What do you think?
Rate this book
Paulus. Een biografie
Een baanbrekende nieuwe biografie van misschien wel de invloedrijkste schrijver in de geschiedenis van de mensheid.
***
Slechts weinig geschriften uit oude wereld zijn even boeiend als de brieven van Paulus. Je kunt er niet omheen, je moet er iets van vinden. Of je het nu met Paulus eens bent of niet – of je hemzelf nu mag of niet – zijn brieven zijn en blijven persoonlijk en intens. Ze zijn ontroerend en uitdagend, elke zin voegt iets toe en ze vervelen nooit. Maar wie was Paulus zelf? Hoe kon hij zulke brieven schrijven? Hoe kon iemand van wie je nooit zou verwachten dat hij apostel zou worden de oude Griekse en Romeinse wereld zo diepgaand beïnvloeden, dat wij er tot op de dag van vandaag door beïnvloed worden – of we willen of niet?
In deze nieuwe biografie gaat Wright op zoek naar de man achter de brieven.
***
Wie was Paulus, de grote apostel? Wat dreef hem?
In deze magistrale biografie beantwoordt Tom Wright die vraag.
Wie was deze man, die de volgelingen van Jezus eerst opjoeg en doodde en vervolgens één van hen werd – en die daarmee het gezicht van onze cultuur beslissend beïnvloedde?
Wright biedt een toegankelijke en diepgaande verkenning van het menselijke en intellectuele drama dat Paulus maakte tot wie hij was. Zo helpt hij ons om de geschriften, gedachten en ideeën van de apostel op een vernieuwende manier te begrijpen.
In het schitterende Paulus-portret op het omslag graaft Rembrandt diep in de ziel van Paulus. Tom Wrights biografie is er een even diepgaande als toegankelijk geschreven uitwerking van.
***
Slechts weinig geschriften uit oude wereld zijn even boeiend als de brieven van Paulus. Je kunt er niet omheen, je moet er iets van vinden. Of je het nu met Paulus eens bent of niet – of je hemzelf nu mag of niet – zijn brieven zijn en blijven persoonlijk en intens. Ze zijn ontroerend en uitdagend, elke zin voegt iets toe en ze vervelen nooit. Maar wie was Paulus zelf? Hoe kon hij zulke brieven schrijven? Hoe kon iemand van wie je nooit zou verwachten dat hij apostel zou worden de oude Griekse en Romeinse wereld zo diepgaand beïnvloeden, dat wij er tot op de dag van vandaag door beïnvloed worden – of we willen of niet?
In deze nieuwe biografie gaat Wright op zoek naar de man achter de brieven.
***
Wie was Paulus, de grote apostel? Wat dreef hem?
In deze magistrale biografie beantwoordt Tom Wright die vraag.
Wie was deze man, die de volgelingen van Jezus eerst opjoeg en doodde en vervolgens één van hen werd – en die daarmee het gezicht van onze cultuur beslissend beïnvloedde?
Wright biedt een toegankelijke en diepgaande verkenning van het menselijke en intellectuele drama dat Paulus maakte tot wie hij was. Zo helpt hij ons om de geschriften, gedachten en ideeën van de apostel op een vernieuwende manier te begrijpen.
In het schitterende Paulus-portret op het omslag graaft Rembrandt diep in de ziel van Paulus. Tom Wrights biografie is er een even diepgaande als toegankelijk geschreven uitwerking van.
461 pages, Hardcover
First published February 27, 2018
4146 people are currently reading
9191 people want to read
About the author
N.T. Wright
459 books2,913 followersN. T. Wright is the former Bishop of Durham in the Church of England (2003-2010) and one of the world's leading Bible scholars. He is now serving as the chair of New Testament and Early Christianity at the School of Divinity at the University of St. Andrews. He has been featured on ABC News, Dateline NBC, The Colbert Report, and Fresh Air, and he has taught New Testament studies at Cambridge, McGill, and Oxford universities. Wright is the award-winning author of Surprised by Hope, Simply Christian, The Last Word, The Challenge of Jesus, The Meaning of Jesus (coauthored with Marcus Borg), as well as the much heralded series Christian Origins and the Question of God.
He also publishes under Tom Wright.
He also publishes under Tom Wright.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 932 reviews
January 22, 2021
What a great book! Wright takes all the Bible's writings on Paul, puts the whole story in order, and then reveals it all in the larger context of what was happening in the Jewish/Roman world at the time. The result is enlightening (I've been studying Paul my whole life and I just now after reading this book feel that I have a grip on his story) and fascinating.
Sometimes as Christians we make the mistake of assuming Paul was like a replacement Jesus, a perfect man whose example we can follow to live the best Christian life (he was, after all, writing the Bible as he went!). But not only was Paul not perfect, he was bossy, cantankerous, short-tempered, depressed, and error-prone. This, of course, is exactly what we as Christians need from Paul. Not someone to mimic, but someone like us to learn from as he follows Christ. Wright illuminates this perfectly.
Sometimes as Christians we make the mistake of assuming Paul was like a replacement Jesus, a perfect man whose example we can follow to live the best Christian life (he was, after all, writing the Bible as he went!). But not only was Paul not perfect, he was bossy, cantankerous, short-tempered, depressed, and error-prone. This, of course, is exactly what we as Christians need from Paul. Not someone to mimic, but someone like us to learn from as he follows Christ. Wright illuminates this perfectly.
December 8, 2022
Perhaps that is what “holy scripture” really is - not a calm, serene list of truths to be learned or commands to be obeyed, but a jagged book that forces you to grow up in your thinking as you grapple with it.
Professor Tom Wright is one of our leading New Testament theologians, a former Bishop of Durham (but certainly not this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_J...) and now Chair of New Testament and Early Christianity at the School of Divinity at the University of St. Andrews.
His books are actually published under two different names, or perhaps brands is a better label - causing some confusion on Goodreads classification system - NT Wright for his heavier theological tomes and Tom Wright for his more entry-level books, such as the New Testament for Everyone collection. [In the US, to add to the confusion, NT Wright is used for both sets of books].
This wonderful new biography of Paul, the towering figure of the early Christian church is pitched somewhere between the two different strands of his writing, although the fact that it has come out under the Tom Wright name speaks to its wonderful accessibility. If at times - see below - it didn't answer all my questions, it certainly sent me in fruitful search of NT Wright's more detailed arguments.
Wright's focus here is to attempt a historic reconstruction of Paul's life, work and his theological developments drawing on the available sources - of course, primarily, the New Testament - but also setting this in the context of what we know of the Roman and Greek world and philosophy (Jewish and secular) within which Paul lived and worked. He takes us on a plausible account of Paul's life, consistent with Acts (allowing for Luke's requirement to condense many years of travels into a short story) and how, why and when each letter was written, struggling only, on both logistical and textual grounds, to find an obvious place for 1 Timothy and Titus.
And Wright is excellent at plunging us into the sights, smells, sounds and day-to-day reality of 1st century life, particularly emphasising that for all his brilliance - and one of Wright's key themes is that Paul taught the Church not so much what to think as how to think - that Paul was no ivory tower thinker, but a passionate, often too passionate, human being and a fiercely focused worker.
When people in churches today discuss Paul and his letters, they often think only of the man of ideas who dealt with lofty and difficult concepts, implying a world of libraries, seminar rooms, or at least the minister’s study for quiet sermon preparation. We easily forget that the author of these letters spent most of his waking hours with his sleeves rolled up, doing hard physical work in a hot climate, and that perhaps two-thirds of the conversations he had with people about Jesus and the gospel were conducted not in a place of worship or study, not even in a private home, but in a small, cramped workshop. Saul had his feet on the ground, and his hands were hardened with labor. But his head still buzzed with scripture and the news about Jesus.
