What do you think?
Rate this book
How Ike Led: The Principles Behind Eisenhower's Biggest Decisions
How Dwight D. Eisenhower led America through a transformational time--by a DC policy strategist, security expert and his granddaughter.
Few people have mad decisions as momentous as Eisenhower, nor has one person had to make such a varied range of them. From D-Day to Little Rock, from the Korean War to Cold War crises, from the Red Scare to the Missile Gap controversies, he was able to give our country eight years of peace and prosperity by relying on a core set of principles. These were informed by his heritage and upbringing, his strong character and his personal discipline, but he also avoided making himself the center of things. He tried to be the calmest in the room, not the loudest. So instead of seeking to fulfill his personal desires and political needs, he pursued a course he called the "Middle Way" that tried to make winners on both sides of a situation.
In addition, Ike maintained a big picture view on any situation; he was a strategic, not an operational leader. He also ensured that he had all the information he needed to make a decision. His talent for envisioning a whole, especially in the context of the long game, and his ability to see causes and various consequences, explains his success as Allied Commander President. Then, after making a decision, he made himself accountable for it, prizing responsibility most of all his principles.
Susan Eisenhower's 'HOW IKE LED' shows us not just what a great American did, but why - and what we can learn from him today.
Few people have mad decisions as momentous as Eisenhower, nor has one person had to make such a varied range of them. From D-Day to Little Rock, from the Korean War to Cold War crises, from the Red Scare to the Missile Gap controversies, he was able to give our country eight years of peace and prosperity by relying on a core set of principles. These were informed by his heritage and upbringing, his strong character and his personal discipline, but he also avoided making himself the center of things. He tried to be the calmest in the room, not the loudest. So instead of seeking to fulfill his personal desires and political needs, he pursued a course he called the "Middle Way" that tried to make winners on both sides of a situation.
In addition, Ike maintained a big picture view on any situation; he was a strategic, not an operational leader. He also ensured that he had all the information he needed to make a decision. His talent for envisioning a whole, especially in the context of the long game, and his ability to see causes and various consequences, explains his success as Allied Commander President. Then, after making a decision, he made himself accountable for it, prizing responsibility most of all his principles.
Susan Eisenhower's 'HOW IKE LED' shows us not just what a great American did, but why - and what we can learn from him today.
400 pages, Hardcover
First published August 11, 2020
281 people are currently reading
1309 people want to read
About the author
Susan Eisenhower
17 books18 followersSUSAN EISENHOWER, one of President Dwight D. Eisenhower's four grandchildren, is a consultant, author, and a Washington, DC-based policy strategist with many decades of work on national security issues. She lectures widely on such topics, including strategic leadership.
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 30 of 132 reviews
October 25, 2020
If I had read this book a few years ago, I would have said interesting and moved on; but, in light of the current state of the country and world, this book took on a whole new meaning. Much of what is in this book is critical to our current situation and the state of democracy in this country. Eisenhower was our last bipartisan president. Ike had no political party preference and for four years prior to his running for president both political parties attempted to get him on their ticket. When he was commander of NATO forces, he felt that democracy was in trouble in America and felt it was his duty to run for president.
The book is well written and researched. Susan Eisenhower is writing about her grandfather and the man she knew as a child. I am going to present a few points I felt were important for our current time. You will need to read the book to understand the full impact. Before deciding on which party to join, Ike interviewed both Stevenson and Robert Taft. Taft was a far-right wing politician; he believed the country should isolate itself from the world; and he favored Joe McCarthy. Ike felt Taft was accelerating the divide in the country. Ike also felt the Democrats had been in power too long. He felt isolationism was no longer possible in a nuclear world. He chose the Republican Party as he felt it was on the wrong track. He won the presidency. He selected his cabinet and staff by who was best for the job not which party they belonged too. Ike stated: the key role of the president was to unify the country. He was adamite that education was critical for a good democracy. He also pushed for civics to be taught in school. He felt everyone needs to know how government works and their obligation to it. He felt that by building a better middle class it was the best way to correct and deal with social and economic problems. He also set about rebuilding the infrastructure as it was vital for defense and commerce.
What really grabbed my attention was his view of the courts. Ike stated that it was critical for a good democracy to have it courts and judicial system non-political. He stated that it was vital for the courts to have a wide variety of viewpoints. He said the Supreme Court must represent the diverse variety of the country and come from all over the country not just one region. He also said the court much keep touch with the majority of the country. Ike stated that no extreme viewpoint should be appointed such as the far-right or far-left, racist or anti-Semitism. He said if one party or extremist viewpoint controlled the Supreme Court, democracy would lose. Both Truman and Eisenhower appointed people to the Supreme Court of opposite political parties. They chose who they thought would be best and would add a different viewpoint. (could you see that happening today) Even though Ike’s presidency was in the 1950s, what he thought about the threats to democracy is important for today. I think that everyone should read this book.
I read this as an audiobook downloaded from Audible. The book is twelve hours and forty minutes. Bernadette Dunne does a good job narrating the book.
The book is well written and researched. Susan Eisenhower is writing about her grandfather and the man she knew as a child. I am going to present a few points I felt were important for our current time. You will need to read the book to understand the full impact. Before deciding on which party to join, Ike interviewed both Stevenson and Robert Taft. Taft was a far-right wing politician; he believed the country should isolate itself from the world; and he favored Joe McCarthy. Ike felt Taft was accelerating the divide in the country. Ike also felt the Democrats had been in power too long. He felt isolationism was no longer possible in a nuclear world. He chose the Republican Party as he felt it was on the wrong track. He won the presidency. He selected his cabinet and staff by who was best for the job not which party they belonged too. Ike stated: the key role of the president was to unify the country. He was adamite that education was critical for a good democracy. He also pushed for civics to be taught in school. He felt everyone needs to know how government works and their obligation to it. He felt that by building a better middle class it was the best way to correct and deal with social and economic problems. He also set about rebuilding the infrastructure as it was vital for defense and commerce.
What really grabbed my attention was his view of the courts. Ike stated that it was critical for a good democracy to have it courts and judicial system non-political. He stated that it was vital for the courts to have a wide variety of viewpoints. He said the Supreme Court must represent the diverse variety of the country and come from all over the country not just one region. He also said the court much keep touch with the majority of the country. Ike stated that no extreme viewpoint should be appointed such as the far-right or far-left, racist or anti-Semitism. He said if one party or extremist viewpoint controlled the Supreme Court, democracy would lose. Both Truman and Eisenhower appointed people to the Supreme Court of opposite political parties. They chose who they thought would be best and would add a different viewpoint. (could you see that happening today) Even though Ike’s presidency was in the 1950s, what he thought about the threats to democracy is important for today. I think that everyone should read this book.
