What do you think?
Rate this book
Foxy #1
Foxy
This work has been selected by scholars as being culturally important and is part of the knowledge base of civilization as we know it. This work is in the public domain in the United States of America, and possibly other nations. Within the United States, you may freely copy and distribute this work, as no entity (individual or corporate) has a copyright on the body of the work. Scholars believe, and we concur, that this work is important enough to be preserved, reproduced, and made generally available to the public. To ensure a quality reading experience, this work has been proofread and republished using a format that seamlessly blends the original graphical elements with text in an easy-to-read typeface. We appreciate your support of the preservation process, and thank you for being an important part of keeping this knowledge alive and relevant.
120 pages, Paperback
First published January 1, 1959
45 people want to read
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews
January 17, 2020
When nine-year-old David leaves behind a happy home at a London orphanage for life with his new foster parents, Mr. and Mrs. Hedger, he isn't sure that he will enjoy living in the country, or ever feel at home at Great Wood Farm. Adjusting to life in rural Sussex, coping with being the new boy at a small village school, which he is surprised to discover is co-ed, David faces many challenges. Quick to notice that all the other children have pets, he asks Mr. Hedger for a dog, only to be told that having an animal is a great responsibility, and that he must wait. Then one day, on his way through the Great Wood, he stumbles across an abandoned fox cub and, encouraged by a passing man who strikes up a conversation, takes him home to raise him as a tame companion. After an initial period of keeping Foxy a secret, David is discovered, and he and his new vulpine companion are given their chance: if Foxy behaves - and stays away from the chickens, from which the Hedgers derive most of their income - then he can stay. Soon accepted at home and in the village, Foxy becomes an established part of David's life, and of life in the village of Woodmere... until the day the fox hunt comes through, and the tame fox becomes their prey. Will David loses his new friend, the being he has come to love above all others...?
Originally published in 1959, and then reprinted in this paperback edition in 1971, Foxy is a moving tale of a boy and his beloved fox companion. Immediately involving, it manages to convey the depth of David's feelings - riding on the train toward his new life with the Hedgers, praying to St. Francis for a dog, watching Foxy flee before the hounds - without ever veering into sentimentality. There is a lot to ponder in the story, which explores the relationship between humans and animals, and the ethical issues involved in hunting, while also obliquely examining the role of religion in a young person's life. The author takes a clear stand against sport hunting in the book, as evidenced by David's discussion of the issue, first with the stranger in the Wood, who describes fox hunting as "a cruel business," and then with Mr. Hedger, who considers it a holdover from 'primitive' times, before humans developed an affinity for animals, and were able to reason properly. While I find the latter argument rather unconvincing as an explanation for the persistence of sport hunting - I would think that ancient peoples had a greater affinity for animals than their modern counterparts, perhaps because they needed to hunt them more often - I was in sympathy with the feelings so evidently influencing it. Perhaps the most powerful condemnation of the practice of fox hunting comes at the end of the book, as David - and through him, the reader - must watch a beloved friend being hunted and (ostensibly) killed. Witnessing the many motorists who follow the hunt, he muses: "It seemed impossible that so many grown-up people should be intent on seeing a little animal hounded to death," going on to question what Foxy (or, by extension, any small creature) had done to deserve such a cruel fate. When David sees the fox killed, the narrator tells us that it is a sight he will remember all his life, and his question - "Why did they seek to kill and destroy when there was really no need - why did it ever have to happen?" - is one that will stick with the reader.