[One minor bugbear in passing - while Wright's writing is generally excellent he is annoyingly overfond of analogies involving classic music, which clearly has some sort of quasi-religious significance to him]
He is keen to emphasise that this is not psychoanalysis. It is history but also, more crucially in my mind, that this is a work (my words) of deduction but not of creative imagination. So for example, he makes no attempt to guess what Paul's 'thorn' might be, but can deduce that Isaiah 49 must have been a key foundation text for Paul's view of his own role and, somewhat more speculatively, that Paul may well have been meditating on Ezekiel 1 on the road to Damascus, but that when he raised his eyes to the figure on the throne, he saw not God but instead the Lord Jesus.
Wright has had his particular, and somewhat controversial (although I think I generally agree with him), theological points to make, notably about his view of what Paul meant by justification and his view on what Paul would have meant by heaven. These are expounded in much more detail in 'NT Wright' works notably:
Paul and the Faithfulness of God which is the more theological companion to this biography
and
Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church where Wright argues Jesus's resurrection is the beginning of God's new project not to snatch people away from earth to heaven but to colonize earth with the life of heaven.
and
Justification: God's Plan & Paul's Vision - see e.g. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/bl...
A quote from another of his works (see below) What Saint Paul Really Said, links both:
Justification is not how someone becomes a Christian. It is the declaration that they have become a Christian. And the total context of this doctrine, here in Philippians 3, is that of the expectation - not of a final salvation in which the individual is abstracted from the present world, but of the final new heavens and new earth, as the Lord comes from the heavenly realm to transform the earthly.
Wright's main argument in both cases is that we often interpret Paul's teaching through the lens of the 16th Century reformers (for justification) and 19th century apocalyptic thinkers (for the end of the world view of the resurrection), rather than what Paul would have meant, and this book, while not getting into the theological detail, is excellent at setting Paul's developing theology in his 1st Century context as a faithful Jew.
The other 'charges' which Paul often faces are that he, rather than Jesus, essentially invented Christianity, that, post the road to Damascus, that he despised his own Jewish religious origins (and implicitly may therefore be responsible for the later anti-semitism that sometimes stains the Church throughout history) and also that his teaching on matters like the role of women and homosexuality has echoes in modern day misogyny and homophobia.
On the first - a view most associated with A N Wilson's Paul: The Mind of the Apostle - Wright provided a comprehensive and convincing demolition of Wilson's arguments in What Saint Paul Really Said: Was Paul of Tarsus the Real Founder of Christianity?. Here he doesn't address the issue directly, but Wright clearly sees Paul's teaching as rooted in the life and teaching of the historic Jesus, and Paul's role, in his own mind, as well as a prophet in the line of Isaiah and Ezekiel: yes, to make the first attempt in turning what Jesus had done into a coherent way of life in response, for Jew and Gentile, but not to distort the teaching of Jesus but rather directly inspired by his encounter with the resurrected Christ.
The second - of being ashamed of his Jewish origins - he addresses in much more detail here, indeed he argues precisely the opposite, that Paul's missions always started in the synagogue and that he had no concept of Christianity being a seperate or new 'religion', rather the fulfilment of the Torah and the prophets. And that Paul's key message was
He was determined to establish and maintain Jew-plus-Gentile communities, worshipping the One God in and through Jesus his son and in the power of the spirit, ahead of the catastrophe.
This is why Paul insisted, in letter after letter, on the unity of the church across traditional boundaries.
This book is, though, a little disappointing on the last aspects, which receive little coverage. From what is said, on the role of women Wright believes Paul has been misunderstood, although in a key note speech on the topic (http://ntwrightpage.com/2016/07/12/wo...) he started by apologising that today’s topic has not been an area of primary research for me. He concluded that speech:
I believe we have seriously misread the relevant passages in the New Testament, no doubt not least through a long process of assumption, tradition, and all kinds of post-biblical and sub-biblical attitudes that have crept in to Christianity. Just as I think we need radically to change our traditional pictures of the afterlife, away from the mediaeval models and back to the biblical ones, so we need radically to change our traditional pictures both of what men and women are and how they relate to one another within the church and indeed of what the Bible says on this subject. I do wonder, sometimes, if those who present radical challenges to Christianity have been all the more eager to make out that the Bible says certain things about women, as an excuse for claiming that Christianity in general is a wicked thing and we ought to abandon it. Of course, there have been plenty of Christians who have given outsiders plenty of chances to make that sort of comment. But perhaps in our generation we have an opportunity to take a large step back in the right direction.
By contrast, Wright emphasis many times that sexual morality was a key cornerstone of Paul's teaching, and something that marked-out the early Christian churches inspired by his example. Here he claims to be even less of an expert but it is clear from conversation elsewhere that Wright doesn't believe Paul has a case to answer on his view of homosexuality, as he believes even life-long monogamous same-sex relations are not compatible with God's plan (http://ntwrightpage.com/2016/07/12/co... or https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/fir...). I can not help but feel he is on the wrong side of history here on gay marriage - but Wright has his rebuttal prepared for me:
All the press is on-side, most of Parliament’s on-side, and people are saying—get this—that unless you support this, you’re on the wrong side of history. Excuse me. Did you see University Challenge last night? There was a nice question: Somebody said, who was it who said in 1956, “History is on our side and we will bury you”? One of the contestants got the answer right: It was Nikita Khrushchev. When people claim, “We’re going with the flow of history,” that’s just a rhetorical smokescreen. So, that’s where I am.
But I don't want to end on a negative note, so I will end instead with a refrain that runs through Wright's account - 1 Corinthians 8:6 which, in Wright's account, becomes Paul's version of the Shema (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shema_Y...), "Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.” Paul's version - which Wright has him repeating as he is lead to his likely execution (as Wright admits, frustratingly we actually know very little of Paul's ultimate fate) becomes, preserving the integrity of the one God, but allowing for Jesus as Lord:
For us there is one God, the father,
From whom are all things, and we live to him and for him;
And one Lord, Jesus the Messiah,
Through whom are all things, and we live through him.
Professor Tom Wright is one of our leading New Testament theologians, a former Bishop of Durham (but certainly not this one https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/David_J...) and now Chair of New Testament and Early Christianity at the School of Divinity at the University of St. Andrews.
His books are actually published under two different names, or perhaps brands is a better label - causing some confusion on Goodreads classification system - NT Wright for his heavier theological tomes and Tom Wright for his more entry-level books, such as the New Testament for Everyone collection. [In the US, to add to the confusion, NT Wright is used for both sets of books].
This wonderful new biography of Paul, the towering figure of the early Christian church is pitched somewhere between the two different strands of his writing, although the fact that it has come out under the Tom Wright name speaks to its wonderful accessibility. If at times - see below - it didn't answer all my questions, it certainly sent me in fruitful search of NT Wright's more detailed arguments.
Wright's focus here is to attempt a historic reconstruction of Paul's life, work and his theological developments drawing on the available sources - of course, primarily, the New Testament - but also setting this in the context of what we know of the Roman and Greek world and philosophy (Jewish and secular) within which Paul lived and worked. He takes us on a plausible account of Paul's life, consistent with Acts (allowing for Luke's requirement to condense many years of travels into a short story) and how, why and when each letter was written, struggling only, on both logistical and textual grounds, to find an obvious place for 1 Timothy and Titus.
And Wright is excellent at plunging us into the sights, smells, sounds and day-to-day reality of 1st century life, particularly emphasising that for all his brilliance - and one of Wright's key themes is that Paul taught the Church not so much what to think as how to think - that Paul was no ivory tower thinker, but a passionate, often too passionate, human being and a fiercely focused worker.