I read this as an audiobook downloaded from Audible. The book is twelve hours and forty minutes. Bernadette Dunne does a good job narrating the book.
July 8, 2020
First and foremost, a large thank you to NetGalley, Susan Eisenhower, St. Martin’s Press, and Thomas Dunne Books for providing me with a copy of this publication, which allows me to provide you with an unbiased review.
While I do not know a great deal about Dwight ‘Ike’ Eisenhower, I did read a thoroughly captivating biography of the man a few years ago. This book caught my eye for two distinct reasons: I am always drawn to books about political leadership, and the author is Ike’s granddaughter. I wanted to see how Susan Eisenhower would depict her grandfather as a leader and what examples she would use to exemplify this throughout his time in the limelight. Ike was a man of many principles, though he was not without his flaws. The author effectively argues that while Ike had some ‘rough times’ at West Point as a cadet, Ike was always willing and eager to see the best in people and sought to challenges textbook solutions by finding innovative ways that would be inclusive, not simply a ‘command response’. While a long-time military man, Ike respected forthrightness and those who would speak plainly to him, rather than pussyfoot around. The author offers a number of examples from his military days, including D-Day plans. This worked well into his years as president, as Ike was always open to ideas, though he could not stand empty sentiments. The author also presents Ike as blurring the line between political and apolitical, figuring that military life was devoid of partisan politics, so he did not see himself as holding a Democrat or Republican point of view. That being said, when Ike did land on one side of the political fence, he was more a centrist than a die-hard in either political spectrum. This middle of the road point of view allowed Ike to win the favour of many, as the author points out throughout, with some of his fiscal ideas, whereas the hardcore Republicans sought to bemoan his ideas as too soft. This all-encompassing point of view helped him gain the favour of others and get things done, presenting him as a president who acted as a Head of State and not simply Head of Government of of the Republicans, as many others did before him and continued thereafter. Ike was also fond of steering clear of dictating how things needed to be on an international scale when he reached the White House. As the author shows, Ike’s role in the Cold War was not to attack and demean the communist Soviets, but rather to wish the best for the people and hope that they could find a political and social system that would permit them to progress. Ike always sought freedom over oppression, but he was not one to say that he had all the answers, which is quite telling at a time when some took time from their Senate offices to vilify those who did not fall into line with the ‘American way’. This hands-off approach also helped Ike to earn much respect, rather than appear to decide what ought to be and how ‘American greatness’ was the only way to be. Ike took what he thought America needed and tried his best to bring it to pass, but was respectful in his approaches. The Civil Rights movement was but one example of where Ike felt the pressure, both in Congress and from Southern governors, but he would not back down on the idea of integration. Through these and many other examples, the life and times of Dwight Eisenhower came alive with strong examples of the ideals the man held and how he led in some of America’s most troubled times. Ike was a unifier and a man who sought to pull America together, rather than dismantle it and rebuild it in his own image. While backstabbing and Twitter shaming is the way things are done today, making America truly great again would include looking at how a true leader led and the principles he cherished when doing so! Highly recommended to those who love presidential history, as well as the reader who finds enjoyment in quasi-biographical pieces of political and military leaders.
I have never considered myself a Republican supporter when it comes to presidential candidates, but Susan Eisenhower’s analysis of her grandfather’s life and leadership style surely make me think that Ike was a man I could have supported. He sought to get things done, whether he was on the battlefield, serving as a university executive, or serving as the Commander-in-Chief. Ike had a way about him that demanded respect without being belligerent about it and the man was keen to be successful, while still being humble. As Eisenhower puts it repeatedly, Ike wanted the best from everyone and would not accept any less. Strong and well-explained examples fill this book to extol not on the man’s greatness as a leader, but on his fast thinking and attempts to do what was best. Did he have those with whom he did not agree? Surely, like anyone would. Were there times that he knew what he wanted and did not think that other perspectives were the correct solution? Most definitely, but he would approach them from as calm and accepting a place as he could. Susan Eisenhower effectively presents her ideas in clear and concise manner, weaving together detailed histories of events to better educate the reader for better context, both from her own memory and those of countless others. Using scores of historical documents, letters, reports, and likely some interviews, Eisenhower brings her grandfather to life throughout this piece and makes the reader feel as though they might have known him as well. With a number of well-researched chapters, the reader is able to see Ike the man as well as the grandfather who helped shape the life of the author in many ways. There are some in positions of power who say they speak for the people and represent them effectively as the country’s leader. One need only look to some of the core values that emanate from this book and the truth emerges; it’s no comparison whatsoever!
Kudos, Madam Eisenhower, for this eye-opening piece that sold me numerous times on the strength of your grandfather’s leadership style. I cannot wait to find some of your other work to enjoy it as well!
Love/hate the review? An ever-growing collection of others appears at:
http://pecheyponderings.wordpress.com/
A Book for All Seasons, a different sort of Book Challenge: https://www.goodreads.com/group/show/...
While I do not know a great deal about Dwight ‘Ike’ Eisenhower, I did read a thoroughly captivating biography of the man a few years ago. This book caught my eye for two distinct reasons: I am always drawn to books about political leadership, and the author is Ike’s granddaughter. I wanted to see how Susan Eisenhower would depict her grandfather as a leader and what examples she would use to exemplify this throughout his time in the limelight. Ike was a man of many principles, though he was not without his flaws. The author effectively argues that while Ike had some ‘rough times’ at West Point as a cadet, Ike was always willing and eager to see the best in people and sought to challenges textbook solutions by finding innovative ways that would be inclusive, not simply a ‘command response’. While a long-time military man, Ike respected forthrightness and those who would speak plainly to him, rather than pussyfoot around. The author offers a number of examples from his military days, including D-Day plans. This worked well into his years as president, as Ike was always open to ideas, though he could not stand empty sentiments. The author also presents Ike as blurring the line between political and apolitical, figuring that military life was devoid of partisan politics, so he did not see himself as holding a Democrat or Republican point of view. That being said, when Ike did land on one side of the political fence, he was more a centrist than a die-hard in either political spectrum. This middle of the road point of view allowed Ike to win the favour of many, as the author points out throughout, with some of his fiscal ideas, whereas the hardcore Republicans sought to bemoan his ideas as too soft. This all-encompassing point of view helped him gain the favour of others and get things done, presenting him as a president who acted as a Head of State and not simply Head of Government of of the Republicans, as many others did before him and continued thereafter. Ike was also fond of steering clear of dictating how things needed to be on an international scale when he reached the White House. As the author shows, Ike’s role in the Cold War was not to attack and demean the communist Soviets, but rather to wish the best for the people and hope that they could find a political and social system that would permit them to progress. Ike always sought freedom over oppression, but he was not one to say that he had all the answers, which is quite telling at a time when some took time from their Senate offices to vilify those who did not fall into line with the ‘American way’. This hands-off approach also helped Ike to earn much respect, rather than appear to decide what ought to be and how ‘American greatness’ was the only way to be. Ike took what he thought America needed and tried his best to bring it to pass, but was respectful in his approaches. The Civil Rights movement was but one example of where Ike felt the pressure, both in Congress and from Southern governors, but he would not back down on the idea of integration. Through these and many other examples, the life and times of Dwight Eisenhower came alive with strong examples of the ideals the man held and how he led in some of America’s most troubled times. Ike was a unifier and a man who sought to pull America together, rather than dismantle it and rebuild it in his own image. While backstabbing and Twitter shaming is the way things are done today, making America truly great again would include looking at how a true leader led and the principles he cherished when doing so! Highly recommended to those who love presidential history, as well as the reader who finds enjoyment in quasi-biographical pieces of political and military leaders.
