It's okay. It's just okay.
One of the big problems with books on leadership (and I think some might argue this for self-help books in general) is answering the question: is this book necessary? Not just necessary to read for your personal growth, but is it necessary to publish at all? Does it say anything that really needs to be said that hasn't been said before. And I think the answer to that question with this book is no.
The book isn't bad. It's a leadership book that definitely has some good nuggets of insight and direction if you need that. But I find the biggest stumbling blocks for this book are two things: 1) who even is the author and his experience, and 2) there is a shotgun blast of information instead of a concise direction for the book. For the first point, this won't be the first time I've read a book and didn't know anything about the author. But it's one instance where knowing the author, his experience, his successes, and his context REALLY could have helped. As a contrast, I finished reading Jocko Willink's book Extreme Ownership (loved it), and didn't know that much about the authors going in. But they did such a great job of telling their story and experiences, that you are invested in everything they say. With this book, I have no idea who Chad Veach is. Maybe there is a blurb on the back of the book, but listening to the audiobook, I barely heard anything in this book about who Veach is as an authority in this field. Maybe he is, but I wish I could have known more about the author and his authority to explain these principles. Otherwise it comes across as someone who can just google leadership advice and compile it into a book, making some cash without any real experience. Even if the principles are true, this goes to my initial question: did this book need to exist?
My second point, though, is my bigger criticism. For books that give advice, the temptation is to give as much information as you can because "more is better", right? But to a reader, more information becomes too much to internalize. Reading this book at times just made my head swim. It was an information overload, and much of the information wasn't pertinent to me at all. I think it would have been far better if the author had simplified his points down to just a few and then expanded his ideas in other books directed at more specific types of leaders. I don't need to know about the correct frequency of group meetings or about processes for quality control. Those are topics that should be for different books.
The writing is on par with writers of this ilk. It's passable, and it communicates. It's not mind-blowing, and it's not emotionally investing at all. There are numerous spots where the author clearly thought, "I should put a movie reference here," even though it barely made sense to do so. It's not great, but it's passable.
This book is okay. I don't think it's a book that is necessary to read if you are looking to improve your leadership. I think there are far better, more poignant, more memorable, and more applicable books out there on the topic.