When people in churches today discuss Paul and his letters, they often think only of the man of ideas who dealt with lofty and difficult concepts, implying a world of libraries, seminar rooms, or at least the minister’s study for quiet sermon preparation. We easily forget that the author of these letters spent most of his waking hours with his sleeves rolled up, doing hard physical work in a hot climate, and that perhaps two-thirds of the conversations he had with people about Jesus and the gospel were conducted not in a place of worship or study, not even in a private home, but in a small, cramped workshop. Saul had his feet on the ground, and his hands were hardened with labor. But his head still buzzed with scripture and the news about Jesus.
[One minor bugbear in passing - while Wright's writing is generally excellent he is annoyingly overfond of analogies involving classic music, which clearly has some sort of quasi-religious significance to him]
He is keen to emphasise that this is not psychoanalysis. It is history but also, more crucially in my mind, that this is a work (my words) of deduction but not of creative imagination. So for example, he makes no attempt to guess what Paul's 'thorn' might be, but can deduce that Isaiah 49 must have been a key foundation text for Paul's view of his own role and, somewhat more speculatively, that Paul may well have been meditating on Ezekiel 1 on the road to Damascus, but that when he raised his eyes to the figure on the throne, he saw not God but instead the Lord Jesus.
Wright has had his particular, and somewhat controversial (although I think I generally agree with him), theological points to make, notably about his view of what Paul meant by justification and his view on what Paul would have meant by heaven. These are expounded in much more detail in 'NT Wright' works notably:
Paul and the Faithfulness of God which is the more theological companion to this biography
and
Surprised by Hope: Rethinking Heaven, the Resurrection, and the Mission of the Church where Wright argues Jesus's resurrection is the beginning of God's new project not to snatch people away from earth to heaven but to colonize earth with the life of heaven.
and
Justification: God's Plan & Paul's Vision - see e.g. https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/bl...
A quote from another of his works (see below) What Saint Paul Really Said, links both:
Justification is not how someone becomes a Christian. It is the declaration that they have become a Christian. And the total context of this doctrine, here in Philippians 3, is that of the expectation - not of a final salvation in which the individual is abstracted from the present world, but of the final new heavens and new earth, as the Lord comes from the heavenly realm to transform the earthly.
Wright's main argument in both cases is that we often interpret Paul's teaching through the lens of the 16th Century reformers (for justification) and 19th century apocalyptic thinkers (for the end of the world view of the resurrection), rather than what Paul would have meant, and this book, while not getting into the theological detail, is excellent at setting Paul's developing theology in his 1st Century context as a faithful Jew.
The other 'charges' which Paul often faces are that he, rather than Jesus, essentially invented Christianity, that, post the road to Damascus, that he despised his own Jewish religious origins (and implicitly may therefore be responsible for the later anti-semitism that sometimes stains the Church throughout history) and also that his teaching on matters like the role of women and homosexuality has echoes in modern day misogyny and homophobia.
On the first - a view most associated with A N Wilson's Paul: The Mind of the Apostle - Wright provided a comprehensive and convincing demolition of Wilson's arguments in What Saint Paul Really Said: Was Paul of Tarsus the Real Founder of Christianity?. Here he doesn't address the issue directly, but Wright clearly sees Paul's teaching as rooted in the life and teaching of the historic Jesus, and Paul's role, in his own mind, as well as a prophet in the line of Isaiah and Ezekiel: yes, to make the first attempt in turning what Jesus had done into a coherent way of life in response, for Jew and Gentile, but not to distort the teaching of Jesus but rather directly inspired by his encounter with the resurrected Christ.
The second - of being ashamed of his Jewish origins - he addresses in much more detail here, indeed he argues precisely the opposite, that Paul's missions always started in the synagogue and that he had no concept of Christianity being a seperate or new 'religion', rather the fulfilment of the Torah and the prophets. And that Paul's key message was
He was determined to establish and maintain Jew-plus-Gentile communities, worshipping the One God in and through Jesus his son and in the power of the spirit, ahead of the catastrophe.
This is why Paul insisted, in letter after letter, on the unity of the church across traditional boundaries.
This book is, though, a little disappointing on the last aspects, which receive little coverage. From what is said, on the role of women Wright believes Paul has been misunderstood, although in a key note speech on the topic (http://ntwrightpage.com/2016/07/12/wo...) he started by apologising that today’s topic has not been an area of primary research for me. He concluded that speech:
I believe we have seriously misread the relevant passages in the New Testament, no doubt not least through a long process of assumption, tradition, and all kinds of post-biblical and sub-biblical attitudes that have crept in to Christianity. Just as I think we need radically to change our traditional pictures of the afterlife, away from the mediaeval models and back to the biblical ones, so we need radically to change our traditional pictures both of what men and women are and how they relate to one another within the church and indeed of what the Bible says on this subject. I do wonder, sometimes, if those who present radical challenges to Christianity have been all the more eager to make out that the Bible says certain things about women, as an excuse for claiming that Christianity in general is a wicked thing and we ought to abandon it. Of course, there have been plenty of Christians who have given outsiders plenty of chances to make that sort of comment. But perhaps in our generation we have an opportunity to take a large step back in the right direction.
By contrast, Wright emphasis many times that sexual morality was a key cornerstone of Paul's teaching, and something that marked-out the early Christian churches inspired by his example. Here he claims to be even less of an expert but it is clear from conversation elsewhere that Wright doesn't believe Paul has a case to answer on his view of homosexuality, as he believes even life-long monogamous same-sex relations are not compatible with God's plan (http://ntwrightpage.com/2016/07/12/co... or https://www.firstthings.com/blogs/fir...). I can not help but feel he is on the wrong side of history here on gay marriage - but Wright has his rebuttal prepared for me:
All the press is on-side, most of Parliament’s on-side, and people are saying—get this—that unless you support this, you’re on the wrong side of history. Excuse me. Did you see University Challenge last night? There was a nice question: Somebody said, who was it who said in 1956, “History is on our side and we will bury you”? One of the contestants got the answer right: It was Nikita Khrushchev. When people claim, “We’re going with the flow of history,” that’s just a rhetorical smokescreen. So, that’s where I am.
But I don't want to end on a negative note, so I will end instead with a refrain that runs through Wright's account - 1 Corinthians 8:6 which, in Wright's account, becomes Paul's version of the Shema (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shema_Y...), "Hear, O Israel, the Lord our God, the Lord is one.” Paul's version - which Wright has him repeating as he is lead to his likely execution (as Wright admits, frustratingly we actually know very little of Paul's ultimate fate) becomes, preserving the integrity of the one God, but allowing for Jesus as Lord:
For us there is one God, the father,
From whom are all things, and we live to him and for him;
And one Lord, Jesus the Messiah,
Through whom are all things, and we live through him.
Read
December 29, 2023N. T. Wright fluctuates between scholarly academic works and more accessible works for the lay reader. This one finds a happy medium between the two, using Wright's formidable scholarship to enrich the breezy tale of one of the most remarkable men in history.
January 1, 2021
I’ve never been the saint’s biggest fan, having grown up thinking of him as the very first ‘protestant’. Always wearing a hair shirt, particularly if there’s a whiff of sex in the air, and inclined towards misogynism. Tom Wright showed me how wrong I was.
This is a masterpiece: I saw Paul as I had never seen him before – flesh and blood like the rest of us, human, humane but no slacker or push-over. Driven by the sound and vision of his King, Jesus, on the road to Damascus which fired his cylinders for the rest of his days. This is one of the most important books I have read, this year certainly. Enlightening and faith affirming - thanks to the Saint and Bishop Tom. I will probably say more when I have had longer to reflect.
