This book has convinced me never to even dream about working at Netflix.
The work culture seems extremely toxic. Some of their mantras, like “Adequate performance gets a generous severance package” is borderline sickening, for two reasons:
1. It stokes fear, if not terror in their employees that if they are not “rock-stars” then they will lose their jobs.
2. Netflix does it primarily not to get sued. In fact, departing employees only get the severance package if they agree not to sue.
They have these other mantras, such as “The Keeper Test” which says that: “If a person on your team were to quit tomorrow, would you try to change their mind? Or would you accept their resignation, perhaps with a little relief? If the latter, you should give them a severance package now and look for a star, someone you would fight to keep.”
This is a tad ridiculous - first and foremost because my opinion about someone on a team could differ from another person’s opinion. Who is making the final call? Also, there could be a star performer who is atrocious to work with, or an adequate performer who is delightful to work with. The Netflix culture would likely encourage employees to keep the rock-star performer who is a nightmare to get along with. In that case, would I accept that decision with relief of anguish?
One could quip, "but Netflix has other mantras in place to get rid of brilliant jerks," to which I'd say, who is making the final call on who is a jerk? What if they are jerks to others but not to the boss, or vice-versa?
I’ve also worked with colleagues who did not perform amazingly the first year or so, but then truly grew into their roles, took charge and contributed significantly to the team. I suspect Netflix would let a lot of those people go too, which is a shame.
Other policies such as releasing control to employees but then exploding if they use a company card to buy food and drinks with colleagues baffles me. How can anyone feel safe in an environment like that?
Netflix also has a policy of giving each other immediate actionable feedback, whether good or bad, that is aimed to assist personal development. While the intentions here are ostensibly good, it's easy to see why people might take offense, or might use this policy too loosely criticizing and judging everything people do. Think what you may, but I am with the 18th-century French philosopher, Voltaire, on this one, when he said: "Everything you say should be true, but not everything true should be said."
As someone who has lived in 3 continents, their graphs on culture maps and what works well in one culture and not another strikes me as extraordinarily pathetic and simplistic. It sums up entire cultures in groups such as "confrontational" or "confrontation-avoidant", but this is akin to saying all Japanese eat sushi and all Italians eat pizza. It's a funny conversation to be had at the pub, but reality is more nuanced than that.
Netflix is also known for its mantra, "we're a team, not a family." I understand why they do this: you cannot fire and heartlessly get rid of family members if they don't perform. That said, I'd pick the company that treats me as family, and ironically I have a sense that if a company treats its employees like family, they will perform at a higher level.
The book is well-written, and I agree with some of the goals they strive for, such as creating a team with a high talent density, but the overarching depicted work culture seems exceedingly toxic and at times myopic. I think no amount of money would convince me that this is a healthy, positive place to work. If I ran a business, I would not implement Netflix’s “no rules rules.”