A powerful exploration of the connections, both positive and negative, between humanity and the creatures of the wild, Foxy also offers an interesting depiction of English Catholics in mid-twentieth-century Britain. I can't think of very many British children's books which feature British Catholic characters (rather than foreign ones), although there is the Merrick family, in Antonia Forest's series of novels about the Marlows, published from 1948 through 1982. Howsoever that may be, I thought that here too, Montgomery offered a sensitive exploration of larger issues, as David learns the story of St. Francis from Father Crispin, and then applies it to his own situation. There is clearly a spiritual component to David's story, evident not just in the way that his adoption of Foxy mimics the tale of St. Francis and the Wolf, but also in the episode in which he encounters the hungry stranger in the wood. There are many hints that this tall man in the grey overcoat is meant to be the escaped convict known to be loose in the area, but then he is also later connected to St. Francis himself, who appears to David in a (possible?) vision. Outsiders - the orphaned David, the abandoned Foxy, the escaped convict - are linked together in this story, and then connected to a revered saint, giving the reader much to ponder.
Despite its strengths, Foxy was not an entirely unproblematic book for me. As mentioned, I didn't always agree with some of the ethical reasoning put forward by the characters. I was also unconvinced that taking Foxy and taming him was the correct course of action, and was struck by the easy acceptance of this decision, within the narrative, given that other issues (such as hunting) were so passionately discussed. The idea that being tame is better for an animal than being wild is too easily accepted. That said, this was still an immensely entertaining and poignant read, one I would recommend to anyone with an interest in foxes in children's fiction, the depiction of English Catholics, or just engaging orphan-finds-a-home tales.
Originally published in 1959, and then reprinted in this paperback edition in 1971, Foxy is a moving tale of a boy and his beloved fox companion. Immediately involving, it manages to convey the depth of David's feelings - riding on the train toward his new life with the Hedgers, praying to St. Francis for a dog, watching Foxy flee before the hounds - without ever veering into sentimentality. There is a lot to ponder in the story, which explores the relationship between humans and animals, and the ethical issues involved in hunting, while also obliquely examining the role of religion in a young person's life. The author takes a clear stand against sport hunting in the book, as evidenced by David's discussion of the issue, first with the stranger in the Wood, who describes fox hunting as "a cruel business," and then with Mr. Hedger, who considers it a holdover from 'primitive' times, before humans developed an affinity for animals, and were able to reason properly. While I find the latter argument rather unconvincing as an explanation for the persistence of sport hunting - I would think that ancient peoples had a greater affinity for animals than their modern counterparts, perhaps because they needed to hunt them more often - I was in sympathy with the feelings so evidently influencing it. Perhaps the most powerful condemnation of the practice of fox hunting comes at the end of the book, as David - and through him, the reader - must watch a beloved friend being hunted and (ostensibly) killed. Witnessing the many motorists who follow the hunt, he muses: "It seemed impossible that so many grown-up people should be intent on seeing a little animal hounded to death," going on to question what Foxy (or, by extension, any small creature) had done to deserve such a cruel fate. When David sees the fox killed, the narrator tells us that it is a sight he will remember all his life, and his question - "Why did they seek to kill and destroy when there was really no need - why did it ever have to happen?" - is one that will stick with the reader.
A powerful exploration of the connections, both positive and negative, between humanity and the creatures of the wild, Foxy also offers an interesting depiction of English Catholics in mid-twentieth-century Britain. I can't think of very many British children's books which feature British Catholic characters (rather than foreign ones), although there is the Merrick family, in Antonia Forest's series of novels about the Marlows, published from 1948 through 1982. Howsoever that may be, I thought that here too, Montgomery offered a sensitive exploration of larger issues, as David learns the story of St. Francis from Father Crispin, and then applies it to his own situation. There is clearly a spiritual component to David's story, evident not just in the way that his adoption of Foxy mimics the tale of St. Francis and the Wolf, but also in the episode in which he encounters the hungry stranger in the wood. There are many hints that this tall man in the grey overcoat is meant to be the escaped convict known to be loose in the area, but then he is also later connected to St. Francis himself, who appears to David in a (possible?) vision. Outsiders - the orphaned David, the abandoned Foxy, the escaped convict - are linked together in this story, and then connected to a revered saint, giving the reader much to ponder.