This is a masterpiece: I saw Paul as I had never seen him before – flesh and blood like the rest of us, human, humane but no slacker or push-over. Driven by the sound and vision of his King, Jesus, on the road to Damascus which fired his cylinders for the rest of his days. This is one of the most important books I have read, this year certainly. Enlightening and faith affirming - thanks to the Saint and Bishop Tom. I will probably say more when I have had longer to reflect.
March 14, 2018
I thoroughly enjoyed this biography of the Christian apostle Paul. The author does a great job of sharing the cultural context, practical implications, and life choices of Paul. I've studied the scriptures for years and I still learned some cool things about his life that I hadn't heard before. It was written with humility (acknowledging where there is uncertainty or debate) and with honesty (not pretending that every choice Paul made was correct. Great read.
October 14, 2018
Summary: Wright translates his scholarship that gives a "new account" of Paul's life into a popular biography, tracing the life and thought of the apostle through the letters he wrote and narrative of his journeys.
Over the last thirty years, perhaps no one has written more on the life and thought of the Apostle Paul than N. T. Wright, most notably his two volume Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Wright is associated with what is called "the New Perspective" on Paul. What he has done in this volume is distill his scholarship into a highly readable account of the life and thought of this apostle. Reading this, you will see some of the ways Wright casts the life of Paul in new perspective.
We see this in his portrayal of Paul's Damascus road experience. He imagines Paul possibly reflecting on the vision of Ezekiel, perhaps praying the Shema, when suddenly he gazes upward...into the face of Jesus, whose followers he has been persecuting. Wright challenges us to see that this was not a conversion to a new religion, but the shattering and transforming realization that Jesus was the fulfillment of the scriptures Paul had studied so long--that he "had been absolutely right in his devotion to Israel and the Torah, but absolutely wrong in his view of Israel's vocation and identity and even in the meaning of the Torah."
He then traces the travels of Paul from the formative years in the wilderness and Tarsus where he rethought everything in the light of Christ, and then his successive journeys taking the message of Christ into Asia Minor, then later into Europe in Philippi, Athens, and Corinth. In the Galatian controversy with Peter and his subsequent letter, we catch the first glimpse of Paul's transformed vision, where he sees both Jew and Gentile incorporated and included into a new people enjoying the blessing of Abraham's faith. It is this that explains his methodology of teaching in synagogues, and then to Gentiles who will hear him and seeking to form new communities made up of those who give allegiance to Christ, and share table fellowship.
The biography offers some of Wright's distinctive judgments on matters scholars have debated, southern versus northern theories of Galatians (he opts for south), and the origin of the prison letters, neither from Caesarea or Rome, but during an imprisonment in the latter part of his time in Ephesus. Wright explores this as a nadir of Paul's ministry, both in the experience of prison, but also in the receipt of disturbing news from Corinth from those questioning his reputation. He proposes that this accounts for the somewhat disjointed style of 2 Corinthians, written after his release. He also believes that after writing this, he penned his magnum opus to the Romans, spelling out to a church where tensions existed separating Jew and Gentile, the purpose of God to include Gentiles with Jews as heirs of the promise of the covenant to make one new people.
Throughout, Wright explores the character of this apostle, who he describes as "bossy" on the voyage to Rome, and often troublesome in jumping into the fray. Paul did not let sleeping dogs lie. But Wright also argues, that like many "angular" entrepreneurs, it was these very qualities that, on a human level accounted for the success of this apostle in establishing these new communities across the Roman empire.
The work was a delight to read on many levels, as a reflection on the career of Paul and as an exploration of the relationship of Jesus and the hope of Israel revealed in Torah and the prophets. I savored his insights into each of Paul's letters, and the vision of the church Paul articulated, that would sustain a movement long after his martyrdom, even as it continues to do so to this day.
Paul has often been maligned as a misogynist, as a heretic from his Jewish origins, and more. For others, we read him through Reformation glasses. Wright may or may not convince you otherwise, but this marvelous distillation of his scholarship will make you both think about, and hopefully rejoice in, what this apostle accomplished. And perhaps it will help you read his letters with new eyes.
Over the last thirty years, perhaps no one has written more on the life and thought of the Apostle Paul than N. T. Wright, most notably his two volume Paul and the Faithfulness of God. Wright is associated with what is called "the New Perspective" on Paul. What he has done in this volume is distill his scholarship into a highly readable account of the life and thought of this apostle. Reading this, you will see some of the ways Wright casts the life of Paul in new perspective.
We see this in his portrayal of Paul's Damascus road experience. He imagines Paul possibly reflecting on the vision of Ezekiel, perhaps praying the Shema, when suddenly he gazes upward...into the face of Jesus, whose followers he has been persecuting. Wright challenges us to see that this was not a conversion to a new religion, but the shattering and transforming realization that Jesus was the fulfillment of the scriptures Paul had studied so long--that he "had been absolutely right in his devotion to Israel and the Torah, but absolutely wrong in his view of Israel's vocation and identity and even in the meaning of the Torah."
He then traces the travels of Paul from the formative years in the wilderness and Tarsus where he rethought everything in the light of Christ, and then his successive journeys taking the message of Christ into Asia Minor, then later into Europe in Philippi, Athens, and Corinth. In the Galatian controversy with Peter and his subsequent letter, we catch the first glimpse of Paul's transformed vision, where he sees both Jew and Gentile incorporated and included into a new people enjoying the blessing of Abraham's faith. It is this that explains his methodology of teaching in synagogues, and then to Gentiles who will hear him and seeking to form new communities made up of those who give allegiance to Christ, and share table fellowship.
The biography offers some of Wright's distinctive judgments on matters scholars have debated, southern versus northern theories of Galatians (he opts for south), and the origin of the prison letters, neither from Caesarea or Rome, but during an imprisonment in the latter part of his time in Ephesus. Wright explores this as a nadir of Paul's ministry, both in the experience of prison, but also in the receipt of disturbing news from Corinth from those questioning his reputation. He proposes that this accounts for the somewhat disjointed style of 2 Corinthians, written after his release. He also believes that after writing this, he penned his magnum opus to the Romans, spelling out to a church where tensions existed separating Jew and Gentile, the purpose of God to include Gentiles with Jews as heirs of the promise of the covenant to make one new people.
Throughout, Wright explores the character of this apostle, who he describes as "bossy" on the voyage to Rome, and often troublesome in jumping into the fray. Paul did not let sleeping dogs lie. But Wright also argues, that like many "angular" entrepreneurs, it was these very qualities that, on a human level accounted for the success of this apostle in establishing these new communities across the Roman empire.
The work was a delight to read on many levels, as a reflection on the career of Paul and as an exploration of the relationship of Jesus and the hope of Israel revealed in Torah and the prophets. I savored his insights into each of Paul's letters, and the vision of the church Paul articulated, that would sustain a movement long after his martyrdom, even as it continues to do so to this day.
Paul has often been maligned as a misogynist, as a heretic from his Jewish origins, and more. For others, we read him through Reformation glasses. Wright may or may not convince you otherwise, but this marvelous distillation of his scholarship will make you both think about, and hopefully rejoice in, what this apostle accomplished. And perhaps it will help you read his letters with new eyes.
February 22, 2020
Marvelously, marvelously good from start to finish, but the last third was the best.
There are of course the usual caveats of occassional and occasionally significant disagreements with Wright. But those who have mainly heard about Wright from critics who point out where he goes wrong will be thrilled, if they will give him a chance, to see how much he gets right and how beautifully, winsomely, and confidently he goes about it.
I listened to the audiobook and loved it so much I bought a physical copy too. The narrator, James Langston, was a perfect fit for Wright's prose. I'm already ready for more from this partnership.