I have never considered myself a Republican supporter when it comes to presidential candidates, but Susan Eisenhower’s analysis of her grandfather’s life and leadership style surely make me think that Ike was a man I could have supported. He sought to get things done, whether he was on the battlefield, serving as a university executive, or serving as the Commander-in-Chief. Ike had a way about him that demanded respect without being belligerent about it and the man was keen to be successful, while still being humble. As Eisenhower puts it repeatedly, Ike wanted the best from everyone and would not accept any less. Strong and well-explained examples fill this book to extol not on the man’s greatness as a leader, but on his fast thinking and attempts to do what was best. Did he have those with whom he did not agree? Surely, like anyone would. Were there times that he knew what he wanted and did not think that other perspectives were the correct solution? Most definitely, but he would approach them from as calm and accepting a place as he could. Susan Eisenhower effectively presents her ideas in clear and concise manner, weaving together detailed histories of events to better educate the reader for better context, both from her own memory and those of countless others. Using scores of historical documents, letters, reports, and likely some interviews, Eisenhower brings her grandfather to life throughout this piece and makes the reader feel as though they might have known him as well. With a number of well-researched chapters, the reader is able to see Ike the man as well as the grandfather who helped shape the life of the author in many ways. There are some in positions of power who say they speak for the people and represent them effectively as the country’s leader. One need only look to some of the core values that emanate from this book and the truth emerges; it’s no comparison whatsoever!
Kudos, Madam Eisenhower, for this eye-opening piece that sold me numerous times on the strength of your grandfather’s leadership style. I cannot wait to find some of your other work to enjoy it as well!
Love/hate the review? An ever-growing collection of others appears at:
http://pecheyponderings.wordpress.com/
A Book for All Seasons, a different sort of Book Challenge: https://www.goodreads.com/group/show/...
August 10, 2020
I have a tiny bit of knowledge about Eisenhower. What I do know of him I respected. After reading this book, I have become a true fan. He ruled with a methodical mind set. He analyzed situations and did not let his emotions rule him.
This may have made people question his decisions at times but it also made him a great ruler. I think like Eisenhower, so I could relate to him. What you also have to respect about Eisenhower is the fact that he was not afraid to admit when he was wrong and take responsibility.
In today's world that is hard to come by. It is easier for people to lay the blame on other's then to take full responsibility. It is time that we take pages from our history books and apply what great leaders like Eisenhower did to present day. Historical buffs will thoroughly enjoy reading this book. I know I sure did.
This may have made people question his decisions at times but it also made him a great ruler. I think like Eisenhower, so I could relate to him. What you also have to respect about Eisenhower is the fact that he was not afraid to admit when he was wrong and take responsibility.
In today's world that is hard to come by. It is easier for people to lay the blame on other's then to take full responsibility. It is time that we take pages from our history books and apply what great leaders like Eisenhower did to present day. Historical buffs will thoroughly enjoy reading this book. I know I sure did.
August 10, 2020
How Ike Led is a short introduction to several of the difficult decisions Dwight D. Eisenhower made over the course of his military and political life. As the title states, an evaluation of the decisions is not the focus, but a look at the foundational principles of the man that influenced each decision he needed to make. There are few books that micro-focus on President Eisenhower in such a manner, and certainly none by someone as close as his granddaughter, author Susan Eisenhower.
Eisenhower utilizes familial knowledge, interviews with Eisenhower's colleagues, reflection from personal documents, and more to do just what she set out to do with this book. What she accomplishes is a book that looks at integrity, determination, flexibility, and above all personal responsibility that D. Eisenhower used to guide his decisions throughout his career.
Overall, this is a well-written insightful work that looks, however briefly, into the whys of Eisenhower's biggest decisions as well as showing what a successful military and presidential leader should strive to focus on--Personal responsibility with Country over party and authority always. I would recommend this to anyone looking to learn more about history or interested in human nature.
Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for the dARC of this work in exchange for my honest review.
Eisenhower utilizes familial knowledge, interviews with Eisenhower's colleagues, reflection from personal documents, and more to do just what she set out to do with this book. What she accomplishes is a book that looks at integrity, determination, flexibility, and above all personal responsibility that D. Eisenhower used to guide his decisions throughout his career.
Overall, this is a well-written insightful work that looks, however briefly, into the whys of Eisenhower's biggest decisions as well as showing what a successful military and presidential leader should strive to focus on--Personal responsibility with Country over party and authority always. I would recommend this to anyone looking to learn more about history or interested in human nature.
Thank you to NetGalley and the publisher for the dARC of this work in exchange for my honest review.
March 18, 2022
Very good book about Ike’s leadership style and his political life. Written by his granddaughter, it brings a up close and personal view in his decision-making process. His “Middle of the road approach” to the problems facing the country truly made him one of the great presidents of our country. He would be a fish out of water today. For example: Ike’s belief that the Supreme Court membership “should represent diverse ideological points of view”. Ike nominated a democrat for the Supreme Court. That would be unheard of today.
