This might be the only fiction book about the principle of seriality that you find. I had never heard of this or the man who espoused it, Paull Kammerer. His studies led him to believe that seriality exists and is similar to light waves, with similar wave properties - peaks and valleys. Certain manifestations of probability/coincidence are the peaks of seriality, but the waves are always there. Our narrator, Wilhelm Bolt, has read Kammerer and is a believer as well. He latched on to this principle in his quest for a scientific explanation of why things happen – especially bad things. Specifically – why did he lose his wife and young child?
This book is about Bolt’s life and two past “connections” that he shares. Bolt begins this book lying in his coffin, dead, but very much aware of things going on around him, and narrating our story. In death, he now has memories beyond his own life. He will later explain “my recollections are not conventional memories, “ and refer to his as an “expanded concept of memory.”
When Bolt’s grandniece Lea plays the cello by his coffin, Bolt thinks “Many, many things have happened through the generations in order that the two of us should meet. Many things have happened so that we should lose each other. There’s a connection; it’s well hidden, but it’s there; it can be searched out by one who no longer has limbs or loins to drag around.” This connection is Bolt’s understanding of seriality.
We will learn that Bolt has written a manuscript of his own on seriality, which Lea finds after he has died. He writes “I have no conclusions to draw at the moment, other than that the material suggests there is, in addition to causality, an a-causal principle at work in the universe which strives toward unity, edification. My observations of Nature suggest this too.” This revealed to readers that Bolt’s interest in beekeeping was because of his interest in seriality.
Bolt spent much of his adult life a reclusive, angry man. He is happier lying in his coffin, because he believes his theories regarding seriality have been confirmed. He says that just by showing up at his mansion, Lea confirmed this. But then she does much more. Bolt’s death triggers Lea to eventually reach the same conclusion he had, and she repeats his same lines: “She can remember everything, even that which lies beyond her own experience. Everything that has happened, Thomas. We met each other and lost each other. Many things happened, over long periods of time, in order that the two of us should lose each other.” The loss of Thomas sent her life spiraling. A spiraling that led her to come to live with Bolt. A connection that supports Bolt’s a-causal principle at work in the universe.
With no body to hinder him, Bolt lets readers know he is now able to finally trace the hidden “connections” to his life. He will share four very detailed stories. The first and last stories are about his life. The first is his story with Lea. The final one is his history, we learn why he became an angry man. The second and third tales are ‘connections” in his history. He appears briefly in the second tale - the story of Josepha, a lighthouse keeper’s daughter. Josefa sees Bolt wandering along the beach – even though they live in different time periods. Bolt was born in 1912. Josepha was 14 in 1898. Yet, already in 1898 Bolt was an old man when he appears. Josepha realizes while looking at him, that he doesn’t belong here. She thinks he might be a ghost, as ghosts are frequently seen on the island. The author gives readers a “hint” about this encounter – having Bolt himself address the confusion of him appearing in this story “Don’t you understand? This is simply one of my memories. Simply a journey. I have to follow my tracks. My very specific tracks. You could say that remembering is my assignment.”
Bolt does not appear in the third story, which is set in Renaissance Rome, and the author does not reveal Bolt’s connection to these characters. Perhaps his connection is to the pivotal Madonna with Orange painting that is central to this story. Is there a connection to a similar Madonna with Orange painting in the Lighthouse island chapel of book 2, or is that just a coincidence? One character claims to be miraculously cured by the Italian painting, and Josepha claims that miracles occur when she sings in the chapel by the painting. Another coincidence?
The author chooses to leave much to the reader to figure out. For instance, some questions about Aid: characters allude that Aid has a drinking problem, but does he? When he was suffering from despair and contemplating suicide, the one thing that keeps him going is knowing that a great singing voice like the one he has lost could be inherited by his offspring. But he doesn’t have any children, does he? Hansen chooses not to divulge the secret Aid finally shares with Josepha. Is that secret why Aid chose to stay on the island all those years? Is Josepha the offspring that inherited his voice? If yes, it changes the whole meaning of this story. We are led to believe in this “tale of protection” that it was Kalle protecting Aid by not accusing him of negligence causing a shipwreck, but was it really Aid protecting Kalle from his secret with his wife? Bolt does answer some questions at the end the second story before moving on to the third tale. He tells readers that Aid will die within a year, and great things will happen for Josepha off the island. Bolt must know the whole story about Aid, but like the author, he chooses not to share it all.
Hansen has written a fascinating, but complex book here. He was able to weave well-researched details about bees, the Renaissance gilding process, the history of lighthouses, and the principle of seriality into his four stories about characters in different time periods and locations.