There are of course the usual caveats of occassional and occasionally significant disagreements with Wright. But those who have mainly heard about Wright from critics who point out where he goes wrong will be thrilled, if they will give him a chance, to see how much he gets right and how beautifully, winsomely, and confidently he goes about it.
I listened to the audiobook and loved it so much I bought a physical copy too. The narrator, James Langston, was a perfect fit for Wright's prose. I'm already ready for more from this partnership.
February 10, 2025
NT Wright is currently my favorite author. This summer I read The Day the Revolution began and I felt this book covered a lot of the same ground. Where that book was more specifically on the theology of atonement, this one was a biographical approach in putting Paul's letters into their historical context. In both books Wright does an excellent job at taking the larger biblical narrative, tying it into the historical context, and then showing us its practical relevance for us today.
One thing I did pause on was his speculation on Paul's experience in Ephesus. Wright places the prison epistles here rather than the later more commonly accepted placement in Rome. I was mostly listening to this on my commute to and from school and do wish I had a hard copy instead so that I could have slowed down here so that I could more critically analyze this theory. It is definitely something I would like to look more deeply into.
One thing I did pause on was his speculation on Paul's experience in Ephesus. Wright places the prison epistles here rather than the later more commonly accepted placement in Rome. I was mostly listening to this on my commute to and from school and do wish I had a hard copy instead so that I could have slowed down here so that I could more critically analyze this theory. It is definitely something I would like to look more deeply into.
December 30, 2023
Ugh. I wrote a whole review for this book. It’s incredible & I’d highly recommend it.
But then the Goodreads app crashed & I lost it. This app is horrible. I sure hope they fix it because it’s good when it works.
But then the Goodreads app crashed & I lost it. This app is horrible. I sure hope they fix it because it’s good when it works.
July 13, 2018
Delightful! Wright helps readers sort out all the pieces from Acts and Paul's letters to see a picture of the man, his motivations, his travels, and his life.
July 8, 2019
Really found this such a useful book in terms of providing context for the Apostle Paul's letters.
Each chapter describes his life and shows his journeys in chronological order with a map showing where he went. Also describes Paul the person including all his fallibilities as well as his strengths.
Like Tom Wright's "For Everyone" series (one on each book of the New Testament) this describes everything in very straightforward terms and relates it to its time while still being relevant to the present day so that you don't need to be a theological student to follow it. An essential reference book and highly recommended.
Each chapter describes his life and shows his journeys in chronological order with a map showing where he went. Also describes Paul the person including all his fallibilities as well as his strengths.
Like Tom Wright's "For Everyone" series (one on each book of the New Testament) this describes everything in very straightforward terms and relates it to its time while still being relevant to the present day so that you don't need to be a theological student to follow it. An essential reference book and highly recommended.
July 28, 2021
4.5/5
A very interesting and mature work presenting the life and thought of the most important Christian thinker in ancient history: the Apostle Paul. As a result of a whole research life on the figure, Tom Wright deals with confidence and—most of the time—with clarity about Paul in his historical context. Although aware of both Jewish and Roman backgrounds, Wright emphasizes—way more, one should say—the former as the matrix through which Paul is trying to read and explain the Christian faith. The second chapter, on the significance of "zeal" for the young Saul was very helpful for me. The question of change of style in some of Paul's letters (esp. from 1 to 2 Corinthians) as a result of experiences of deep suffering in Ephesus is also quite thought-provoking.
However, I still bring some important questions concerning the whole work. The main ones are:
1) It seems like Wright speculates too much about Paul's prayer life. For instance, according to Wright, the significance of Paul's conversion on the road to Damascus is directly related to the Jewish practice of prayerful meditation in key passages, especially Ezekiel 1. Although a fascinating suggestion, it has very little biblical-historical basis. No direct scriptural echo is pointed. But for Wright, relating Ezekiel 1 to the Damascus experience explains why Paul suddenly understood why the One God Creator was present in Jesus Christ. Interesting, but too thin.
2) Wright is not clear concerning the Pauline authorship of the Pastoral letters. He spends several pages for Galatians and Romans, but Titus and 1-2 Timothy are briefly overviewed in 3 paragraphs, with a question mark on the chronology. Not that this position is exclusive to Wright—several Pauline scholars affirm that these letters were not penned by Paul—but he gives little clue to the questions. Maybe this is not the book for that, but a straightforward position, either pro or against Pauline authorship, could have been taken.
3) Wright does not get to more complicated issues concerning Paul in his historical context. A good example is the longe-debated affirmations of Paul about women in church. Wright explores the democratic statement of Galatians 3:28, and how this was attractive for women in the Roman World (check the chapter "The Challenge of Paul"), but how can we set passages such as 1 Corinthians 14 or 2 Timothy 2 in Paul's life and historical backdrop? Again, we're dealing with a biography, not a theological introduction to Paul, but it would be at least interesting to consider these passages as part of Paul's influence, in order to answer one of the book's big question "Why was Paul's ministry successful" in spite of such limitations to the female gender?
All in all, this is a consistent book, and some paragraphs can make you rediscover the power of Paul's legacy (See the closing of the book on pp. 430-2). Even the way Wright explores Paul's insistence on the unity of Jews and Gentiles in Romans and in the last chapter is highly elegant, way far from dead academic halls we can find elsewhere. Here's an author in love with Paul, and who might make you have a "road to Damascus experience" with the apostle's life.
A very interesting and mature work presenting the life and thought of the most important Christian thinker in ancient history: the Apostle Paul. As a result of a whole research life on the figure, Tom Wright deals with confidence and—most of the time—with clarity about Paul in his historical context. Although aware of both Jewish and Roman backgrounds, Wright emphasizes—way more, one should say—the former as the matrix through which Paul is trying to read and explain the Christian faith. The second chapter, on the significance of "zeal" for the young Saul was very helpful for me. The question of change of style in some of Paul's letters (esp. from 1 to 2 Corinthians) as a result of experiences of deep suffering in Ephesus is also quite thought-provoking.
However, I still bring some important questions concerning the whole work. The main ones are:
1) It seems like Wright speculates too much about Paul's prayer life. For instance, according to Wright, the significance of Paul's conversion on the road to Damascus is directly related to the Jewish practice of prayerful meditation in key passages, especially Ezekiel 1. Although a fascinating suggestion, it has very little biblical-historical basis. No direct scriptural echo is pointed. But for Wright, relating Ezekiel 1 to the Damascus experience explains why Paul suddenly understood why the One God Creator was present in Jesus Christ. Interesting, but too thin.
2) Wright is not clear concerning the Pauline authorship of the Pastoral letters. He spends several pages for Galatians and Romans, but Titus and 1-2 Timothy are briefly overviewed in 3 paragraphs, with a question mark on the chronology. Not that this position is exclusive to Wright—several Pauline scholars affirm that these letters were not penned by Paul—but he gives little clue to the questions. Maybe this is not the book for that, but a straightforward position, either pro or against Pauline authorship, could have been taken.
3) Wright does not get to more complicated issues concerning Paul in his historical context. A good example is the longe-debated affirmations of Paul about women in church. Wright explores the democratic statement of Galatians 3:28, and how this was attractive for women in the Roman World (check the chapter "The Challenge of Paul"), but how can we set passages such as 1 Corinthians 14 or 2 Timothy 2 in Paul's life and historical backdrop? Again, we're dealing with a biography, not a theological introduction to Paul, but it would be at least interesting to consider these passages as part of Paul's influence, in order to answer one of the book's big question "Why was Paul's ministry successful" in spite of such limitations to the female gender?
