This was probably the most bonkers book I've ever read. BONK. ERS.
SPOILERS
*Also content warning for discussion of paedophilia and abuse*
A ghost writer (Joely) who's husband (Callum) has just left her for her best friend, taking their teenage daughter (Holly) with him, takes a job ghost writing a memoir for a reclusive author who lives in a spooky old house. Ok I thought this is a gothic suspense which could be fun, I go with it even though I thought it was odd Joely was leaving Holly at a time when she'd surely be devastated at her parent's separation (well she should be but Holly seems to be taking it all strangely in stride). Anyhoo Joely gets a ride to her new assignment from a friend (Andee), and we get a whole bunch of Andee's backstory for no reason that I can see. I have to assume Andee has a book written about her somewhere...but that has nothing to do with this story and adding her details in was clunky and distracting. Did we need to know about her boyfriend who appears in only one scene? Did we need to know that they are both vegetarians? So is Joely by the way and the reclusive author, because they 'care about the planet'. Preach much? I KNOW the meat industry is problematic but there are lots of reasons (including financial necessity) that people can't always be vegetarians I don't think we needed to accuse meat eaters of all 'not caring about the planet'.
Anyway, that's a small niggle compared to the book's biggest moral issue.
So Joely gets to the house and the recluse (Freda) is odd, bordering on rude. Then she starts telling 'her' story and it's about a 15yr old girl who 'has an affair' with her 25 yr old music teacher back in the 60s. I use quotes because this terminology that it was an 'affair' continues throughout the book. I know times were different in the 60s but it is never acknowledged that a 15yr old can't have an 'affair' with her teacher, this relationship is abusive and illegal. So the story goes on and I am distinctly uncomfortable with the details. The memoir sections are written like amateur porn and I kept thinking THIS IS ABOUT A 15YR OLD GIRL. THIS IS HER TEACHER. It was like the author was tyring to impress upon the reader how sexy and magical this affair was. I was honestly disturbed and thought about quitting the book but I continued because I figured this had to be going somewhere meaningful...I don't know like maybe an acknowledgment of the wrongness of it all. At least. Or a study of how insidious grooming is.
But no. Freda keeps asking Joely what she thinks of the young her, inviting her to join in a sick kind of slut shaming. Joely doesn't object to this even though she HAS A 15YR OLD HERSELF, the two of them discuss this 'affair' from both sides, constantly representing the student as a seducer and the teacher as a 'man of honour' who 'couldn't resist her'. The student is referred to as 'a Lolita' at one point, the way Lolita is often referred to erroneously as some kind of seductress and not a child who is exploited by a middle aged man. Lolita is, like, NOT A LOVE STORY ffs.
So on it goes like this until it turns out that the story Freda is telling isn't hers at all, but the story of another woman who had an affair with her teacher... *drumroll* and that woman is JOELY'S MOTHER. Freda has brought Joely to her dungeon-like house to tell her that her mother screwed her teacher and her brother is only her half brother because the teacher is her brother's father and her brother's father was FREDA'S BROTHER. And then Freda LOCKS JOELY IN A TOWER WITHOUT FOOD and disappears to confront Freda's mother (Marianne) because she ruined her brother's life 50 years ago.
It's as effed up as it sounds.
Freda has for years blamed Marianne for her brother (David, the paedo teacher) committing suicide in prison. Ya know, because his 'affair' with his 15yr old student was discovered and he was rightly charged with rape and sent to goal, couldn't take how he was treated in there and ultimately topped himself. All this was Marianne's fault because she should have defended David and told the authorities that David 'never raped her', not actually, only in the 'technical sense'.
Hun. The technical sense is still rape, and even if Marianne had defended him to the police he still would have been charged, so how is it her fault? But Freda keeps harping on this idea that David 'never raped' Marianne so should not have been punished in any way and that Marianne 'lied'. Marianne NEVER lied. Her teacher raped her. I'll be clear, Marianne 'consented', she was in love with David (or 'Sir' as he is referred to throughout, like this is an ageplay BDSM novel), but that does not make it ok that David had sex with her. Much is made about the fact Marianne was 'almost sixteen' when the 'affair' took place. But as the old saying goes, almost doesn't count. If he was in love with her he should have waited until she was legally of age to consent to sex. The dick doesn't fall off if it's not attended to by the object of its desire. Patience is a virtue. This 'couldn't help it' crap is a lie rapists tell to excuse their utter disregard for the emotional and physical safety of women.
But of course, this not-yet-fully-formed woman was irresistible and that is somehow ON HER and not on him to keep his dick in his pants, the older person in a position of authority. BULL. SHIT.
As I'm writing this I'm still beyond stunned that this is a published novel that seems to have no self awareness of how utterly wrong and offensive it is. Can you imagine an abuse survivor stumbling upon this book and reading it only to discover the whole thing serves as a defense of paedophilia? Sorry *hebephilia* as Freda calls it, attraction to girls between 11 and 15, which we are supposed to surmise, I think, is not 'as bad' as 'actual' paedophilia. After all, that little slut 15yr old Marianne knew what she was doing *side eye*. I can't even. There are even love letters at the end of the book, from David in prison to Marianne like this is the loviest love affair of all time. VOMIT.
The book just devolves into farce by the end. After locking Joely in a tower to die and acting all menacing toward Marianne AND Holly, Freda is somehow forgiven as though she was just having a bit of a moment. She never intended to leave Joely in the tower for more than a day, she explains, leaving out the detail that she sent her housekeeper away on holidays so even she wouldn't discover Joely. Oh no, silly Freda she's a bit odd isn't she. No need to call the police. Not only does everyone in the book let this dangerous behaviour slide, Freda is welcomed with open arms into the family and she and Marianne become BFFs. She's dying of lymphoma you see so I guess it's all ok...? The f***. And now Freda has forgiven Marianne for her 'lies' even though she still reveres her brother as though he never set a foot wrong in his life? WHAAAAATTT.
And I haven't even gotten onto Callum yet. Callum, who had an affair with Joely's best friend and went to live with her realises he made a mistake and Joely takes him back because it was obvious he was manipulated by that other woman and anyway, Joely slept with someone on a drunken night out and never confessed it. That was what led to her 'turning away' from Callum, sexually speaking, and practically FORCING him to stick his penis in another vagina. Because men, they really can't help themselves and all women are sluts who are at fault for all their wrong doings. The internalised misogyny is strong in this one.
And AND nobody ever seems very concerned about where Holly is even though she is only 15. Freda is out on the loose and they're all like, 'oh she's probably at her friend's house', like don't you want to know for sure??? My daughter is 15. You can bet if there was a mad woman running around threatening my family she would not be out of my sight. Even if there WASN'T a mad woman, I always know where she is and I WOULD NOT BE COOL if she just...didn't come home. WORST. PARENTS. EVER. There's even a twist at the end where Holly has a new boyfriend and he's seventeen. MY KID CAN'T HAVE A SEVENTEEN YEAR OLD BOYFRIEND ARE YOU MAD??? So the book even treats Holly like a grown woman who can date whomever she wants... Holly is jailbait too I guess. Yuck.
I've never 1 starred a book on here before. Like ever. And my policy in the past has been to pretty much say nothing if I hated a book. But I don't ever want to forget that I read this implausible rape apology of a book or forget the name of the author who penned it. I can only conclude this author absolutely detests women so I want to steer clear of her forever and ever and ever, Amen.