Oh boy, I have so much to say about this one that I had to actually turn on the computer to write it out. Anyway here we go.
I got this book back last August from Book of the Month's YA subscription box. I was drawn in by the premise, a girl caught between two worlds-- One cultural and one religious. Sounds great.
Soon after getting it, I tried reading it immediately. But I soon fell into a depression and reading slump and had a hard time picking up books during that time. So I set the book aside.
Fast forward to January 2020, I am participating in the Get Shit Done Readathon and one of the prompts was to read a book that you had put down. So I immediately thought to grab this, seeing as it was my only BOTM left over from 2019. Read it in January and start over fresh with just 2020 BOTMs moving forward.
Now that we're done with the backstory, let's move into the actual review.
This book is about Navaeh Levitz, a 15 year old girl whom is half black on her mother's side and half Jewish on her father's side. Again, the premise about a girl be caught between these two different worlds drew me in.
And while that is part of the plot, it gets weighed down by a lot of problems the book had in my opinion. The part involving Navaeh exploring both her Jewish faith and Jamaican culture were interesting. I enjoyed her talks with Rabbi Sarah. As someone whom is neither Jewish nor black, I cannot speak on either representation in the story. And seeing as the author herself is black and Jewish, I can imagine that she knows what she is talking about.
No, my problem comes from the characters. Which were more or less reduced to stereotypes without much nuance to them.
Let's start with her cousins.
Jerry, is coded in descriptors that reek of fatphobia. He barrels into the room at one point. He grew horizontal instead of vertical. He's always hungry. The amount of food he can eat is joked about constantly.
Jordan and Janae are basically the same person but one of them is nice to Navaeh and the other is not. Jordan is an activist and also exists as an antagonist to Navaeh on her mom's side of the story. I suppose she's supposed to balance out Abby, the mean girl but she doesn't because Abby never gets a side to her mean-ness.
Since, I've already mention Abby, let's talk about her. Abby is the Mean Girl of the story which is trope I'm pretty sure we should've done away with already. There's a stark difference between a bully, which exist in the real world and mean girls which exist only in Hollywood teen movies. Abby was raised by an alcoholic mother whom stays in her unhappy marriage because money and a rich, racist man whom funds the school so his daughter can do whatever she wants. OF COURSE. I half expected the story to give Abby a small redemption at the end. Abby is secretly gay, or is seeing someone of another race... Maybe even made it that she had a thing for Navaeh's best friend. Stevie whom is half Asian. I mean, if we were getting the Mean Girl trope, can we at least get the Mean Girl is actually misunderstood trope as well. Nope. The book ends with Abby being mean, staying mean and never atoning for being mean. But her dad gets yelled at for being racist and isn't allowed to sue the main character because reasons.
Moving on, we have Stevie, Navaeh's obligatory only friend. He is half Asian, father doesn't care about him, mother is dead and wants to go to a dance academy. I expected him to be the gay best friend but it turns out he was straight and has a thing for Jordan, the mean cousin. Jordan ignores him/is straight up disgusted by him for 90% of the book but then he gives her friends attention instead of her in one of the last chapters and all of sudden she looks mad. There's multiple points in the story where Navaeh is conflicted between being a good friend to Stevie and being mad that he wants to leave her behind for his dance program. This results in her being a shitty friend whom ditches him, is never there for him, tries to lie about being there and ignores him. But the times that she does put their friendship first like on New Year's Eve instead of going to a party with Jesus and her cousins, Stevie gets mad at her for not telling him about the party. All because he has a thing for Jordan and doesn't want to be a virgin forever. By the end of the book they both apologize for being shitty friends but I could've cared less.
Next is Jesus, the love interest. The moment we first meet him which is like chapter three, he asks if he can kiss her which he does. We are also introduced to him by Janae whom mentions that Jordan has a thing for him all summer. That right there should've maybe given Navaeh the hint to not encourage his attention. I'd make comment on the fact that he calls her "Lightskin" for almost the entire book until she randomly snaps at him to stop and he does. It's never brought up again after that but I don't fell comfortable discussing that part, seeing as I am white and do not face colorism or other racist issues. Eventually Jesus and Navaeh just begin dating despite having no chemistry. This lack of chemistry is brought up later when Jesus finds out that Navaeh yelled about her dad being dead. He rants to her about not getting to know him and making everything about herself or some bullshit but the narrative up until that point had nothing to do with Jesus and Navaeh getting to know each other. It was just him showing up in random places and inviting her to parties. The story can't put his lack of development on the main character and make it a conflict when there is nothing to support that.
And lastly we have her parents, Corinne and Samuel.
