After my rather bad experience with Turn Me On in the same Dare line, I decided to read another right away to hopefully replace it with a better experience. And this book did do the job.
First of all, some positives: the writing is a lot better than in the aforementioned book. It's competent, clear, it gets the story across without getting in the way or distracting me.
I liked the hero. He's charismatic and confident, but very respectful of the heroine, it's cute how he admires her. He makes sure he has her consent, no pushy behaviour as is so common in similar enemies to lovers situations where the sexual tension is strong. I appreciate that as it drives me crazy.
The heroine though, I had trouble connecting with. She was aloof and reserved, that's her personality, but I never felt like I got to see her as a person. She clearly has some degree of anxiety, and as an anxiety sufferer myself I should have been able to relate to her experiences and felt empathy for her, but somehow the book didn't manage to make me feel that. It felt very superficial and just mentioned in passing.
I don't know if it was my mood or if the pacing was a little slow or not enough happening, but I was not very engaged, it was easy to put down.
There is some rather over the top dirty talking. This is an amusing example : "“For you!” he groaned and pounded into her so fast she grew breathless. “All. For. You.”"
In general I was not really convinced by the sex scenes, somehow they didn't quite work for me. Some of them left me puzzled. The scene in the sort of sex establishment is just odd and out of the blue. I don't like that he didn't discuss it with her beforehand, he just made her go there without giving her the option to make the choice. The explanation he gave about it later made no sense to me whatsoever. Come to think of it, her meditation/masturbation session with a crystal dildo was weird too. It's not that I am narrow minded and can't accept different sexual practices. It's that there's no buildup, no introduction in the story prior to these scenes. We just get this sudden weirdness with no warning or setup, and then it's never mentioned again.
Overall this was fine, it worked, it wasn't bad, but it wasn't really good or memorable either.
A qualification for my rating : I am finding I rate many books three stars and it doesn't always mean the same thing, and I want to be able to separate them out more. Also, I realise I do rate higher often because I don't want to be mean. But really how many people see or read my reviews? I write these because it's useful to look back on for myself, otherwise I forget what I thought. So it is only useful for me if I allow myself to be honest. And yes, it will seem harsher than what many Goodreads users seem to vote. But really, I want to be following the Goodreads suggestions they give for each star. For me, 3 stars is already good, it means I liked the book! So I am going to try to utilise 2 stars more. It means something was ok, not bad or awful, just ok.