Jackie, Ethel, Joan takes a different perspective on a worn narrative, focusing on the lives and relationships of the wives of Jack, Bobby, and Ted Kennedy. I have learned new things, which is no small feat considering the number of books about the Kennedys. But Taraborrelli also makes mistakes that can be fact-checked easily and it makes me question his credibility. For example:
• He gives Jackie’s birthday as July 29, when it was actually July 28.
• He mentions that, at 31, Jackie was the youngest First Lady ever. That distinction belongs to Frances Cleveland, who married the sitting president, Grover Cleveland, when she was 21.
• Likewise, he asserts that at 43, John F. Kennedy was the youngest President of the United States. That distinction belongs to Theodore Roosevelt, who became President at age 42 after the assassination of William McKinley.
• Jackie’s position at the Washington Times-Herald was called “Inquiring Camera Girl,” not “The Inquiring Photographer.”
• The surname of JFK’s speechwriter was Sorensen, not Sorenson.
• Jackie had a stillborn daughter after the Democratic National Convention in 1956, not 1957.
• Rosemary Kennedy was institutionalized immediately after the botched lobotomy in 1941, not 1949.
• Rose Fitzgerald Kennedy’s autobiography was called Times to Remember, not A Time to Remember.
• Aristotle Onassis died on 15 March 1975 in France, not 14 March 1974 in Greece. And he wasn’t an only child: he had a sister, Artemis, who later championed Jackie over Maria Callas, and two half-sisters.
• Eleanor Roosevelt died in 1962, not 1963.
• Taraborrelli mentions Lord Harlech and David Ormsby-Gore as if they were two different men, when in fact, Lord Harlech was Ormsby-Gore’s royal title.
There are also basic math errors, such as stating an incorrect age at a certain time (for example, Ethel Kennedy was 40 years old when Bobby was killed, not 38, etc.) It’s like neither Taraborrelli nor the editors (if there were any) could be bothered to make the minimal efforts with this book.
Taraborrelli also presents as fact events that no one can know for certain: by quoting Kenny O’Donnell, Frank Mankiewicz, and Joan Braden, he concludes that the idea of Bobby and Jackie having a romantic relationship was nonsense, just a rumour invented to hurt their reputations. But other people close to them had their suspicions, including Ethel. In his authoritative biography of Bobby, Evan Thomas doesn’t dismiss the possibility and leaves it open to the reader to decide for themselves.
If I sound like I think Bobby and Jackie had an affair, it’s because I do. But more importantly, biographers have to recognize that history is not always clear-cut and that some gaps in the records, particularly those in such a secretive family, will likely never be filled. You cannot sentence according to your personal beliefs.
In short, Jackie, Ethel, Joan is an enjoyable enough book. The prose is novelistic in style -complete with stilted dialogues almost certainly invented by the author-, which may put off readers who prefer an academic approach to nonfiction. It brings into the spotlight three women who have been dismissed but who played crucial roles in the careers of three of the most powerful men of the 20th century.