I was pleasantly surprised by this book. I’m more of a fictional-novel-style fan, so this isn’t one that I would have picked for myself, if it weren’t chosen by my book club. The author has clearly done his research and goes through the gamut citing various historical instances supporting his arguments. I learned quite a bit.
That being said, my issue is more with the MANY things that should have been caught in editing, regarding clarity and fact-checking, for instance:
-The author references ‘slaves imported from India during British rule’ (p.149). They were not slaves, they were indentured contract workers. Although indenture system has been compared to slavery, they were free (upon completion of their contract, usually 7 years) and compensated.
-The author cites people of ‘Guyanan’ heritage (p.5). I presume he means people from the country of Guyana? Which would be people of ‘Guyanese’ heritage.
-In the chapter on sexual stereotypes, he says, ‘this has led to men going to extreme lengths to try to increase the size of their penis. Indian mystics known as Sadhus have been known to stretch their penis from an early age by hanging weights on it…’ (p.61). This is very misleading. Yes, Naga Sadhus do hang weights on their penis (which may have the unintended effect of elongating the penis, I guess?), but this is done as part of their strict spiritual ascetic conditioning. This is not done with the intent to lengthen and increase the size of the penis, nor to make them more desirable for sexual practice, as the context of the paragraph and chapter suggests.
-This book is also HEAVILY skewed in focusing on the US historical impact on racist stereotypes – sometimes to its detriment, in my opinion. For instance, when discussing perceptions regarding food, he focuses on how food stereotypes were perpetuated in the US, while citing a host of ‘Afro Caribbean dishes’ (p.72). Despite referencing these dishes, he does not talk much about them. I felt he missed the opportunity to discuss how the Afro presence in the Caribbean has shaped the foodscape of the region. And how these foods promote ideas of national and regional inclusion (i.e. ox tail is not just seen as an Afro Caribbean dish, but a Caribbean dish), which could have been used by the author as a counter-narrative to the negative stereotypes perpetuated in the US.
Like I said, I very much enjoyed the book. However, I suggest if you are interested in a particular point the author makes, do some independent research to get the entire story.
Because I have personal knowledge of the above points, it does make me wonder what else could/should have been clarified in the book, and raises the question why it wasn't?
-Someone of ‘Guyanan’ indentured Caribbean heritage