Ugh. An incredibly insightful, crucial book, weighed down by its lack of specific examples and its hyperfocus on what it wasn't –– The author finally got around to using workable and specific examples of Poor Queer pedagogy late in the book, after spending innumerable pages talking about the epistemological stance he was *not* taking. I want insight into what Poor Queer Studies *is,* not be re-told what I know about academia's failure to center alternative forms of knowledge-production.
This could be the foreword/introduction to a book truly digging into the meat of Poor Queer Studies. Indeed, I hope that someone writes that book soon!