The plot centers around their separation which has left Corinne depressed and bedridden, which is a trope I've seen too many times. Can we stop the narrative that when a man leaves a woman, a woman falls apart? Especially if that woman has a child to take care. The separation was caused by the fact that Corinne caught Samuel cheating on her with his secretary (we'll get to her in a minute). Her dad happens to also be a big shot lawyer with lots of money and has always been a shitty person. We find out through Corinne's journal (an unforeseen mechanic thrown into the story but was not mentioned in the synopsis) that Samuel cheated on them before but was able to manipulate her into getting back at him. Now, there is nothing wrong with one of the parents being shitty but in a story about a girl whom is supposed to be torn between two worlds... Making one of the sides shitty doesn't make that side of the plot make sense. So when she begins enjoying her time with Rabbi Sarah, and learning Hebrew and even mentions that she was looking forward to having a Bat Mitzvah, it seems strange because the person making her do those things is her father but the entire plot is shown making him a villain, he is the main antagonist. He ruined her mother, he ruined her life and he's selfish. So why does it matter that he wants her to have a Bat Mitzvah, unless it was supposed to be weaponized against her mother, if that was the case, it could've been done differently.
And that is speaking as a child of divorce. Parents are master of manipulating their child and turning them against the other parent. And I mean, the fact that the dad couldn't properly manipulate Navaeh as well as the reader contradicts that fact that he's suppose to be some really great lawyer. Lawyers are master of manipulating and lying but he doesn't do that.
Which circles back around the why the plot suffered. Because the premise was not expanded upon. Instead we had all these smaller subplots with her friend, and love interest and poetry and her cousins.
But before we got into what I think would've made the plot good, first we need to briefly discuss the most cartoonish of the "antagonists", Ashleigh. The 27 year old, blonde secretary that Navaeh's father cheats on her mother with. She's racist, kind of ditzy, follows weird food diets and uses her body to get things her way. Every scene where the woman spoke, I found myself rolling my eyes and being yanked out of the story because the book must've been fucking joking. She was not the smallest bit convincing when it came to being a antagonist. And also, why did she need to be? And eventually I fall down the rabbit hole of questions of why the father had to cheat? People break up for other reasons. But it had to be the most dramatic and stereotypical reason.
So back to the plot, the plot suffers because most of characters are not believable as people. But the plot also suffers because it doesn't focus on Navaeh's relationship towards her parents and thus these two halves of herself. Her father being painted as the Bad Guy makes the Jewish storyline disingenuous. Why should Navaeh care about her father wanting her to have a Bat Mitzvah if he's just a horrible person? And more importantly, why should the reader care? Her mother is bedridden for most of the book, depressed over her husband cheating. Which to an extent is believable but makes Navaeh connecting with her culture and race and mother's family seem more like her mother just threw her to wolves. Her mother is not present in the story which is why the plot NEEDED the journal entries from when she was in college, so we had some idea about who this woman was supposed to be and thus feel sorry for her. But I didn't because she wasn't being a good mother to her daughter.
I wish the story had centered around her parents breaking up, not because someone cheated but because they fell out of love. So Navaeh with her mother to live with her maternal side whom she has had almost no contact with over her entire life. Her mother now without her husband and the defining role of being his wife has to find herself over again and in the process has to reconnect with her daughter whom has had her whole life uprooted. But then she has to see father whom suddenly wants her to have a Bat Mitzvah because she never got to have one. Make it where the dad suppressed his religion because of the mom, and the mom repressed her culture because of the dad. And now that they are separated, they want to share both with their daughter but in the process it is pulling her in two directions. Or at least, that's how I would've done it. But alas I did not.
And now that I have gotten all of my actual complaints out, it's time for bonus nitpick round:
- There were 8 (I counted) Harry Potter references, in a story that had nothing to do with Harry Potter. There was no correlation between Navaeh's problem and the characters in Harry Potter. Or even a memory attached to the books. They were just referenced and it was supposed to come off as cute and quirky parts of personality.
- The poems were sometimes being written, and sometimes she was just thinking them. Which kept taking me out of the story. Because reading a poem versus normal prose is starkly different tone.
- I've already mentioned that journal entries were only there to give her mother some personality because the plot called for her to not be there. But the journals were also sporadic. They didn't get whole chapters dedicated to them, they were just thrown in. And they were conveniently all about how her mother was sexually assaulted as a teenager and how that lack of trust led her to become easily manipulated by the Bad Guy that is Navaeh's father.
- One of the non-Harry Potter references she makes is a Beauty and the Beast reference. She mentions that her school library reminds her of the "magical book room" that the Beast gives to Belle. I'm sorry... Did we watch the same movie? What magical book room? Do you... do you mean, a LIBRARY?! The Beast gave Belle a library because he learned that she loved to read. It was the turning point of the story, the first selfless act the Beast does. The room wasn't magical, it was a library.
Anyway, the end this lengthy rant and go read something more enjoyable, I really had hoped to like this book but it just wasn't for me. The characters brought the story down which inevitably effected the plot.
EDIT:
Decided to bump this up to three stars because I felt bad for judging it so harshly as a debut. I stand by my gripes with it but I know a first novel is never perfect.
Three stars.