It's my own fault, but I didn't realise this was just a compilation of articles written for the Irish Times and Guardian, and it really impacts the book when reading lengthier chunks. The lack of revisionism or hindsight bias competes with repeated themes and pithy phrases a few pages apart in forming my overall impression, and I think the repetition just wins out.
O'Toole is at least a decent columnist, talking about serious issues in a direct manner that is never too politically haughty and rarely boring. He does like to relate stories to classic novels perhaps a bit too often, and surely even regular readers of his columns got sick of the King Lear references even if they were months apart. Unless there was some serious editing (I'm not going to go back to check against his Guardian pieces) his characterisations are astute and have stood the test of time, and certainly give the impression he knows what he's talking about. The rise of the concept of English Nationlism is the sort of analysis I'd expected more of, a detached person's view on the underlying political swings.
Ultimately, this was a book and should be reviewed as one, and the repurposing of material is fine for columns in newspapers on different sides of the Irish Sea, but not great when read 3 pages apart. Lines like May building a brand on 'her personality when she hasn't got one' are only amusing the first time, and to be honest I didn't find his writing that funny despite the cover trading on such endorsement from his peers. Maybe you find criticism of Boris inherently funny, but why waste time reading serious thoughts when there are terrible memes on the internet that will do the same much more quickly?
As alluded to above, the positive of a column compendium is that these are real time thoughts rather than a hindsight-influenced narrative, so there is at least some intrigue in seeing whether my memory was playing tricks on me (and no, we really were that embarassing as a country). But the same repeated points on Northern Ireland's land and sea border implications didn't seem to add anything to the book and could have been cut in some places. It was an easy read, but it did have quite a bit of filler.
I expected a few things from this book, a slightly detached look at the UK, some sharp writing and a good story given the material. The wit wasn't enough to carry the similarities between some of the chapters, and as a result I thought it was a fairly average read, without the details and personilities of someone more connected like Tim Shipman, or the entertainment value of Marina Hyde.