Another one of his beliefs, “The only way to make progress, Eisenhower asserted, is compromise, conciliation and persuasion.” For six years of his presidency Congress was in the hands of the democratic party, yet he got 80% of his legislative agenda through Congress. Will we ever return to that way of governing again? Highly recommended
Another one of his beliefs, “The only way to make progress, Eisenhower asserted, is compromise, conciliation and persuasion.” For six years of his presidency Congress was in the hands of the democratic party, yet he got 80% of his legislative agenda through Congress. Will we ever return to that way of governing again? Highly recommended
September 2, 2021
Mark Twain said that although history rarely repeats itself, it often rhymes. I was surprised by the similarities between the domestic and international situations that President Eisenhower faced in the 1950s with those that affect us today. From the invasion of Normandy to entering the Oval Office, from overthrowing international threats to laying the foundation for civil rights, Dwight Eisenhower led by principle and character and showed the world not only what a true man is, but what all leaders should strive to be. His “middle way” was no compromise; rather, his way of unification, teamwork, and seeing the other side provided stability, progress, and growth. His desk plate gives the key to his successful leadership: “gently in manner, strongly in deed.” I want to be like Ike!
January 13, 2024
Number 34 is one of my favorite people to read about and try to learn the qualities of leadership he taught by example. One impressive episode is how he dealt with the dramatic McCarthy situation by never, not once, uttering the name of the headline-seeking senator and letting McCarthy set himself up for disaster rather than giving any lambasting statements to the press over his “red scare” theatrics and denying McCarthy the publicity he so ardently craved.
Ike > McCarthyism = canceled
Ike > McCarthyism = canceled
March 27, 2025
Great information from an interesting perspective. After reading this, Eisenhower is one of my favorite presidents.
October 11, 2020
Still my favorite President. I enjoyed Susan's unique point of view as both Ike's granddaughter and an expert on leadership.
September 30, 2020
Some interesting anecdotes, but not a great biography of a great leader.
May 6, 2020
This book presents an insightful and revealing view of General and President Dwight D. Eisenhower and how he led in war and in peace. It is written from both professional and personal perspectives The personal perspective is that of both a leader, consultant, author as well as Eisenhower’s granddaughter, being able to share stories, perhaps stories only she can tell, from her own experiences and those from colleagues of Eisenhower told to her.
The book is not intended as a comprehensive history/biography of her grandfather. Rather she has identified key episodes in Eisenhower’s life that exhibit his leadership and relatedly his humanity, in particular his caring for people, those who worked for him as well as those he just met.
Through these episodes, the author makes a very strong case that Eisenhower, as President, guided the country in international engagement for the US security benefit, set the stage for country-wide racial integration through integrating the federal government, and transitioned the economy from a war footing to a peace footing, that looked forward with technology as well as reigning the demands of the military.
Below I have listed some examples and attributes of his leadership. But let me focus on two issues, both from his farewell address on January 17, 1961: The first a warning about the military-industrial complex (which I knew about, and has been well documented in film “Why We Fight”) and the second about taking the long-view sustainable stewardship which is so compelling for our time:
• “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” He called for balance “in and among national programs,” and he offered a stern warning about profligate spending, emphasizing the importance of sustainable stewardship:
• “As we peer into society’s future, we—you and I—and our government must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.” (p 251)
In addition, one more clear theme that emerges from this book is that Ike was focused on the long-term, as illustrated with the issue of sustainable stewardship. But I think this point is more substantial. He would be guided by long-term goals, and would often have to take the “hit” of the short-term political cost, that would appear in press or from Congress. One example is making space weapon free, which involved winning the trust of the Soviet Union on this matter, and not over-reacting to the launch of Sputnik, and what his critics called a “missile gap” (he had other information which we could not disclose). Often, he would say nothing in defense of his actions, which gave him the appearance of getting old or too infirmed to lead (he had suffered a heart attack and a bout of ileitis).
Eisenhower’s intent for his presidency was to bring the country together, to find a “middle way”, keeping the extremes from taking over the public conversation on issues, be they the military clamoring for more funding, or politicians pushing back against his plans to move forward rules for desegregation.
Chapter 8, Ike’s Rule for Good Governance, is a clear summary of Eisenhower’s approach to the presidency, and the roles and relationships between the three branches of the US government: Executive, Legislative and Judicial: The judicial should be independent and balanced (and he appointed people of both parties); the legislative, was a co-equal branch, had its responsibilities but also was composed of people whom he would meet with throughout his tenure (of both parties); and the executive, which he would delegate responsibilities and hope people accountable, and ensure everyone was involved in key policy discussions. With the public, he wanted to be as transparent as possible. The role of the president was to “unify the country. Since national unity was arguably his highest priority, it was from this point of view that he tackled his job for eight years.” (p 122). … “As the strategic leader the president had to balance and integrate the overall goals and policies of his administration. Ultimately he would be the one to ensure policy coherence and keep his administration and the country on a steady course.” (p 127)
A few small excerpts from the book on leadership ideas and principles:
• Delegation: Gen.Goodpaster recounted that he once said to President Eisenhower: “It must take guts to delegate.” Eisenhower’s reply was to quote the nineteenth-century German general Helmuth von Moltke, who said: “Centralization is the refuge of fear.” (p 127)
• Progress: The only way to make progress, Eisenhower asserted, is “compromise, conciliation and persuasion.” (p 130)
• Give Credit: Ike did not say at press conferences, “I have directed the Secretary,” but rather, “I have approved the Secretary’s proposal.” (p 131)
• Collaborate: As Eisenhower once said: “It is better to have one person working with you than three working for you.” (p 131)
• Own the error, get the facts out: Eisenhower had “two fundamental rules he used in the Army that always worked well,” Hagerty noted. The president shared his thoughts on them not long after the start of the administration. Hagerty was told:
o “[One], if an error [is] made, admit it in detail and spell it out so that it [tells] the complete story of the error, and two, . . . show a plan for preventing the recurrence of any such error. Then stand your ground. Be dignified but tough. Say it was an error. Say it won’t happen again and don’t say anything else. [And three,] Don’t try to be cute or cover up. If you do, you will get so entangled you won’t know what you’re doing.”36
o He was also insistent that it is good policy to “get the facts out.” (p 131)
• Own the error: “I am not going to shift the blame to my underlings.” (p 244)
Throughout the book there are many stories of his kindness to others. He seemed to have time to write back to people, whether writing to a widow of a veteran, to sharing his birthday cake with his granddaughter’s teacher, also named Ike. And he was always interested in learning, from anyone, even the son of one of his staff who taught him how to weave with gimp.
I also learned that he kept a diary, was the president of Columbia University, helped start NATO, among what we know him for. He also did not want the US to engage in Vietnam, although evidently did send funds.
Why did the author write such a book, and why now? I can suggest a couple of reasons. First, it seems that the image of President Eisenhower has undergone a transformation over the last several years. As noted by the author, “Ike’s critics lacerated the president in his last years for his so-called do-nothing ways, culminating in a poll of historians, initiated by Kennedy friend and Harvard University professor Arthur Schlesinger Sr., ranking presidential greatness. Dwight Eisenhower stood twenty-eighth among the thirty-three presidents. … And today, he is ranked fifth in a poll of presidential historians.3 (p 253). I also note that C-Span has a presidential ranking an a book associated with it, see https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurve.... In the c-span account Eisenhower is rated after Lincoln, Washington FDR, Theodore Roosevelt. I would not have expected this before reading the book.