All in all, this is a consistent book, and some paragraphs can make you rediscover the power of Paul's legacy (See the closing of the book on pp. 430-2). Even the way Wright explores Paul's insistence on the unity of Jews and Gentiles in Romans and in the last chapter is highly elegant, way far from dead academic halls we can find elsewhere. Here's an author in love with Paul, and who might make you have a "road to Damascus experience" with the apostle's life.
December 26, 2023
Fantastic.
dnf
April 26, 2024Jenny's complaint about this one was that she wasn't sure of the target audience. Readers already familiar with Paul will already know a lot of it. I agree. Wright spends a lot of time outlining and quoting from each of Paul's letters to the point that I keep finding myself wondering why I'm reading this instead of just reading Paul's letters themselves. But I try to read the Bible daily already, so. This might be a better read for someone less familiar with the Bible. There was great moments and quotes throughout, but a lot of it is not new info for me. DNF.
Read for #welovejenny
I also talk about books on my YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@ChristyLuisD...
Read for #welovejenny
I also talk about books on my YouTube channel https://www.youtube.com/@ChristyLuisD...
February 2, 2021
It's a book that doesn't know what it wants to be: history, biography, or philosophy text? Sometimes it tries to be all three simultaneously...resulting in a great deal of rambling, little structure, and a reader who wants to tear out his hair. However, when it does manage to focus, it's easy to read, informative, even a little witty. It's less than the sum of its parts, but all those parts on their own are worth the frustration.
February 24, 2020
One of my favorite persons is a protestant chaplain at Loyola University Chicago. Raised in a conservative Christian milieu in the South, he has become socially quite liberal since moving to Chicago and serving a diverse community. He remains, however, a traditional Christian in that he claims to believe in the soteriological efficacy of the crucifixion and the eventual reconstitution of the dead. I, of course, find such beliefs, especially the latter, to be crazy. And so we argue, genially.
Biblical interpretation is a bit like a trial. On the defense you find those tending toward literalism, attempting to reconcile contradictory stories into some coherent and attractive whole. On the prosecution you stick to the facts and only the facts, pointing to gaps, contradictions, inconsistencies and ambiguities. My sense of academic biblical scholarship was shaped, with only a few exceptions, from the perspective of the prosecution. Here, if one liked, narratives could be constructed, but only very, very tentatively, and usually beside hosts of counter- or alternative narratives. This was, to my mind, real biblical criticism.
My friend, however, suggested that I ought try N.T. Wright, a Christian scholar he thought I'd appreciate for his knowlege and critical acumen, particularly as represented by the second volume of his book on Jesus. Well, that book, a big one, sat on the shelf for months, alongside a less scholarly and substantially shorter one by the same author, his 'Paul: A Biography'. I decided to appease my pal by reading it, giving the tome on Jesus to Heirloom Books.
Bad choice! Wright's biography of Paul is apparently the quintessence of decades of study, Wright's personal, positive appropriation of the self-appointed apostle. As a witness for the defense, if not lead counsel, Wright takes the scriptural text on face value, accepting that Luke was the physician friend of Paul and the author of the gospel lately attributed to him as well as of Acts. Then, using Acts as a basic guide, Wright ties together the letters (questioning the authorship of only a very few and entirely avoiding redaction criticism) attributed to Paul in order to construct an approbative chronicle of the man's personal and intellectual life. It reads like a boringly repetitive novel and probably would have worked better as such.
As regards the matter of constructing plausible narratives, Wright emphasizes Paul's orthodox Judaism on the one hand and his outreach to the gentiles on the other, seeing the essence of his message as being the recognition of scriptural prophesies as entailing the opening of the saving faith to all nations as revealed in the person of Christ crucified and resurrected. The disputes with the conservative Jewish Christians embodied by Jesus' brother, James, and by Peter and John are absolutely minimized, Paul coming out as the winner of the dispute despite the evidence of the Clementines and the Patristics for the perdurance of an Ebionite opposition in Palestine. So, too, the connections of Paul's thought to what moderns call 'gnosticism' (mentioned only once in the text) and what might be regarded as a kind of syncretic mysticism are disregarded. While Wright helpfully (in the sense of making sense of his thought) recognizes the metaphorical uses of the concepts of heaven and hell, seeing them as akin to states of mind or of social order (the 'kingdom' arising among us), he appears to stick literally to the incredible notions of a real, bodily resurrection of the deceased Jesus as a token of the universal resurrection to come while a more hermeneutically constructive interpretation might be obtainable by deeper consideration of the mystical body of Christ as being the salvific center of the Christian's being.
As it is, Wright's book is a tendentious, believer's take on Paul which has very little to say to non-Christians.
Biblical interpretation is a bit like a trial. On the defense you find those tending toward literalism, attempting to reconcile contradictory stories into some coherent and attractive whole. On the prosecution you stick to the facts and only the facts, pointing to gaps, contradictions, inconsistencies and ambiguities. My sense of academic biblical scholarship was shaped, with only a few exceptions, from the perspective of the prosecution. Here, if one liked, narratives could be constructed, but only very, very tentatively, and usually beside hosts of counter- or alternative narratives. This was, to my mind, real biblical criticism.
My friend, however, suggested that I ought try N.T. Wright, a Christian scholar he thought I'd appreciate for his knowlege and critical acumen, particularly as represented by the second volume of his book on Jesus. Well, that book, a big one, sat on the shelf for months, alongside a less scholarly and substantially shorter one by the same author, his 'Paul: A Biography'. I decided to appease my pal by reading it, giving the tome on Jesus to Heirloom Books.
Bad choice! Wright's biography of Paul is apparently the quintessence of decades of study, Wright's personal, positive appropriation of the self-appointed apostle. As a witness for the defense, if not lead counsel, Wright takes the scriptural text on face value, accepting that Luke was the physician friend of Paul and the author of the gospel lately attributed to him as well as of Acts. Then, using Acts as a basic guide, Wright ties together the letters (questioning the authorship of only a very few and entirely avoiding redaction criticism) attributed to Paul in order to construct an approbative chronicle of the man's personal and intellectual life. It reads like a boringly repetitive novel and probably would have worked better as such.
As regards the matter of constructing plausible narratives, Wright emphasizes Paul's orthodox Judaism on the one hand and his outreach to the gentiles on the other, seeing the essence of his message as being the recognition of scriptural prophesies as entailing the opening of the saving faith to all nations as revealed in the person of Christ crucified and resurrected. The disputes with the conservative Jewish Christians embodied by Jesus' brother, James, and by Peter and John are absolutely minimized, Paul coming out as the winner of the dispute despite the evidence of the Clementines and the Patristics for the perdurance of an Ebionite opposition in Palestine. So, too, the connections of Paul's thought to what moderns call 'gnosticism' (mentioned only once in the text) and what might be regarded as a kind of syncretic mysticism are disregarded. While Wright helpfully (in the sense of making sense of his thought) recognizes the metaphorical uses of the concepts of heaven and hell, seeing them as akin to states of mind or of social order (the 'kingdom' arising among us), he appears to stick literally to the incredible notions of a real, bodily resurrection of the deceased Jesus as a token of the universal resurrection to come while a more hermeneutically constructive interpretation might be obtainable by deeper consideration of the mystical body of Christ as being the salvific center of the Christian's being.
As it is, Wright's book is a tendentious, believer's take on Paul which has very little to say to non-Christians.
March 11, 2019
This is really very good. Wright gives great insight into the life and thinking of Paul. He persuasively shows that Paul did not “invent a new religion” as some critics claim, but instead preached a “radical messianic eschatology:” that Jesus is the “ultimate fulfillment of Israel’s hope—Messiah and resurrection,” and through the forgiveness of sins he brings salvation to both Jews and gentiles.
