well, it would be very hard if not impossible to find anyone else who is so immersed in the culture (maybe it should be the demi-monde) of British sixties pop music and its attendant reflections of and implications for contemporary culture. He is able to tease out juxtapositions, historical contextualisations and assess the merits and values of an obscure album track by a Merseybeat band as it expresses a reinterpretation of a similarly obscure early skiffle or rock track, pepper his observations with humour and semi-faux intellectualism, and give the reader pause to think that maybe one can only understand the Beatles and George Harrison through these prisms.
Now I'm all for complex, nuanced and elaborate examinations of life, of history, of culture. I'm also a fan of British sixties pop music in general, and when Clayson talks about the Hollies, Dave Dee, Dozy, Beaky, Mick & Tich, or The Troggs my ears prick up a bit. However in this (at times) convoluted bio of George Clayson over-eggs the literary pudding so much it becomes almost indigestible. There are times when all the reader needs or wants is a clear and succinct summary of specific events, relationships and other aspects of Harrison's life. Unfortunately Clayson does get into a 'can't see the forest for the trees' exercise time and time again, to the detriment of what fundamentally should be a great read.
Hopefully these criticisms aren't too harsh, as I still believe that this is a significant achievement in Beatles related literature. Clayson may not have the advantages (or disadvantages) of writing an approved biography, with all the attendant benefits and dilemmas. However he marshals a significant quantity of information about his subject. The extent to which this material is trawled from newspaper articles and other similar documents is at times a concern, however they aren't thrown in haphazardly. His citations are relevant, informative and what they lack in Harrison approval they make up for in being more often than not his own words.
Clayson also creates a personification of Harrison that is neither hero worship nor scandal sheet expose. George is both a curmudgeon and a patient man, a man who luckily ended up in the midst of the greatest pop phenomena in history and who also was at its heart through his own actions. This book reminds one that Harrison was more than the sum of 'the quiet one' or 'the Krishna chanting guy'.
Clayson is possibly at his best exploring Harrison's life outside of his years immersed in playing for and with the Beatles. Looking at Harrison's childhood, his marriage to Patti Boyd, his relationships with Ravi Shankar, Eric Clapton, his artistic and commercial problems during the solo years; these are the chapters and themes where Clayson thrives. Personally I was happy to see plenty of space and considered examination given of George's years engaged with Handmade Films, and with the Travelling Wilburys.
In summary this is a complicated, albeit times over-written biography of George Harrison. I would recommend it to anyone who is interested in Harrison and/or the Beatles. However it is not the final word of the subject, and there must be more straightfoward, less obtuse works of biographical prose out there about George.