Ranking non fiction books is always a challenge. At least for me, that haven’t read that many yet to have a lot to compare them with.
I feel we can always learn something from non fiction, which is the main goal, so it’s always rewarding. Nevertheless, I decided to go to 4 stars, instead of 5, and I will explain why.
I’ve felt the book, overall, is very well constructed. I’ve read “Invisible Women” (by Carolina Criado Pérez) and I consider it an excellent book for all of those that want to start reading more about feminism. It tackles a lot of issues, but in a less deepper approach. If you start “Why women are poorer than men and what we can do about it”, know that it is much more in depth, so it may not be ideal if you are, just now, starting on the topic. Still, I consider it a good book in the sense that it explores several problems concerning women’s finances.
The author starts by saying that she will be focusing on Europe and North America, and I highly appreciated the fact that she chose a region to focus on (she explains the reasons). The truth is, women’s reality - finance and otherwise - is highly shaped by women’s surroundings, country they are living in, etc. I feel it makes more sense to tackle issues by regions and explore the inequality that arises in result of a specific reality, rather than try a “one size fits all approach”.
Despite being focus on Europe + North America, the book is mainly focused on UK and USA realities, which is not a problem per si. However, it becomes somewhat boring for those of us living in Europe or North America but outside of UK and USA when specific politics of UK/USA are being discussed, which ended up being the reason for lowering the classification from 5 to 4 stars. Additionally, given the fact that a LOT of Europe’s countries work in euros, it felt like something was lacking when money was being discussed only in dollars and pounds. Could I looked up the conversion? Yes, yes I could. But I felt this doesn’t solve the issue for some reasons:
1. If the author (British) decided to present money only in pounds, I could understand, but since she does it in both pounds and dollars, just felt like a lack of effort to not have it in euros as well
2. This book deals with the reality when it was written. Money conversion is not always the same, it depends on money’s prize, so, if I look up the conversion 5 years from now, I won’t be getting the correct information about reality at the time. At least, we should have a table of the conversion at the time, for the countries under analysis
3. Just doesn’t make sense representing Europe’s reality regarding money but doesn’t presenting the values in Europe’s most used coin