But in the Epilogue, the author addresses the why now question quite forcefully. We are suffering from a lack of leadership, or a twisted sense of it. One only has to read the review above, on Eisenhower’s approach and principles, to see the opposite being practiced today. Below I quote extensively from this portion of the book. But let me end with the following quote from the book.
“Our country urgently needs, again, a sense of national purpose and a vision for the future—and a commitment, I can still hear my grandfather say, to ‘leave the place better than you found it.’” (p 273)
A final comment: There are other books on Presidential leadership, such as Leadership in Turbulent Times by Doris Kearns Goodwin or Presidents of War: The Epic Story, from 1807 to Modern Times, by Michael Beschloss. I have not read these. Although the author does not cite these at all, I believe her focus on a story perhaps only she can tell. She has done that extremely well.
Excerpts from Epilogue
“The greatest virtue in civic life—and the ultimate factor determining political stability—has always been principled moderation, whatever the epoch,” the public intellectual Robert D. Kaplan has observed. “The rarest and bravest of leaders” are the moderates—who stand against extremists—“the purveyors of rage and passion.” (p 268)
I struggle today to retain the kind of optimism my grandfather would want to see in me, but I am determined to remain positive. As he would always say: “You’ve got to be for something” (not just be against what already exists). (p 268)
In essence we have a leadership crisis that actually favors factionalism, lack of accountability, and a complete misreading of what real leadership is. This is the other most urgent issue facing our nation. Before the crisis of September 11, 2001, our country still had some notion that leadership is the capacity to bring people along as one, while sustaining a dogged focus on a national goal. To do this requires exercising agility and flexibility in order to reach that point. If a leader truly has the nation’s best interests at heart, then compromise is the only key to progress: No one group of Americans has a lock on the truth. (p 270)
Today we have defined leadership as “standing your ground and digging in your heels,” lest one look weak. If that is leadership, then civility is all but unattainable and there is no prospect for fostering national unity. In this light our citizens’ differing views can only be cast as zero-sum confrontations, and a welcome sight to our adversaries. (p 270)
Strength, whether personal or national, derives from many other things too. Among them: the impulse to be fair and the willingness to be accountable. No true state of adulthood can really be achieved unless accountability is fully embraced. And no leader’s power is legitimate without it. (p 271)
Eisenhower was a constitutionalist who believed that the only way democracy can function is through governing practices based on principles rather than political expediency. He was a strategic leader who understood that the big themes are the ones that should drive organization, and that such a leader must be focused on the present while anticipating the future. (p 271)
Disclaimer: I was invited to review a pre-publication version of this book by St Martin’s Press. I wish to express my thanks for this opportunity.
The book is not intended as a comprehensive history/biography of her grandfather. Rather she has identified key episodes in Eisenhower’s life that exhibit his leadership and relatedly his humanity, in particular his caring for people, those who worked for him as well as those he just met.
Through these episodes, the author makes a very strong case that Eisenhower, as President, guided the country in international engagement for the US security benefit, set the stage for country-wide racial integration through integrating the federal government, and transitioned the economy from a war footing to a peace footing, that looked forward with technology as well as reigning the demands of the military.
Below I have listed some examples and attributes of his leadership. But let me focus on two issues, both from his farewell address on January 17, 1961: The first a warning about the military-industrial complex (which I knew about, and has been well documented in film “Why We Fight”) and the second about taking the long-view sustainable stewardship which is so compelling for our time:
• “In the councils of government, we must guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex. The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists and will persist.” He called for balance “in and among national programs,” and he offered a stern warning about profligate spending, emphasizing the importance of sustainable stewardship:
• “As we peer into society’s future, we—you and I—and our government must avoid the impulse to live only for today, plundering, for our own ease and convenience, the precious resources of tomorrow. We cannot mortgage the material assets of our grandchildren without risking the loss also of their political and spiritual heritage. We want democracy to survive for all generations to come, not to become the insolvent phantom of tomorrow.” (p 251)
In addition, one more clear theme that emerges from this book is that Ike was focused on the long-term, as illustrated with the issue of sustainable stewardship. But I think this point is more substantial. He would be guided by long-term goals, and would often have to take the “hit” of the short-term political cost, that would appear in press or from Congress. One example is making space weapon free, which involved winning the trust of the Soviet Union on this matter, and not over-reacting to the launch of Sputnik, and what his critics called a “missile gap” (he had other information which we could not disclose). Often, he would say nothing in defense of his actions, which gave him the appearance of getting old or too infirmed to lead (he had suffered a heart attack and a bout of ileitis).
Eisenhower’s intent for his presidency was to bring the country together, to find a “middle way”, keeping the extremes from taking over the public conversation on issues, be they the military clamoring for more funding, or politicians pushing back against his plans to move forward rules for desegregation.
Chapter 8, Ike’s Rule for Good Governance, is a clear summary of Eisenhower’s approach to the presidency, and the roles and relationships between the three branches of the US government: Executive, Legislative and Judicial: The judicial should be independent and balanced (and he appointed people of both parties); the legislative, was a co-equal branch, had its responsibilities but also was composed of people whom he would meet with throughout his tenure (of both parties); and the executive, which he would delegate responsibilities and hope people accountable, and ensure everyone was involved in key policy discussions. With the public, he wanted to be as transparent as possible. The role of the president was to “unify the country. Since national unity was arguably his highest priority, it was from this point of view that he tackled his job for eight years.” (p 122). … “As the strategic leader the president had to balance and integrate the overall goals and policies of his administration. Ultimately he would be the one to ensure policy coherence and keep his administration and the country on a steady course.” (p 127)
A few small excerpts from the book on leadership ideas and principles:
• Delegation: Gen.Goodpaster recounted that he once said to President Eisenhower: “It must take guts to delegate.” Eisenhower’s reply was to quote the nineteenth-century German general Helmuth von Moltke, who said: “Centralization is the refuge of fear.” (p 127)
• Progress: The only way to make progress, Eisenhower asserted, is “compromise, conciliation and persuasion.” (p 130)
• Give Credit: Ike did not say at press conferences, “I have directed the Secretary,” but rather, “I have approved the Secretary’s proposal.” (p 131)
• Collaborate: As Eisenhower once said: “It is better to have one person working with you than three working for you.” (p 131)
• Own the error, get the facts out: Eisenhower had “two fundamental rules he used in the Army that always worked well,” Hagerty noted. The president shared his thoughts on them not long after the start of the administration. Hagerty was told:
o “[One], if an error [is] made, admit it in detail and spell it out so that it [tells] the complete story of the error, and two, . . . show a plan for preventing the recurrence of any such error. Then stand your ground. Be dignified but tough. Say it was an error. Say it won’t happen again and don’t say anything else. [And three,] Don’t try to be cute or cover up. If you do, you will get so entangled you won’t know what you’re doing.”36
o He was also insistent that it is good policy to “get the facts out.” (p 131)
• Own the error: “I am not going to shift the blame to my underlings.” (p 244)
Throughout the book there are many stories of his kindness to others. He seemed to have time to write back to people, whether writing to a widow of a veteran, to sharing his birthday cake with his granddaughter’s teacher, also named Ike. And he was always interested in learning, from anyone, even the son of one of his staff who taught him how to weave with gimp.
