What do you think?
Rate this book


310 pages, Paperback
First published May 31, 2020


”...normal waking consciousness, rational consciousness as we call it, is but one special type of consciousness, whilst all about it, parted from it by the filmiest of screens[*], there lie potential forms of consciousness entirely different. We may go through life without suspecting their existence; but apply the requisite stimulus, and at a touch they are there in all their completeness, definite types of mentality which probably somewhere have their field of application and adaptation. No account of the universe in its totality can be final which leaves these other forms of consciousness quite disregarded. How to regard them is the question,—for they are so discontinuous with ordinary consciousness. Yet they may determine attitudes though they cannot furnish formulas, and open a region though they fail to give a map. At any rate, they forbid a premature closing of our accounts with reality.”
[*]Which of course brings to mind our late mister William H. Gass, who in “The Tunnel” refers to consciousness as ”that most fragile and translucent of screens, that most rapid and forceful of hidden rivers,[...] a floating web, really, of the most delicate connections[...]”
"[...]the subconscious is a powerful muse, an engine that works on its own and must be oiled here and there. Or maybe it’s better to describe the subconscious as a reticent creature that must be coaxed out of the darkness. Sometimes it wants to grovel in the black mud and not come out, other times it wants to fan out its feathers and reveal nearly the entirety of its glory. I’ve learned to put my trust in this creature, to put up with it, to take care of it. It seems to be nurtured by a capricious diet of every little thing and no thing at all. And thus, inspiration can come from a poem, a chance phrase in an eavesdropped conversation, misheard or otherwise, the itch on my left buttock once satiated by my fingernails. It is unpredictable, so one learns simply to be aware of everything and when those stars align it can be something that I’m hesitant to call ‘spiritual.’ "
(full interview: https://thecollidescope.com/2019/07/0...)
G.S.:
Thank you for a great question, Kristian. I don't think mimicry is required for the process, but it can be a wonderful style of writing. I also don't think that there is much drinking from straws happening. More like lapping at various hadean rivers, styx, phlegethon, lethe, etc. without knowing which is which and at some point the taste can manifest as something helpful, if not epiphanic. Naturally, talking about the subconscious is often as hazy as the thing itself. But I think the role it plays in all creative endeavors is vast. It shouldn't be too surprising, though, considering we are only conscious of a small fraction of what goes on in our brains, but that is what makes it so fascinating I think. The not-knowing and then sometimes, eventually, maybe...knowing.
G.S.:[end]
I agree, Kristian. A semi-collapse of consciousness may be possible through meditation, but if you are meditating then you don't have the ability to start a novel at the same time.
Oh yes, the mimicry is not immune to that omnipresent influencer, the subconscious.
I actually just finished a wonderful story written from the point of view of a single brain cell (in Shakespeare's skull). Here is something of a relevant passage:
"I inhabit an enchanted loom where millions of flashing shuttles weave a dissolving pattern, always meant to be 'meaningful,' though not commercial, am not in trade, am not obliged to deliver the goods. So the fault, if fault there be, lies with another part of the loom--the motoric switches no doubt--as well as with mine hosts' own sloven nature."