The Chambers Dictionary

by Chambers

The Chambers Dictionary is the latest edition of a dictionary long recognized as unique - Chambers Twentieth Century Dictionary. This new edition confirms and adds its own contribution to this status, the coverage, comprehensiveness and character of Chambers setting it apart as the best single-volume reference of the English language.

With 215 000 references and 300 000 definitions, Chambers reflects the richness and diversity of English from Chaucer to the present day - the sciences, commerce, the media, politics, the environment and many varieties of international English all represented in this treasury of words.

Chambers is a dictionary of unrivalled value to users of English - to students, scholars, writers, journalists, librarians, broadcasters and publishers. It has generous coverage of words of technical importance to scientists, lawyers, accountants and people in business.

Chambers is the official reference dictionary for the UK National Scrabble Championship; it is the favourite dictionary of crossword compilers and solvers; it is the source book for all wordgame players and word lovers.

Clear layout, easy-to-understand definitions, uncomplicated pronunciation guidance, scholarly explanations of word origins, helpful appendix sections - all are features of the most accessible of reference books, The Chambers Dictionary

Genres: Reference, Nonfiction, Language, Dictionaries, Writing

2080 pages, Hardcover

First published January 1, 1901

Reviews

[Lynne King · Rating 5 out of 5]

I came across a poll today stating underrated books and this book was included. I was dumbfounded when I saw this. How can you possibly exist without a dictionary, in fact several dictionaries.

This for me, as I'm English (UK), has to be the best and most informative. I have other dictionaries, of course, but I happen to prefer this one. My last copy got rather battered and so I replaced it last year. I like to feel my battered copy though and mostly return to that.

Yet again, how can this possibly be an underrated book? Bizarre...

[Manny · Rating 5 out of 5]

I'm not hopeless at languages, but one of my friends (let's call him G) totally puts me to shame. He speaks at least five fluently and can get by in several more. He's also got a remarkably good memory. Again, my memory isn't bad, but he leaves me standing.

Here's an anecdote to show how good he is. We were sitting around at a friend's place sometime in the 80s. I'm not sure how we got on to the subject of spelling, but G told us that he didn't need to check spellings. He just knew how words were spelled, that's all there was to it.

So, naturally, we were sceptical, and we thought we'd test his ability. We got out a copy of Chambers and looked around for a word that would be as obscure and hard to spell as possible. After a few minutes, we were sure we'd found the perfect candidate. We then had the following conversation:

- It's pronounced "prett".

- Ah. It must be a loan word?

- Yes.

- Hm. And it must have a silent letter?

- Yes.

- Right. Let me see ... (pause) ... M?

- Uh, yes.

- M-P-R-E-T.

He was right. It means "an Albanian monarch". I'd like to think he cheated somehow - the alternative is just too depressing to consider.

[Warwick · Rating 4 out of 5]

Probably the best single-volume dictionary around. Its mission to include more unusual words makes it a great browse as well.

It loses marks for me for its irritating home pronunciation system; and it's decidedly patchy on archaic or obsolete words and definitions. For a little more money I'd go for the 2-volume Shorter OED, which gives you IPA, much more detailed etymologies, supporting citations, and better coverage of obsolete words. As a single volume, though, this'll probably give you the most bang for your buck.

[Martin · Rating 5 out of 5]

In the event of my being marooned on a desert island and allowed only one book it would have to be a good dictionary... preferably this one.

[Waldo Varjak · Rating 5 out of 5]

Every edition of a dictionary tends to lose a few words as it gains many more. Some of the words that are lost have gone out of the language completely while others have been sacrificed to make space for modern words, like twerk. If there were ever a need for a dictionary it would be for these older ones like the New Edition 1983 Chambers 20th Century Dictionary; such dictionaries The Internet has no use for and where the feeling is mutual I am sure. These pre-twerking dictionaries that might describe a word like selfie as a cute way to express an egotistical personality.

Return to that innocent time in history when sexting was a misspelling of a word only a sailor took serious; and when misspellings were not socially acceptable on cell phones at schools across the world. Return to a world when reading or browsing through the dictionary was the literate equivalent of surfing. And when you return, you will discover the etymology and true meanings of words that have morphed from language to language like naughty elven changlings in an interspecies romance.

This is one such romance tale and it is a darn good one. Let its pages thrill you in response to your eager caress, and titillate you with Chambers’ renowned definitions that border on the heretical, like the definition for éclair, while still being part of the Scrabble™ high society. Let The Internet keep its definitions of twerking; you can have this naughty little secret exhibit itself on your lap and you can enjoy it even in public; especially in public.

[Peter]

The Only One for Day to Day Use: I've used Chambers for more than forty years and love it with a passion. I still pick it up and read it from time to time, once a week at least. If you think these two points qualify me to be sectioned, all I can say is you can't have had the use and pleasure out of it that I have. It has answered so many what-does-that-mean questions, and helped with so many crossword queries, and brought up so many obscure words for scrabble....... Try it.

I think Oxford has more or less abandoned the territory to Chambers - I mean, of one-volume, comprehensive, practical, day to day dictionaries. (The Concise seems to me to have gone downmarket, so to speak). But, of course, if what you're after is the definitive etymology, the history of the use of the word, the widest range of meanings over its history, then I think you're bound to go to the Shorter Oxford or the OED itself. But then, that's work

[Tattered Cover Book Store]

Chambers is my new favorite dictionary. If you, too, are the sort of person to have favorite dictionaries, you will quickly see why.

- Chris C.

[Just_me · Rating 5 out of 5]

It's huge but has more words than I will ever need and I use it all the time

[Suzy Espersen · Rating 5 out of 5]

This has to be the Bible for anyone working with or in any other way involved with the English language!

[Angela Brooks · Rating 5 out of 5]

My favourite lexicon. Not a fan of the OED, Chambers is less 'everywhere', quietly erudite, the older dictionary. I've marked it 'read' because there isn't a 'constantly reading'. :)

[Thomas Crow · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is my go-to dictionary. My father’s before me, and his father’s before him. We have a Family Rule when playing word-related board games, such as Scrabble or Boggle, that for a word to be valid, it must be listed in Chambers! I grew up with that rule and it has stuck. This rule even translates into the online version when we’re playing Boggle on holiday and don’t have access to the all-authoritative print version: https://chambers.co.uk/search/

[Rebecca · Rating 5 out of 5]

This is an excellent dictionary, with an extensive word list and lots of derivations when necessary. It also has a section full of interesting words, from the literary to corporate buzzwords. I like this dictionary, and it has a lot of what you need from a dictionary.

[Petalbooks]

[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chambers...]