I also learned that he kept a diary, was the president of Columbia University, helped start NATO, among what we know him for. He also did not want the US to engage in Vietnam, although evidently did send funds.
Why did the author write such a book, and why now? I can suggest a couple of reasons. First, it seems that the image of President Eisenhower has undergone a transformation over the last several years. As noted by the author, “Ike’s critics lacerated the president in his last years for his so-called do-nothing ways, culminating in a poll of historians, initiated by Kennedy friend and Harvard University professor Arthur Schlesinger Sr., ranking presidential greatness. Dwight Eisenhower stood twenty-eighth among the thirty-three presidents. … And today, he is ranked fifth in a poll of presidential historians.3 (p 253). I also note that C-Span has a presidential ranking an a book associated with it, see https://www.c-span.org/presidentsurve.... In the c-span account Eisenhower is rated after Lincoln, Washington FDR, Theodore Roosevelt. I would not have expected this before reading the book.
But in the Epilogue, the author addresses the why now question quite forcefully. We are suffering from a lack of leadership, or a twisted sense of it. One only has to read the review above, on Eisenhower’s approach and principles, to see the opposite being practiced today. Below I quote extensively from this portion of the book. But let me end with the following quote from the book.
“Our country urgently needs, again, a sense of national purpose and a vision for the future—and a commitment, I can still hear my grandfather say, to ‘leave the place better than you found it.’” (p 273)
A final comment: There are other books on Presidential leadership, such as Leadership in Turbulent Times by Doris Kearns Goodwin or Presidents of War: The Epic Story, from 1807 to Modern Times, by Michael Beschloss. I have not read these. Although the author does not cite these at all, I believe her focus on a story perhaps only she can tell. She has done that extremely well.
Excerpts from Epilogue
“The greatest virtue in civic life—and the ultimate factor determining political stability—has always been principled moderation, whatever the epoch,” the public intellectual Robert D. Kaplan has observed. “The rarest and bravest of leaders” are the moderates—who stand against extremists—“the purveyors of rage and passion.” (p 268)
I struggle today to retain the kind of optimism my grandfather would want to see in me, but I am determined to remain positive. As he would always say: “You’ve got to be for something” (not just be against what already exists). (p 268)
In essence we have a leadership crisis that actually favors factionalism, lack of accountability, and a complete misreading of what real leadership is. This is the other most urgent issue facing our nation. Before the crisis of September 11, 2001, our country still had some notion that leadership is the capacity to bring people along as one, while sustaining a dogged focus on a national goal. To do this requires exercising agility and flexibility in order to reach that point. If a leader truly has the nation’s best interests at heart, then compromise is the only key to progress: No one group of Americans has a lock on the truth. (p 270)
Today we have defined leadership as “standing your ground and digging in your heels,” lest one look weak. If that is leadership, then civility is all but unattainable and there is no prospect for fostering national unity. In this light our citizens’ differing views can only be cast as zero-sum confrontations, and a welcome sight to our adversaries. (p 270)
Strength, whether personal or national, derives from many other things too. Among them: the impulse to be fair and the willingness to be accountable. No true state of adulthood can really be achieved unless accountability is fully embraced. And no leader’s power is legitimate without it. (p 271)
Eisenhower was a constitutionalist who believed that the only way democracy can function is through governing practices based on principles rather than political expediency. He was a strategic leader who understood that the big themes are the ones that should drive organization, and that such a leader must be focused on the present while anticipating the future. (p 271)
Disclaimer: I was invited to review a pre-publication version of this book by St Martin’s Press. I wish to express my thanks for this opportunity.
March 24, 2024
This well-researched and thoughtful biography about Eisenhower written by his granddaughter was well worth the read. Some readers might be skeptical that she’d tailor an unfairly favorable portrayal of Eisenhower. This reluctance is unwarranted because there are quite a few criticisms from members of his own party and his opponents. Another suspicion readers might have is that since the subject of this novel is her grandfather she’d intentionally fill it with familial anecdotes that she could connect with. While there are some anecdotes include throughout the book, they are not overpowering enough to distract from the chapter they are included in.
The decision to organize the book using “principles” instead of a life timeline allowed for a narrative that did not adhere to a linear timeline. Framing the book using characteristics allowed the subject to come to life more than if a rigid timeline mattered. Ike’s Rules For Good Governance and Establishing a Beachhead were two principles that stood out. While these principles focus on the inner workings of his leadership, Establishing the Beachhead discusses it from the policy side of the equation.
The epilogue was the best part of the book. The quote from President Johnson that opens the chapter will stop readers in their tracks. It will shock them because the genuine respect he expressed for his predecessor from the opposing party is nothing we would see in today’s hostile political climate. Eisenhower’s musings about her hope for America to find its way back to the values that it once held dear are not those of a cynical grandparent but those of someone who is hopeful for the future of this country.
The decision to organize the book using “principles” instead of a life timeline allowed for a narrative that did not adhere to a linear timeline. Framing the book using characteristics allowed the subject to come to life more than if a rigid timeline mattered. Ike’s Rules For Good Governance and Establishing a Beachhead were two principles that stood out. While these principles focus on the inner workings of his leadership, Establishing the Beachhead discusses it from the policy side of the equation.
The epilogue was the best part of the book. The quote from President Johnson that opens the chapter will stop readers in their tracks. It will shock them because the genuine respect he expressed for his predecessor from the opposing party is nothing we would see in today’s hostile political climate. Eisenhower’s musings about her hope for America to find its way back to the values that it once held dear are not those of a cynical grandparent but those of someone who is hopeful for the future of this country.
September 19, 2022
Ike was an emotional man who never made emotional decisions. His leadership style, especially in the political space, could and should be modeled by all who lead.
