Jump to ratings and reviews
Rate this book

Statistics: Concepts and Controversies

Rate this book
There are books on statistical theory and books on statistical methods. This is neither. It is a book on statistical ideas and statistical reasoning and on their relevance to public policy and to the human sciences from medicine to sociology. We have included many elementary graphical and numerical techniques to give flesh to the ideas and muscle to the reasoning. Students learn to think about data by working with data. We have not, however, allowed technique to dominate concepts. Our intention is to teach verbally rather than algebraically, to invite discussion and even argument rather than mere computation, though some computation remains essential. The coverage is considerably broader than one might traditionally cover in a one-term course, as the table of contents reveals. In the spirit of general education, we have preferred breadth to detail.


Despite its informal nature, SCC is a textbook. It is organized for systematic study and has abundant exercises, many of which ask students to offer a discussion or make a judgment. Even those admirable individuals who seek pleasure in uncompelled reading should look at the exercises as well as the text. Teachers should be aware that the book is more serious than its low mathematical level suggests. The emphasis on ideas and reasoning asks more of the reader than many recipe-laden methods texts.


For the first time, SCC will publish with SaplingPlus as it's full course digital solution. We'll have a well developed library of both error specific feedback and generic feedback tutorial assessment, aligned to the main learning goals of the chapter and largely taken directly from the end-of-chapter exercises in the book. SaplingPlus will also host our robust suite of teaching and learning resources: Concept and Controversy videos, statistical applets, Learning Curve, data sets, and many more teaching and learning focused tools.

672 pages, Paperback

First published January 1, 1996

Loading...
Loading...

About the author

David S. Moore

387 books5 followers
Librarian Note: There is more than one author by this name in the Goodreads database.

David S. Moore is (retired) Shanti S. Gupta Distinguished Emeritus Professor of statistics at Purdue University (Lafayette, IN).

Ratings & Reviews

What do you think?
Rate this book

Friends & Following

Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!

Community Reviews

5 stars
21 (25%)
4 stars
25 (30%)
3 stars
22 (26%)
2 stars
7 (8%)
1 star
7 (8%)
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
Profile Image for Jimyanni.
653 reviews23 followers
March 12, 2010
This book accomplishes what it sets out to accomplish admirably; it sets out the basic concepts of statistics with as little reliance on Math as possible, to give students who are not Math-oriented an idea of the subject.

If you are Math-oriented, and already know a bit about statistics, you will not learn much here. But that is not the fault of the book; it is not intended to teach someone with a grounding in the subject, any more than it is a flaw of an intro Biology textbook that it doesn't teach Organic Chemistry.

I have a couple of minor quibbles about this book, but they're really too minor to mention, and are certainly too minor to dock it a star for.
Profile Image for Edie Brown.
68 reviews
February 26, 2021
STAT 1350 is a college course. Now I know that I'm too old. What happened to dozens of problems to work? At least my kids like it.
Profile Image for Nick.
78 reviews10 followers
July 24, 2011
What can you say about this "book". It leads to a website a student has access to for one semester. You learn about Stats. It does a good job of explaining concepts. You take deep breaths for patience, look away from the sunny afternoon outside, and step through the concepts. And then you get an 'A' in the class.
Profile Image for Samantha.
21 reviews2 followers
Read
May 18, 2017
Great intro to statistics for everyday purposes such as understanding health research or evaluating whether they're being used well in the news.
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews