An outstanding edition of Luther's most important works beautifully translated into English and ably introduced and annotated. Tryntje Helfferich has given students, pastors, and scholars the new, standard, one-volume edition of Luther in the English language. Containing 24 different pieces (often abridged in places), Helfferich carries us through Luther's career from his 95 theses to his final, very controversial writings about Jews. The selection and notes are quite balanced; the editor clearly thinks Luther is a force to be reckoned with, but she avoids panegyric or polemic. Rather, she presents him with all his mistakes and excesses, all his powers and passions.
After reading Luther, which I haven't done in quite some time, I have to admit I'm mesmerized by him. One can only be grasped by his brazenness, his earthiness, his humor, his command of the Scriptures, his obsession with truth and authenticity. In much of this he reads as a startlingly modern writer; absent (at least in this selection) is any sense of the late-medieval decorum of the spiritual writers or of Aristotelian or Thomistic "rules" for theology and rhetoric. Luther writes with his fury and he writes to poke and prod, upset and insult. His rhetoric and his style are his own, though influenced heavily by Augustine and most especially the prophets (at their most furious). Otherwise, most of his writings are very, very different (in my opinion) from his late-medieval forebears, such as Tauler or the author of the Theologia Germanica. Luther was certainly capable of sweetness (occasionally), but his public stance or posture in his writings is not one of appreciation or contemplation, but of combat. His spirituality is a manly one, suffused with martial metaphors and battle imagery.
It is perhaps in his seriousness about the power of biblical language and his never-ending focus on our justification in Christ that his genius and enduring impact lie. To this I might add the unique focus on music in his writings and personal life; perhaps no other theologian has regarded music, including performance and composition, as seriously. And, finally, one more thing comes to mind; I don't think Luther had anything to gain by such frequent references in his writings to children, young women, and ordinary folk. Luther regarded the work of the humble, Christian washer-woman as more divine than the pope's work. This break-down between sacred/secular, clerical/lay must have been a bombshell for all Germans reading and hearing Luther in the 16th century. His insistence on the holiness of changing diapers would have been something quite new and radical. It can be argued that it still is!
As I come away from this volume, I have several questions I would have asked Dr Luther if I had been a university student boarding in his home, the former Augustinian monastery in Wittenberg:
- In the Bondage of the Will (included in this volume), how can we separate actions with divine or damnable consequences from "ordinary" or "earthly" actions, given the sacred/profane distinction doesn't carry weight any more? Do not all actions lead toward or away from God? Then how can we avoid full-on determinism, and even quite possibly the heresy of Apollinarism? What is the connection of the mind (νοῦς) to the will (θέλημα) (as in Greek the νοῦς can also mean the mind's activity, not just its passive receptivity)? Does not the terminology about "natural" versus "graced" powers lead us do a God-less place? In other words, aren't all natural powers on, closer inspection, graced ones because they are all gifts of God?
- If our faith is a gift entirely from God and not of our own doing, and, therefore, our good works do not achieve justification, then why do the New Testament writers never hesitate to talk about "rewards" for pious actions (e.g. Matt. 6:4; Rom. 2:6; 2 Cor. 5:20; Col. 3:23)? If the Bible is marked by its perspicacity, then why does the Divine Author speak so often about "reward for works" rather than "reward for faith?" Is this entirely because works are the evidence of faith, even though the emphasis in these are other verses are clearly on the work that is done, the money that is given, the human body and life that serves, etc.? How is love the fulfilling of the law (Rom. 13:10), and is this an entirely passive or an active love? If it's active, then how is it not still "law" in some sense, at least in the way defined in the Preface to the Galatians Commentary?
As I muse on these and other questions, it hits me that the New Testament emphasis is on renewal, regeneration, resurrection, transformation. The old is taken up and changed; it is not completely dissolved or nullified. The corpse is raised. The Old Adam dies but rises. The sinful mind is renewed and then transforms us (Rom. 12:2). The old wine comes into new skins. Everything is enriched and deepened and beautified. Good works apart from God do not save, but good works are never apart from God in the life of a Christian.