For every privileged guy in the world, there live thousands of talented other in wretchedness. I know people who never get opportunity to compete in this world despite having merits. So when someone shouts about meritocracy, I smile silently and leave the place. Reading about them make me realise my privileged existence in the world and make me grounded. At least I had the opportunity to study with poor kids and know about poverty. But look at today’s children, I would compare them to Siddartha of Kapilavastu. They get private education mostly with kids of similar class. Pampered heavily by parents, always getting the things they want. Simply they do not know about the otherness of the Society. Worst still, some of them carry negative attitude towards poor folks. They are perplexed when confronted with real problems. These kids are the future citizenry.
When the highly learned and erudite central minister opines that more people should get out of agriculture, and somebody else advised to adopt to Israeli methods for agriculture, I do not blame them - they are convent educated kids just like our kids today. And when these people are in-charge for managing the affairs of the So-categorised “Others” and assume patronising attitude the matters turn worse for them. One more thing, As like our kids, they also do not like to be criticised. That’s why when farmers protest half naked in Delhi, it becomes entertainment for them ( Please do not assume I am against one particular party - I would prove every single party would do the same thing when in power - the problem is systemic). If a guy migrates to city, that the end. For his offsprings, Village is a casual entertainment. And one more thing, Life in Village / secondary towns are not as romantic in reality as in Bharathiraja films.
In this situation, books like ‘Nine rupees an hour’ assume significance. These kind of books offer a peephole view of the real village and its problems.
First, the style of writing - I really liked it. First there are few life sketches of a Village folks covering their trials and tribulations along with slivers of happiness and then an interview with the subject matter expert. The trouble with non-fiction reading is that the subject becomes statistics and many-a-times, you really do not think the subject as a flesh and blood human as you. This book’s approach avoids it totally and clearly conveys the issue. I have observed this approach in ‘Everybody loves a good drought’ by P. Sainath ( I am yet to finish the book, now I will restart).
Second, the contents- I would say a good mix of contents that provides the cross section of Village society - we get a glimpse of agriculture, indigenous bull breeds, Palm climbing & Sickle making constitutes Part 1. The interviews included in this section are of Ayyakkannu, Prof. S. Janakiraman (MIDS), D. Thomas Franco Rajendra Dev( AIBOC former general secretary) & P. Sainath. I consider this part to be the best in the book.
Second part deals with occupations that requires artistic skills - A dancer with folk and Bharatanatyam skills ( I didn’t know about the lad till I read this book), Kanchipuram Silk weaving designer, Nagaswaram Maker, Veena Maker, Pathamadai Mat maker,Koothu artist & Poikkaal kuthirai Artist. All of them have won awards and accolades. The interviews included in this section are of Writer Bama, Justice Prabha Sridevan & T M Krishna. The point that came up again and again was about the casteism / classicism of Bharatanatyam. I beg to differ on that count as I have observed classical music scene in the western world and would be able to draw some parallels ( a subject in itself, which required separate writing). Barring that point, I do not have much discomfort in this section.
The book rightly points to us that hard core agriculture is just a part of agrarian economy but the whole agrarian ecosystem depends on agriculture. Further this book also highlights how ill-informed we are about the real troubles of people. Many a times, government interventions (should I say misadventures) complicate the scene. One of the interviewee clearly pointed out that ‘It is indeed farmers who subsidised government and not vice versa’. I completely get it. The book also highlights unrecognised role the women in agrarian economy - I have seen it in person. The records never mention them.
Invariably, everyone wants their wards not to enter their profession - not enough money, not enough comfort and most importantly, no brides for them. Why? We are hypocrites. We simply do not value the contribution of the so called ‘Others’ to the society. Writer Bama in her interview candidly summarises
“It is about respecting another human being. If I respect a person, everything about them will seem beautiful. If I think they are lesser beings, then whatever they do will appear mediocre. We don’t value what they do because we don’t recognise them as equal human beings. The same is true for gender. A woman is objectified and only seen as someone who gives pleasure and comfort. If they were treated as equals, with dignity, rights and freedom, there won’t be any violence. This is what we are sorely lack in this country: seeing people as fellow humans.”
The book doesn’t offer solutions. Of course, It is not the purpose of the book. But it makes you think. India’s problems are very different from the problems of say Europe / Americas. But our political system adopts the solution meant for the Europeans / Americans without even considering Europe exported lot of people to Colonies and western world lost quite a bit of their working force to bloody wars. We often spend considerable energy and time in focussing on non-issues. One of the interview clearly identifies the problem -
“National dailies publishing from Delhi devote, on average, 0.67 per cent of their front page to rural India, where 69 per cent of the population lives. Why do they do this? Because corporations have reduced journalism to a revenue stream in the last thirty years. For me, paid news, fake stuff, is not an aberration. It’s entirely true to the characteristic and logic of profit-seeking corporate media. ‘I will do what makes money for me; I will cover you if that makes money for me.’ So people don’t cover you if you don’t add to their revenue.”
And finally one more quote to ponder from the book - “So, we have systematically destroyed existing occupations and livelihoods without creating any alternatives. This has happened to farmers, weavers, to the agrarian society at large, in some stupid illusion that industry will absorb them. No such industry exists. What manufacturing jobs have you created in the last twenty-five years of the neoliberal economic policies ruling this country? The one sector that you’ve created jobs in was the IT sector. And in 2017, the top seven IT firms, which had a pre-tax profit of 23,000 crore, laid off 56,000 workers in the mid-senior level. Many of them might have been earning 1.5 to 2 lakh each. Then the firms would take in fresh graduates at 20,000 or 30,000 monthly and render unemployed those who faithfully served those companies for ten–fifteen years, and who are going to be in serious trouble because every one of them will have three EMIs—for the house, car and education. How will they now pay 90,000 a month? They are finished. Second, there are going to be fewer and fewer jobs in the kind of development we have undertaken. On the one hand, a lot of jobs are automated, robotised. And on the other, Artificial Intelligence is going to wipe out, on a scale we cannot imagine today, even many middle class occupations. Not just those of workers. In banks, ATMs have replaced so many jobs. But earlier, they destroyed you in one area, because they needed you in another. Now, they’re going to have people they don’t need anywhere. Huge sections will be completely dispossessed. They’ll replace them with automation, AI and machines. You haven’t a hope in hell in addressing this question within the current policy framework. You cannot address it when you’re grooming and nurturing inequality. Inequality is the womb of violence, the cradle of fundamentalism, the playground of unelected power, and the graveyard of secularism and democracy. You’re creating such great, gigantic inequalities.”