Dwight Eisenhower was a president who cared more about the country than he did his own reputation. He made decisions that looked bad personally but benefitted more than just himself. His decisions were based on facts. He appointed strong debaters on both sides to duke out the argument and then he'd lock himself away and make a decision based on what he heard. Ike knew what decisions to prioritize. He refused to get flustered over low-level decisions but focused on the decisions that mattered to him. In one instance when attacked by political opponent Joe McCarthy, Ike refused to acknowledge McCarthy, thus denying him the recognition he wanted. He sought a middle way, always looking for alliances across political lines rather than being devoted to party lines.
As a person, Ike held a keen interest in all people. He built rapport with the electricians and gardeners and was a fond gift giver. When things went right, Ike refused to take credit for anything and shifted it to his team. When it went bad, he always took the blame.
It's an interesting read for anyone interested in leadership modeled well, especially in a political environment.
Dwight Eisenhower was a president who cared more about the country than he did his own reputation. He made decisions that looked bad personally but benefitted more than just himself. His decisions were based on facts. He appointed strong debaters on both sides to duke out the argument and then he'd lock himself away and make a decision based on what he heard. Ike knew what decisions to prioritize. He refused to get flustered over low-level decisions but focused on the decisions that mattered to him. In one instance when attacked by political opponent Joe McCarthy, Ike refused to acknowledge McCarthy, thus denying him the recognition he wanted. He sought a middle way, always looking for alliances across political lines rather than being devoted to party lines.
As a person, Ike held a keen interest in all people. He built rapport with the electricians and gardeners and was a fond gift giver. When things went right, Ike refused to take credit for anything and shifted it to his team. When it went bad, he always took the blame.
It's an interesting read for anyone interested in leadership modeled well, especially in a political environment.
December 18, 2023
If there were half stars, I would give it 2 and a half. We decided to read this book as part of our presidential book club, because we had come off of multiple 800 page plus books and wanted something a little shorter. While I found it fascinating to read about Eisenhower, i was not thoroughly impressed with the writer. Being his granddaughter, I would’ve expected more intimate stories and examples. I also found her constant and convenient explanation of any criticism to be discrediting. This is not a critical assessment of his presidency, and she goes to great extents to defend anything negative anyone ever said about him. She brings up Emmet Till, but never touched on the letter his mother wrote Eisenhower, that he never responded to. She is not comfortable being critical at all, which I found to be annoying at times. Overall; I’m not sure what her thesis really was, as she didn’t do a great job laying it out. I don’t think she added anything really new that other books don’t have, but I understand the emotional and personal pull for her to write the book. Not awful, but not great.
April 4, 2022
Ever since I was a young teenager, Dwight D. “Ike” Eisenhower has been one of my heroes. Over the years I’ve read many books, by Eisenhower and about him. I recently finished reading a new (2020) book written by his granddaughter, Susan Eisenhower, “How Ike Led: The Principles Behind Eisenhower’s Biggest Decisions.” I really enjoyed it. Well written it brings out the best of Ike. Here are a few quotes from the book: “... there is a curious factor in successfully providing consequential leadership. Authenticity is important. . .”; “... countless things [Ike] did for people who could do nothing for him.” “To Ike strength came from putting his own house in order, by exercising self-disciple and putting others first and inspiring them to take up the cause as their own.” And finally, a quote from Ike: “We are taking counsel of our fears when we should indoctrinate ourselves that there is such a thing as common sense. . .”
It seems to me that today we desperately need the kind of leadership Ike provided.
It seems to me that today we desperately need the kind of leadership Ike provided.
June 13, 2020
This book is written by Eisenhower's granddaughter and brings a more intimate view of his decision making than other biographies that I have read. Her writing style is one that flows easily making it an interesting and enjoyable read. Ike's approach to decision making led many to underestimate his capabilities especially while he was president. The bottom line is that his detractors could not shake the faith that the american people had in him as our leader during trying times. I recommend this book to anyone who has an interest in presidential biographies and Eisenhower in particular.
I received a free Kindle copy of this book courtesy of NetGalley and the publisher with the understanding that I would post a review on Net Galley, Goodreads, Amazon and my nonfiction book review blog. I also posted it to my Facebook page.
I received a free Kindle copy of this book courtesy of NetGalley and the publisher with the understanding that I would post a review on Net Galley, Goodreads, Amazon and my nonfiction book review blog. I also posted it to my Facebook page.
January 21, 2021
Susan Eisenhower had a tough task writing this book, and she handled it well. She acknowledges in the intro that this is not an actual biography of her grandfather. I struggled with her selection of content because I wanted more of the dimension and feeling of a traditional bio. However, I acknowledge that would have ruined her focus of the book. As I finished the book, I had come to respect and appreciate why she selected the things she did. Susan does acknowledge President Eisenhower's critics along the way, although I found myself wanting to know more of where they were coming from. The principles of Ike's leadership that Susan exposes truly are timely as we face the mess the U.S. is in today. I think I will need to read this book again after I have read a lot more of the history surrounding Eisenhower's public life.
February 24, 2025
I could give a whole essay about this book and why it solidifies Eisenhower as one of my favorite U.S. presidents. I appreciate Susan Eisenhower’s analysis of her grandfather’s leadership during his incredible career. From helping to create momentum for civil/equal rights, navigating 8 years of peace after the Korean War, balancing the budget, heroics during WWII, and so many more examples, his servant leadership, pragmatism, compassion, and humility is on full display. Great book on leadership. Great brief biography.
March 6, 2024
A great perspective from the granddaughter of Ike. We learn as she does the strategic, human caring nature of leadership that Ike led with. His believe for patience and the “middle way” are present through all his decision makings in life. The book leaves you with An inspiration and guide for a better world. It also provides a guide for leadership in any form of work.
September 17, 2020
Audiobook narrated by Bernadette Dunne, and bought from Audible.
More a book on how to inspire the best from others for the greater good of all than a biography, I wish that our current leaders took heed.
More a book on how to inspire the best from others for the greater good of all than a biography, I wish that our current leaders took heed.
December 4, 2022
This. Was. So. Good! If there were a fifth face on Mount Rushmore, surely it should be Eisenhower!
(So good I read it twice!)
(So good I read it twice!)
September 2, 2023
Really interesting book - I haven’t read much about Ike before (FDR and Truman had previously dominated my shelves).
The boys was I got to meet the author and chat with her, big about current events like Ukraine and our Russian partnership with the ISS, and about her childhood with grandpa at the Eisenhower farm.
The boys was I got to meet the author and chat with her, big about current events like Ukraine and our Russian partnership with the ISS, and about her childhood with grandpa at the Eisenhower farm.