“If we come with the question, “How do we get to heaven,” or, in Martin Luther’s terms, “How can I find a gracious God?” and if we try to squeeze an answer to those questions out of what Paul says about justification, we will probably find one. It may not be totally misleading. But we will miss what Paul’s “justification” is really all about. It isn’t about a moralistic framework in which the only question that matters is whether we humans have behaved ourselves and so amassed a store of merit (“righteousness“) and, if not, where we can find such a store, amassed by someone else on our behalf. It is about the vocational framework in which humans are called to reflect God’s image in the world and about the rescue operation whereby God has, through Jesus, set humans free to do exactly that.”
I’ve read enough NTW that the so-called “New Perspective” on Paul is familiar enough to me, but I don’t think I’ve completely internalized it, as distinguished from the traditional reformed view. I think what I need to do is read this book again, but more slowly, along with NTW’s translation of Paul’s letters.
Here’s a couple of good reviews:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
“If we come with the question, “How do we get to heaven,” or, in Martin Luther’s terms, “How can I find a gracious God?” and if we try to squeeze an answer to those questions out of what Paul says about justification, we will probably find one. It may not be totally misleading. But we will miss what Paul’s “justification” is really all about. It isn’t about a moralistic framework in which the only question that matters is whether we humans have behaved ourselves and so amassed a store of merit (“righteousness“) and, if not, where we can find such a store, amassed by someone else on our behalf. It is about the vocational framework in which humans are called to reflect God’s image in the world and about the rescue operation whereby God has, through Jesus, set humans free to do exactly that.”
I’ve read enough NTW that the so-called “New Perspective” on Paul is familiar enough to me, but I don’t think I’ve completely internalized it, as distinguished from the traditional reformed view. I think what I need to do is read this book again, but more slowly, along with NTW’s translation of Paul’s letters.
Here’s a couple of good reviews:
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
https://www.goodreads.com/review/show...
May 5, 2024
This biography helped me become more aware of the details of Paul's life. Having read it I now feel like I know and understand Paul much better than I ever did before.
Using clues from Paul's letters and the record Luke kept in the book of Acts, combined with a historian's knowledge of the time and places Paul lived and traveled in, the author put together a picture of the Apostle that gives me a greater appreciation of who he was.
I enjoyed reading about Paul's travels and activities more than the sections of the book devoted to a summation of the letters Paul wrote, but it was all important and had to be included to give a complete story of Paul, his viewpoints, his work and philosophy.
In the end there's no new information on the outcome of Paul's life after he reached Rome, but we know that's not necessary because Paul's life is eternal; it never ends, not really. He worked for Jesus and when we get to heaven he will be one of the Apostles we may get to meet.
I loved the last chapter which wasn't just a summary of Paul's life; it focused more on the outcome of Paul's work and how his life changed the world in the centuries ahead.
The writing is scholarly yet readable with very few words I had to look up. Thirty pages/day was possible but ten pages/day was comfortable.
My opinion is that this is definitely a book worth reading. It wasn't the easiest reading experience but it helped me develop a hunger for more information about early Christian history.
Using clues from Paul's letters and the record Luke kept in the book of Acts, combined with a historian's knowledge of the time and places Paul lived and traveled in, the author put together a picture of the Apostle that gives me a greater appreciation of who he was.
I enjoyed reading about Paul's travels and activities more than the sections of the book devoted to a summation of the letters Paul wrote, but it was all important and had to be included to give a complete story of Paul, his viewpoints, his work and philosophy.
In the end there's no new information on the outcome of Paul's life after he reached Rome, but we know that's not necessary because Paul's life is eternal; it never ends, not really. He worked for Jesus and when we get to heaven he will be one of the Apostles we may get to meet.
I loved the last chapter which wasn't just a summary of Paul's life; it focused more on the outcome of Paul's work and how his life changed the world in the centuries ahead.
The writing is scholarly yet readable with very few words I had to look up. Thirty pages/day was possible but ten pages/day was comfortable.
My opinion is that this is definitely a book worth reading. It wasn't the easiest reading experience but it helped me develop a hunger for more information about early Christian history.
July 29, 2023
Good book, but I struggled to get through it. I have read a decent amount(?) of Christian books and nonfiction books and this felt pretty long and dry.
I really appreciated learning about the cultural and historical context of the Roman world in the early ADs. This gives a ton of context and depth to the New Testament letters and Acts. I also feel a new appreciation for the focus of Paul’s message being on unification of Jew and Gentile in receiving Jesus as the promised Messiah. Before reading this book, I would have said “Paul agrees with that”. But after reading this book, I would argue with Wright that the unification of believers in Jesus’s family is central.
One thing that made this book tough at times to read was the amount of conjecture about what was going on in Paul’s life and the church during this time. I caught myself thinking, “Maybe they thought that? But maybe not?” Sometimes, it was hard for me to separate fact from speculation. That might have contributed to my overall lack of engagement.
I really appreciated learning about the cultural and historical context of the Roman world in the early ADs. This gives a ton of context and depth to the New Testament letters and Acts. I also feel a new appreciation for the focus of Paul’s message being on unification of Jew and Gentile in receiving Jesus as the promised Messiah. Before reading this book, I would have said “Paul agrees with that”. But after reading this book, I would argue with Wright that the unification of believers in Jesus’s family is central.
One thing that made this book tough at times to read was the amount of conjecture about what was going on in Paul’s life and the church during this time. I caught myself thinking, “Maybe they thought that? But maybe not?” Sometimes, it was hard for me to separate fact from speculation. That might have contributed to my overall lack of engagement.
April 12, 2025
This was a very impressive summary of Paul’s life. Very thorough. I was amazed by Wright’s ability to say so much about Paul given the somewhat limited knowledge we have of him yet also his humility and honesty to acknowledge the aspects of his life that are mostly conjecture. We know a lot, but we also don’t know a lot!
Wright spent more time going in to the content of the actual letters than I was expecting. I enjoyed especially when he talked about Paul’s upbringing, motivations, travels, etc, but Wright did also do an excellent job of connecting all that background knowledge to his letters.
This certainly brought a lot of color to Paul’s letters and inspired me to read them all in a new light. I enjoyed reading this while my church has been walking slowly through Colossians. It really is amazing how the early church started. Praise be to God that it is still alive and well!
4 stars just because I feel like it was wordy at times. He seemed to beat the same dead horses over and over and it got a little old, if I’m honest.
Wright spent more time going in to the content of the actual letters than I was expecting. I enjoyed especially when he talked about Paul’s upbringing, motivations, travels, etc, but Wright did also do an excellent job of connecting all that background knowledge to his letters.
This certainly brought a lot of color to Paul’s letters and inspired me to read them all in a new light. I enjoyed reading this while my church has been walking slowly through Colossians. It really is amazing how the early church started. Praise be to God that it is still alive and well!
4 stars just because I feel like it was wordy at times. He seemed to beat the same dead horses over and over and it got a little old, if I’m honest.
August 14, 2021
This is a wonderful book. It has taken me a good while to read, and having finished I feel it would be good to go back and start again from the beginning. Like lots of Christians I have little knowledge of the life of Paul, beyond the fact that he was a Jew, that he persecuted the first Christians, that he had a dramatic conversion, and that he then became the greatest missionary of the ancient world. I am aware that many non believers in our day hate him because of ideas about him which are plain wrong. It is so popular to take extracts of his writings and then judge him on the basis of modern social ideas. This book sets the life and thinking of Paul firmly in the place and time that he lived, which shows him to be the extraordinary man that he was. It shows why Paul’s surviving writings are so foundational to the Christian movement to this day. It depicts a man who is surely one of the most extraordinary that has ever lived.
