Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Forbidden Knowledge: Medicine, Science, and Censorship in Early Modern Italy

Rate this book
An exploration of the censorship of medical books from their proliferation in print through the prohibitions placed on them during the Counter-Reformation.

Forbidden Knowledge explores the censorship of medical books from their proliferation in print through the prohibitions placed on them during the Counter-Reformation. How and why did books banned in Italy in the sixteenth century end up back on library shelves in the seventeenth? Historian Hannah Marcus uncovers how early modern physicians evaluated the utility of banned books and facilitated their continued circulation in conversation with Catholic authorities.
 
Through extensive archival research, Marcus highlights how talk of scientific utility, once thought to have begun during the Scientific Revolution, in fact, began earlier, emerging from ecclesiastical censorship and the desire to continue to use banned medical books. What’s more, this censorship in medicine, which preceded the Copernican debate in astronomy by sixty years, has had a lasting impact on how we talk about new and controversial developments in scientific knowledge. Beautiful illustrations accompany this masterful, timely book about the interplay between efforts at intellectual control and the utility of knowledge.

360 pages, Hardcover

Published September 25, 2020

67 people want to read

About the author

Hannah Marcus

6 books1 follower

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
5 (50%)
4 stars
5 (50%)
3 stars
0 (0%)
2 stars
0 (0%)
1 star
0 (0%)
Displaying 1 of 1 review
Profile Image for Cana McGhee.
220 reviews7 followers
November 22, 2021
short-ish book that provides a hefty intro to censorship politics at the intersection of medicine and catholicism. argues for censorship as (counter)productive of new kinds of readers, physicians, and discourses of utility/usefulness, opposed to just something constitutive of erasures.
Displaying 1 of 1 review

Can't find what you're looking for?

Get help and learn more about the design.