October 8, 2021
Særdeles god bok om en av moderne tids største ledere (tenk å få lede på D-dagen da).
Boken gir et grundig inntrykk av hvordan Ike tok beslutninger, hvor lenge han ventet, hvilke spørsmål han stilte, hvordan han formidlet.
Anbefalt lesing for alle som tar beslutninger.
Boken gir et grundig inntrykk av hvordan Ike tok beslutninger, hvor lenge han ventet, hvilke spørsmål han stilte, hvordan han formidlet.
Anbefalt lesing for alle som tar beslutninger.
April 9, 2024
More hagiography than leadership lessons. Still interesting.
February 24, 2025
4.5. Great book about a great man. Our current President could use Ike’s principles of character, strategy, and executive restraint.
August 12, 2020
Best work on Ike I have read. Susan curated an unique perspective.
November 30, 2020
Facts, great insight and a story about a truly good man. Many of our current so called leaders would benefit by reading and learning from this book.
July 25, 2022
Listened on audiobook for book club… could be quite boring at times but I do like ike a lot now
January 24, 2021
Extremism, obstinacy, and “scorched earth” have increasingly become fashionable in today’s public discourse. This book offers a much-needed (and very readable) intellectual antidote to the disgraceful rubbish that is rampant on social media, cable news, and within the halls of government.
Reading about Dwight Eisenhower’s thoughts on American society and his approach to leadership is like sitting through an excellent civics lesson. This lesson is one that we all NEED to study today. Ike was a self-avowed moderate who detested extremism. He rose to prominence as a Soldier, but he secured his claim to greatness as a statesman. What is perhaps most amazing is the fact that Ike accomplished all of this amid the chaos of World War II and at the dawn of the global struggle against totalitarian communism.
There is no doubt that Eisenhower’s example is valuable today. Although a reluctant politician, he decided to pursue the Presidency only after he saw the United States endangered by extremism on both sides of the partisan political divide. Ike embraced fiscal conservatism while almost single-handedly saving the GOP from a self-imposed death spiral of isolationism and retrenchment.
For me, the most compelling (and relevant) part of this book is the story of how Eisenhower took on the cancerous demagoguery of Joseph McCarthy. The Republican Party that he joined was in danger of being consumed by McCarthyism. Eisenhower began his battle against McCarthy’s lies in subtle ways, maneuvering behind the scenes to isolate the caustic Wisconsin senator. Ike understood the pernicious impact that men like McCarthy could have if left unchecked.
The value of this book lies not in exploring previously neglected or obscure aspects of Eisenhower’s legacy. The reader will need to look elsewhere for that. Instead, “How Ike Led” is a celebration of those things about Eisenhower that are well-established but increasingly rare today. It is reminder that compromise, moderation, and responsibility are key components of the American system of governance and civil society. This book should be required reading for every governmental official today, tomorrow, and forever.
Reading about Dwight Eisenhower’s thoughts on American society and his approach to leadership is like sitting through an excellent civics lesson. This lesson is one that we all NEED to study today. Ike was a self-avowed moderate who detested extremism. He rose to prominence as a Soldier, but he secured his claim to greatness as a statesman. What is perhaps most amazing is the fact that Ike accomplished all of this amid the chaos of World War II and at the dawn of the global struggle against totalitarian communism.
There is no doubt that Eisenhower’s example is valuable today. Although a reluctant politician, he decided to pursue the Presidency only after he saw the United States endangered by extremism on both sides of the partisan political divide. Ike embraced fiscal conservatism while almost single-handedly saving the GOP from a self-imposed death spiral of isolationism and retrenchment.
For me, the most compelling (and relevant) part of this book is the story of how Eisenhower took on the cancerous demagoguery of Joseph McCarthy. The Republican Party that he joined was in danger of being consumed by McCarthyism. Eisenhower began his battle against McCarthy’s lies in subtle ways, maneuvering behind the scenes to isolate the caustic Wisconsin senator. Ike understood the pernicious impact that men like McCarthy could have if left unchecked.
The value of this book lies not in exploring previously neglected or obscure aspects of Eisenhower’s legacy. The reader will need to look elsewhere for that. Instead, “How Ike Led” is a celebration of those things about Eisenhower that are well-established but increasingly rare today. It is reminder that compromise, moderation, and responsibility are key components of the American system of governance and civil society. This book should be required reading for every governmental official today, tomorrow, and forever.
December 15, 2020
This book is not intended as a detailed birth to death biography. It is, instead, a volume that provides the reader with insight on how and why he made decisions. Many notable examples of how his leadership style worked are provided from both his military career and his terms as President of the United States.
Dwight Eisenhower was not a man to be swayed by the opinion of others. He was a man of integrity, and someone who fully believed that he was responsible for his own choices. As a general, he looked at the overall picture before giving orders. As President, he was not swayed by party loyalty and would not hesitate to support the Democrats if he believed that their view was the better choice. As a leader, he did not hesitate to accept full responsibility for his actions.
His granddaughter, Susan Eisenhower, does an excellent job of supplying anecdotes as evidence of his leadership style. In addition to the historic perspective, she also notes that she also personally experienced the way his energy filled a room.
I cannot begin to select just a few examples of Ike’s leadership, and highly recommend that anyone interested in him (either as a military leader or as President) pick up this book. Older readers may recall some of the incidents mentioned. Whether you agree or disagree with him, the information shared about his perspective on each issue may provide some light on why he acted as he did.
My thanks to NetGalley for sending me an invitation to read this fascinating book. No promise of a positive review was requested or given. However, I do believe that readers, especially those with an interest in the military, political events, or history will find this book enlightening.
Dwight Eisenhower was not a man to be swayed by the opinion of others. He was a man of integrity, and someone who fully believed that he was responsible for his own choices. As a general, he looked at the overall picture before giving orders. As President, he was not swayed by party loyalty and would not hesitate to support the Democrats if he believed that their view was the better choice. As a leader, he did not hesitate to accept full responsibility for his actions.
His granddaughter, Susan Eisenhower, does an excellent job of supplying anecdotes as evidence of his leadership style. In addition to the historic perspective, she also notes that she also personally experienced the way his energy filled a room.
I cannot begin to select just a few examples of Ike’s leadership, and highly recommend that anyone interested in him (either as a military leader or as President) pick up this book. Older readers may recall some of the incidents mentioned. Whether you agree or disagree with him, the information shared about his perspective on each issue may provide some light on why he acted as he did.
My thanks to NetGalley for sending me an invitation to read this fascinating book. No promise of a positive review was requested or given. However, I do believe that readers, especially those with an interest in the military, political events, or history will find this book enlightening.
Displaying 1 - 30 of 132 reviews