John Dvorak has been one of my favorite science writers since I came across The Last Volcano while visiting Kilauea, and I assume that the relative scarcity of reviews on his books is due to a lack of marketing, because I think he is easily the equal of many more popular authors. I was excited from the minute I saw the title of this book, months before publication. It wasn’t always exactly what I expected, but I wasn’t disappointed.
Like the other Dvorak books I’ve read, this one combined detailed “look-at-the-physical-properties-of-this-rock” geology with great layman’s explanations of complex physics, humanizing anecdotes of key scientific figures through the centuries, and a sense of wonder at how the forces of the earth interact with human history and our place in this small moment in geologic time. In some ways it reminded me of McPhee—I recently read his Assembling California, and I actually found How The Mountains Grew to be more educational and accessible while having a similar aspect of hands-on exploration.
I’ve read quite a few books on popular geology, astrophysics, dinosaur extinction, and evolutionary biology, but Dvorak managed to cover a lot of ground here that was completely new to me. I especially liked the focus on mountain building that went beyond just the subduction of one tectonic plate beneath another, which seems to be where most books end. The up-to-date information on the revelations of tomography around the Farallon Plate were fascinating and that chapter, by itself, was worth reading the whole book.
I look forward to rereading this as a reference while traveling to various national parks in the future. Virtually every area of the US is covered somewhere in this book, and I won’t look at any place I visit without wondering if I should relate its features to volcanic eruption, magma extrusion, uplift or tilting or thinning due to delamination, glacial moraines, floods from glacial lakes breaking dams….and so many other factors I now understand in much greater detail.
I would technically rate this as 4.5 stars rounded up, knocking a bit off for the terrible editing others have pointed out (it didn’t really hinder my reading, but was sad in such a high-quality book), as well as some of the evolutionary biology content. Maybe I felt too strongly about it because I recently finished Dawkins’s Ancestor’s Tale, but I thought many of his sections around evolutionary biology, including punctuationism vs Darwinism and information around Hox genes, drew questionable conclusions that are not nearly so universally accepted in that space as he makes it sound.
I look forward to the next one.