Despite its strengths, Foxy was not an entirely unproblematic book for me. As mentioned, I didn't always agree with some of the ethical reasoning put forward by the characters. I was also unconvinced that taking Foxy and taming him was the correct course of action, and was struck by the easy acceptance of this decision, within the narrative, given that other issues (such as hunting) were so passionately discussed. The idea that being tame is better for an animal than being wild is too easily accepted. That said, this was still an immensely entertaining and poignant read, one I would recommend to anyone with an interest in foxes in children's fiction, the depiction of English Catholics, or just engaging orphan-finds-a-home tales.
August 8, 2025
Quite a few spoilers ahead!
Some positive things I have to say about this book are that the writing style and story felt very captivating despite being a middle grade novel and it was lovely to see so much criticism of fox hunting and animal cruelty in general, which was not a totally shared sentiment at the time, and still isn’t today to a lesser extent. However, I’m not sure if the concept of “taming” a wild fox cub, everyone being completely fine with it and it all working out in the end is the best or most realistic message? Of course, it’s only a work of fiction, but children WILL extrapolate this to their own problems and desires, similarly to how David initially wanted to have a pet to be like everyone else and not feel so lonely in his new neighbourhood. Even ignoring the infamous “taming wild animal” trope, I loathe books that imply having a pet will solve all of your problems just like that, as well as religion of course. While this was written in a far less secular time and the story about Saint Francis may initially seem sweet, what happens when a child reader prays, like our protagonist, to Saint Francis extremely hard only for their pet (for example) to never appear, run away or die regardless? The priest tells David to be “less selfish” with his wishes and prayers, but even by the end of the book the boy wants Foxy to survive for himself and for the happiness Foxy provides HIM, so I don’t understand where the potential lesson to kids is there, either? Also, what was up with that escaped convict? I get that, from David’s perspective, he was always helpful and kind, but if we’re being for real his behaviour and scenes in which he appears are so creepy to me. I mean, if ANYONE (criminal or not) tells you not to mention them to your parents or any other adult and literally BREAKS INTO YOUR HOUSE, just maybee something is up.
Anyways, I probably took this children’s book was too seriously haha, but that’s just how I am. The reason I even read this was to help pick favourite fox-related books for an OC of mine (who was hyperfixated on foxes particularly as a child) lmao.
Some positive things I have to say about this book are that the writing style and story felt very captivating despite being a middle grade novel and it was lovely to see so much criticism of fox hunting and animal cruelty in general, which was not a totally shared sentiment at the time, and still isn’t today to a lesser extent. However, I’m not sure if the concept of “taming” a wild fox cub, everyone being completely fine with it and it all working out in the end is the best or most realistic message? Of course, it’s only a work of fiction, but children WILL extrapolate this to their own problems and desires, similarly to how David initially wanted to have a pet to be like everyone else and not feel so lonely in his new neighbourhood. Even ignoring the infamous “taming wild animal” trope, I loathe books that imply having a pet will solve all of your problems just like that, as well as religion of course. While this was written in a far less secular time and the story about Saint Francis may initially seem sweet, what happens when a child reader prays, like our protagonist, to Saint Francis extremely hard only for their pet (for example) to never appear, run away or die regardless? The priest tells David to be “less selfish” with his wishes and prayers, but even by the end of the book the boy wants Foxy to survive for himself and for the happiness Foxy provides HIM, so I don’t understand where the potential lesson to kids is there, either? Also, what was up with that escaped convict? I get that, from David’s perspective, he was always helpful and kind, but if we’re being for real his behaviour and scenes in which he appears are so creepy to me. I mean, if ANYONE (criminal or not) tells you not to mention them to your parents or any other adult and literally BREAKS INTO YOUR HOUSE, just maybee something is up.
Anyways, I probably took this children’s book was too seriously haha, but that’s just how I am. The reason I even read this was to help pick favourite fox-related books for an OC of mine (who was hyperfixated on foxes particularly as a child) lmao.
Displaying 1 - 2 of 2 reviews