One reason I loved it is that I realized that Paul was a man who like me had never met Jesus in the flesh, and yet who encountered Jesus in an extraordinary and supernatural way, and whose life was transformed by that meeting, setting him on a completely different path through life. Though there are few other similarities between me and Paul, I found this one fact quite encouraging. It made me feel that somehow Paul and I belong to the same band of brothers (and sisters) who despite all the setbacks of life, are convinced by and committed to Jesus. For us this changes everything.
One reason I loved it is that I realized that Paul was a man who like me had never met Jesus in the flesh, and yet who encountered Jesus in an extraordinary and supernatural way, and whose life was transformed by that meeting, setting him on a completely different path through life. Though there are few other similarities between me and Paul, I found this one fact quite encouraging. It made me feel that somehow Paul and I belong to the same band of brothers (and sisters) who despite all the setbacks of life, are convinced by and committed to Jesus. For us this changes everything.
October 13, 2018
A really fun (and at times very imaginative) read about Paul’s life. I realize this was written for a popular level audience, but I really do wish Wright cited references to his claims (especially since he has many fascinating insights). Interviews here: http://paulcastpod.libsyn.com/nt-wrig... https://omny.fm/shows/the-eric-metaxa... http://ntwrightpage.com/2018/03/11/th.... Some commendations (with much to appreciate) and critiques (with cautions) here: Andrew Wilson: https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/re... David E. Briones: https://tabletalkmagazine.com/posts/2... Ben Witherington (Part 1): http://www.patheos.com/blogs/bibleand..., (Part 2): http://www.patheos.com/blogs/bibleand..., and (Part 3): http://www.patheos.com/blogs/bibleand... Wyatt Graham: http://wyattgraham.com/review-of-paul... Susan Grove Eastman: https://www.christiancentury.org/revi....
Read
July 15, 2024Hefty read but woahhhhh. I mean genuinely probably the best contextualizing theology book I’ve ever read. The grand picture and character he paints of Paul is truly insane, and Wrights level of knowledge in the field trickles over into every little interaction Paul has that he’s able to recontextualize and add so much flavor based on his knowledge of Judaic, Greek, and Roman norms
I mean it literally feels like I know Paul now which I know is insane but it made me understand his missionary journeys, what he actually did on them, what the communities looked like, and what the letters were practically sent for. There’s so much info and data to process it’s hard to even condense my appreciation of it
I think the best and most significant reason that this book succeeds so strongly for me is because he tells it all like a story. I’ve read countless biographies and assorted books that dump info but lack any sort of connective thread or mnemonic device to aid in retention. The human brain learns best in stories and that’s exactly what NT does. He tells a beautiful story with rich context and flavor in a way that few can and so by the end you don’t feel like you’ve just learned about Paul but instead been on that journey with him
Fantastic read. Highly recommend to anyone even vaguely interested in Christianity
I mean it literally feels like I know Paul now which I know is insane but it made me understand his missionary journeys, what he actually did on them, what the communities looked like, and what the letters were practically sent for. There’s so much info and data to process it’s hard to even condense my appreciation of it
I think the best and most significant reason that this book succeeds so strongly for me is because he tells it all like a story. I’ve read countless biographies and assorted books that dump info but lack any sort of connective thread or mnemonic device to aid in retention. The human brain learns best in stories and that’s exactly what NT does. He tells a beautiful story with rich context and flavor in a way that few can and so by the end you don’t feel like you’ve just learned about Paul but instead been on that journey with him
Fantastic read. Highly recommend to anyone even vaguely interested in Christianity
April 2, 2023
A fitting and clarifying companion for my New Testament Theology class, begun and finished - rather unintentionally, at first - alongside our study of the Pauline epistles and a few long-awaited moments of labored understanding in learning Greek. Wright gives a historian’s portrait of Paul that is very similar to that wrought by Walter Wangerin in his pseudo-fictional account — Paul is a man forthright and tireless, blunt and vulnerable, brilliant and adaptable, and driven by zealous love of Jesus and by Jesus’ zealous love for him.
Moreover, Wright helpfully guides the the needle threading Acts and the Epistles into a cohesive and chronological whole while providing the necessary nuances and circumstances that shaped the writing and emphases of each letter. This is a good place to go if one wants an intro into “New Perspective” Pauline thought (though I am still having a difficult time distinguishing where the points of *actual* contention with the “old” perspective are, when it is properly understood and taught without listing towards certain extremes of emphasis) without getting too far into the academic theological weeds.
Moreover, Wright helpfully guides the the needle threading Acts and the Epistles into a cohesive and chronological whole while providing the necessary nuances and circumstances that shaped the writing and emphases of each letter. This is a good place to go if one wants an intro into “New Perspective” Pauline thought (though I am still having a difficult time distinguishing where the points of *actual* contention with the “old” perspective are, when it is properly understood and taught without listing towards certain extremes of emphasis) without getting too far into the academic theological weeds.
Read
October 18, 2018I feel I needed to know and understand more about two crucial major religious figures who effected a major transformation in religion, St Paul and Luther , and I saw this book as a chance to have an introduction to Paul. It was readable and quite interesting in parts. There was an excellent warning at the outset about projecting modern interpretations onto past times, but I sensed that there were times when the author did not really heed his own warning. I think that is always going to be so difficult. I was also quite taken by a different understanding of heaven, which made a lot more sense than the one I grew up with. It was well written, but sadly I wanted less life and story and more ideas and discussion and the way they fitted into the world at that time. Yeah I know, what should I have expected from a biography? I think the real problem was not the book but the fact I chose that as the first venture into a world I knew so little about. For this reason, I will refrain from lowering its excellent ratings.
January 7, 2026
An excellent read. At times, it reminds me of a biography in the style of Ron Chernow. Wright goes to great lengths to tie together all we know of Paul from contemporary texts and the cultural, religious, and political contexts Paul worked in, while also avoiding some of the speculation that's often popular, and efforts to reconsider Paul first through medieval or contemporary understanding
June 3, 2024
I really liked the approach this author took and it helped me see Paul's humanity better. I appreciated how he filled in a lot of background and cultural practices that I didn't know about. At times this book got very academic for me and a few times I would have liked for him to dive deeper into some things. Overall a very insightful read, one I could easily reread.
September 22, 2024
This incredible book is dense, intellectual, and challenging. My husband and I read and discussed it together. It took months.
Time spent on this book is so worth it! It has transformed the way I read and understand the books of Paul.
The author is amazing and hasn’t failed to stun me so far.
Time spent on this book is so worth it! It has transformed the way I read and understand the books of Paul.
The author is amazing and hasn’t failed to stun me so far.
May 1, 2018
A refreshing stream in contrast to the stagnant pool of typical evangelical readings of Paul.
April 20, 2024
I’m so glad I read this. I’ve always felt intrigued yet intimidated by Paul. This book seeks to explore what “makes Paul tick” and it fostered admiration for him in me. I appreciate all of the research that went into this book and its way of organizing scripture into a chronological biography of Paul.
“People may sometimes have wished he would not give them quite so much of himself- life would not have been dull when he was around, but it would not have been particularly relaxing either- but they would have acknowledged that when they were with him, they saw truth more clearly because they saw it in his face and felt the love of God more warmly because they knew it was what drove him on.”
“People may sometimes have wished he would not give them quite so much of himself- life would not have been dull when he was around, but it would not have been particularly relaxing either- but they would have acknowledged that when they were with him, they saw truth more clearly because they saw it in his face and felt the love of God more warmly because they knew it was what drove him on.”
Displaying 1 - 30 of 932 reviews