This book gave an overview and explanation of Chinese history, beginning with the century of humiliation and focusing most closely on the period 1949 onwards, when WW2 finished and the communists won the civil war.
This book was more of a high-level summary than I was expecting, being quite short overall. As such, it was more surface level than what I was hoping for. As such, I think its better for people who really know very little about China. That being said, it still helped understand how some trends have shaped China today. In particular, the idea of nationalism and the rejuvenation of a once great civilisation are key drivers of China politically. The method with which these goals are achieved is more flexible, whether it be Maoist communism, socialism with chinese characteristics, or whatever comes in the future. One of the other key ideas was the reliance on economic growth by the Party to maintain their legitimacy and keep the people happy. The question raised is how a nation that has developed, and where growth slows, will reckon with living under a one-party system. The party seems to think that the response is, once again, nationalism, as least in the eyes of the author. I was already familiar with this concept, but a different angle on it that I hadn't considered is: For its entire history the Party has been in control of a country that feels it is less than it should be - fragmented, poor, suffering, exploited etc. As such, the vision of China as a united, properous nation has always been key to the political identity of China - a goal that has animated and driven the country to great success. This effort has also been central to the purpose and legitimacy of the Party. This is in contrast to other countries such as the US which has been prosperous and powerful for a long time and wants to maintain what it has, or suffers from feelings of decay with no hope of regaining past glories, examples being in Europe. The question for China is what will happen once that motivating vision of the future becomes a reality? Where to next? This idea was new to me, so the book was worth reading for that reason, as well as the additional level of detail I didn't know previously. The book did a good job of being neutral/balanced, rather than being a highly politicised or slanted view, which was nice. The glossary of recommended further reading is also a nice addition.