Just finished Dear Shareholder. Overall, I’d say it’s a mixed experience — parts of it were fantastic, but others felt shallow. The concept of the book is great: curating excerpts from top shareholder letters to show how great executives think about capital allocation, culture, and long-term value creation. But it’s uneven.
The Goizueta, Bezos, and Google sections were disappointingly short — barely scratched the surface of their thinking. The chapters on Indra Nooyi and Ginni Rometty also leaned too heavily into ESG and corporate-speak, the kind of surface-level PR that feels disconnected from true capital stewardship.
That said, there were a few standouts that made the book worthwhile.
Morningstar really impressed me — their clarity about their moat, pricing power, and competitive position was refreshing. They describe their business in the same language a long-term investor would use: network effects, brand trust, and subscription stickiness as compounding advantages. It’s Buffett-like in tone — rational, simple, and self-aware.
Leucadia and Seacor were also excellent. Both reflected a disciplined, contrarian approach to capital allocation — high returns on incremental capital, patience in dislocated markets, and total comfort with being out of step with the crowd. They care more about intrinsic value math than market popularity.
Cimpress stood out for a different reason. I liked seeing the evolution of their letters over multiple chapters — watching a company go from a small print-on-demand business to a genuine capital allocation machine. It’s rare to see that kind of longitudinal record of growth and self-reflection. Cimpress treats capital allocation as the core craft of management.
The epilogue tied everything together nicely. It describes what separates first-rate managers from the rest: patience, modesty, clarity, and a deep understanding of capital allocation, buybacks, acquisitions, and people. These companies are “wonderful” not because they’re flashy, but because their leaders compound value through intelligent restraint and long-term thinking.
“Wonderful companies run by first-rate managers have modesty, openness, and command in communication — with a clear understanding of capital allocation, buybacks, acquisitions, and management of people.”
Some sections I photographed are worth keeping close:
1992 – Investing
• Emphasizes reinvesting cash flow into high-return opportunities.
• Looks for businesses with low capital intensity, pricing power, and distinctive quality.
• Strong reminder that saying no matters as much as saying yes.
“Knowing when to say ‘no’ is just as important as knowing when to say ‘yes.’”
2000 – Tumult
Written during the dot-com bubble — still feels timeless. It warns against financial euphoria and reminds investors that economic gravity always reasserts itself.
“Economics has its own gravitation-like forces that work over time and can only be ignored at investors’ peril.”
There’s also a nice reflection on productivity — that America’s true strength is self-renewal, not blaming others (in that case, Japan). And a nod to how innovation, like the early internet, was reshaping everything — but still subject to valuation discipline.
The epilogue ends with a line I really liked:
“Some books are to be skimmed, others read quickly, and a few endlessly examined. This one falls into the last category.”
That’s true — but only for the best parts. I’d put Dear Shareholder in the “selectively examined” category. When it hits, it really hits — especially the letters that combine clear thinking with humility and discipline. The rest serves as a reminder of how easily shareholder communication drifts into noise when management loses focus on capital allocation and true compounding.
Main takeaway: The best letters — Morningstar, Leucadia, Seacor, Cimpress — show that clarity, candor, and discipline are timeless. The others prove how rare those qualities actually are.