As other reviewers have pointed out, the terminology in this book is largely outdated. In addition, the book is written for the insular, isolationist audience of pre-WW2 America, and so feels like it explains a bit too much to a reader that is part of the more modern, global readership. Numbers of adherents are also outdated, and the book is missing almost a century of modern scholarship on the origins and later history of the major world religions. This book is interesting more as a historical snapshot of how Americans viewed the rest of the world a hundred years ago than as an accurate introduction to the religions of the world. If you're more interested in the religious aspect, you'll be better served by looking elsewhere.
جملهی آخر کتاب این بود: «کوشش برای صلح-رسالت واقعی نوع بشر است»
کتاب پنج بخش داره، اول از آیین های هندوستان میگه، بعد آسیای شرقی، یهود، مسیحیت و اسلام در مورد محتوا و آموزهها و اهداف دینها خیلی خیلی خیلی محدود گفته، میشه گفت بیشتر کتاب مربوط به تاریخ دین هاست و اینکه مثلا چطوری به وجود اومدن و چی بر سرشون اومده از اونموقع تا امروز، اما مثل یه داستان روایت کرده و جزئیاتش از نظر تاریخی خیلی کمه (که به نظرم باعث میشه ارزش تاریخی خاصی هم نداشته باشه) چون داستانیه، خوندنش آسونه. لذت بخش بود و برای من که خیلی کم از دینها میدونستم و مشتاق بودم یکم آشنا بشم خوب بود، اما در کل کتاب خیلی قویای نبود.
I love this book because of its simplicity. The author presents all the pertinent information in brief paragraphs, without the usual long winded hyperbole that usually accompanies books on this subject.
اینقدر عادت کردم به خوندن کتابهای انگلیسی شستهرفته و تروتمیز که وقتی کتاب فارسی کروکثیف و زشت با اغلاط نگارشی و ویرایشی میبینم میخوام کتاب رو پرت کنم از پنجره بیرون.
اما کتاب خوشخوان بود پر از اطلاعات بدیهی مفید که به دونستنش میارزید.
This book proposes how the great religions began. It didn't treat any of the religions fairly.
Three ways of doing a book like this well would be 1) Document what can be proven historically, 2) Report what each of the religions say about themselves or 3) Some combination of the both.
Instead, this book uses hearsay and poorly known legends to report how the religions began.
For example, in the account of Judaism, there is a fascinating story about the origin of Abraham and his father. I had not come across the story before. It would be fascinating to hear where the story came from and if it is in fact true. Instead, the book simple reports that this happen. Is this an oral tradition? Is it a later day legend? What is the origin of the story? Rather than coming away more knowledgable about religions the book leaves the reader frustrated about what the sources of the information actually are.
Dated but interesting. Very US/western-centric (Christianity gets an entire second chapter at the end); I was initially disappointed that it only covered religions of the Middle East and East Asia, but by its own qualifier of “great,” I think these are the only ones that fit the bill on a global scale. Zoroastrianism may not quite fit, but it serves as an important bridge between the early religions and monotheism.
The mix of myths and historical facts is interesting but rarely well delineated.
It still serves as a nice quick-read overview for those interested in how the big names came to be; as a tool for authors writing a fictional religion I think this is a great guidebook; also for younger readers who really don’t know anything beyond American Christianity.