I think I've maybe given one other book a rating of 1-star. I'm not sure, but I know it's rare. I also realized that I started reading it exactly a month ago. A story this short took me a literal month to get through, and as I ponder why, I realize it's because almost every page of it felt like a chore for me.
I rarely give 1-star reviews because if I'm not enjoying a book I tend to file it away into my unfinished/couldn't get into folder. So why did I finish this one? I'm honestly not sure. Maybe I kept hoping it would get better. One chapter was actually incredibly well written and I was stoked that the writing and pacing were going to pick up. They didn't.
Ultimately, I think I finished it purely as an exercise in resilience. Yet it took a while month.
Reading many of the other reviews makes me wonder if we read the same book. Interesting characters? Sort of. Great pacing? No. Solid story? Nope. Satisfying ending? Again, no.
Not all books are for everyone. This one was definitely not for me. The basic idea could have been something incredible. If it had been longer and gone through a few more drafts, I wonder if it would have been something I liked. I wonder...
As it stands, the story was erratic, the descriptions unnecessarily long for superfluous things and often too short for things that seemed to matter, and in the end of felt like it was rushed.
Here's something I find interesting, though. It's really odd. I very much did not like this book, and I think that's pretty clear. Yet I find myself curious about the author's other works, and will be placing some of them on my reading list. Maybe this just want my cup of tea.
I won't recommend this book, but I'm very much in the minority it seems. Unless the author has a lot of friends here, then quite a few people really liked it and picking it up for yourself won't hurt a thing. You can always file it away if it doesn't suit you.