When I first picked up this book, I thought I would mostly be reading about other people's experiences. Although I lurked on some forums back in the day, I now spend most of my internet time in group chats and on social media. Facebook and Twitter are wide open, so community moderation doesn't really affect my life, right? Once I started reading, I was surprised by how much of it resonated with me after all. I came away thinking that moderation plays a big role in how we talk to each other, including in ways that aren't so obvious.
The big thing I learned in this book is that most of the work in community moderation is invisible to those of us who aren't looking for it. Moderators don't just block content after the fact: they do something much harder, which is to build consensus around group norms, articulate them, and reinforce them over time. How this actually plays out depends on a lot of factors, including the prevailing culture (gamers have different expectations than political activists) and the tools of the platform (reddit provides moderators many more tools than Facebook). Formal moderation on the platform level is also a factor, but there's a whole lot of room between what Facebook will allow to stay up and what a specific group of people considers acceptable behavior.
As noted in the introduction, these chapters are largely independent from each other, and you can skip straight to a chapter that you're especially curious about. The book isn't a comprehensive survey of everywhere we talk online, but it covers a wide variety of communities, large and small, discussing serious and lighthearted topics. One thing I found intriguing is that I had expected an online-only vs offline meetup dichotomy, but the lines are actually blurry, since NextDoor and other neighborhood listservs can bring people online who may already know each other socially, while NUMTOT members have organized meetups after having met online via common interests. The distinction between professional and volunteer is also an ambiguous one. Paid moderators are often not part of a community, so they may overlook details because they aren't tuned in to nuances. Meanwhile, volunteer moderators on subreddits and in Facebook groups can take the role very seriously, with application processes and clearly outlined expectations for how responsive they must be, sometimes significantly encroaching on their personal time.
One thing I really appreciated was how well we get to know the example moderators who were interviewed for the book. I found the dinner club chapter to be a tough read at times because I disagree with the entire premise of their mission. I don't think racial injustice comes from personal disdain; I think it comes from self-interest and power structures, and I think it's misguided to work exclusively on the former. It was depressing to read about how much work the moderators put into running that group because I personally thought that their work was futile. But that's my criticism of the subjects being profiled, not the chapter itself; what I find so powerful about this book is how it paints a picture of the regular people, often only a few of them, who are pouring their hearts into holding these communities together.
I had a lot of fun reading this book, and I think it's an informative read for those of us who just participate in or even lurk in communities. It certainly made me grateful for people who curate the spaces I enjoy on the internet.