What do you think?
Rate this book


468 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 2020
Edgar Rice Burroughs died over 73 years ago, yet new books with his immortal heroes are still being published. Here, his most popular protagonists, Tarzan and John Carter meet for the first time, although not for the first time. That is, these two mighty heroes have met many times before, in comics (most of which have been officially licensed), in fan fiction, in professional pastiche, and so on. Yet, each time they meet, they seem to have lost all memory of ever having seen each other before.
Burroughs himself considered letting Tarzan and Carter meet in a book, but wisely chose not to, realising that it is very difficult to find a balance between two such powerful heroes. Will Murray writes in his afterword to Tarzan, Conqueror of Mars, that "I believed I had the solution to the problem." And then he goes on to prove that Burroughs was perfectly right from the beginning. Because one of the problems of this book is that Tarzan simply outshines Carter at every turn. Although this is probably reasonable, it turns Carter into a second-rate hero, a role which suits him astonishingly poorly.
Another problem is that Carter was always, in Burroughs' books, the lone hero. Even when he had become Warlord, he used to go out on adventure all by himself. And if he ever acted as a leader of men, it was only when he was a background character, leading the cavalry to save the day at the end of the story. In Murray's tale, his role is a completely new one. Here, he orders people around in one half-cooked plan after another in his cat-and-mouse game against Tarzan. The whole thing quickly becomes tiresome, and Carter is superbly ill-suited in this role.
But the main problem is neither this, nor a good number of minor factual errors (e.g. the thoats are sometimes said to be six-legged, sometimes ten-legged, but never the correct eight), nor the fact that the tempo is way too slow, making the whole thing exceedingly boring. No, the main problem with this novel is that there is no proper conflict. Sure Tarzan wants to go home, and John Carter happens to stand in his way, but through the second half of the novel, I keep expecting the real conflict to show up. I mean, where is the mad scientist trying to take over the planet? Where is the evil jeddak with his schemes of conquest? Where are all the damsels in distress that need rescuing? Where are the scheming priests of yet another false religion? We see nothing of this, and so the plot trudges along, just like Tarzan's zitidar, taking us toward the inevitable conclusion, one slow step at a time.
So, are there no redeeming factors in this novel? Sure, Murray manages to write a fairly convincing Tarzan, and through the first half of the novel, before John Carter has shown up on the scene, I allow myself to enjoy Tarzan's natural air of superiority. This is the way the ape lord should be, even though the tempo is still too slow.
The bottom line is, I think, that the world does not really need all these new "ERB novels". Burroughs' legacy rests safely in the novels he wrote. What others do with his characters is pretty inconsequential, and as long as it is no better than this, we could do without it.