Please note: Potential Spoilers!
I really, really wanted to enjoy this book. I enjoy supporting local authors and want to promote the array of talent the Commonwealth of Kentucky has to offer. BUT...as someone who was born and raised in Eastern KY, over a decade earlier than the author, I doubt some of the details of the story. I recognize her disclaimer that "that's how she remembers it," but it just doesn't ring true. Her parents lived in Berea, which is a mere 30 minutes (max) by Interstate 75 from Lexington (large city, home of UK, next county over from the state capital, you get the picture). Also noteworthy is the proximity to Richmond, which is mere minutes from Berea. Her upbringing doesn't seem to be as underprivileged as reported. I am from a small town that required two hours and two lane roads until the last 20 miles to get to Lexington, until about 10 years ago when they widened part of the road to four lanes. But the last 30 minutes travel back home is still two lanes. I'm making this comparison because the author tends to play on stereotypical sympathies of "just a poor KY girl who pulled herself up and made it in the big world of Ivy League schools."
She visited her family in the poorer county frequently, and clearly spent time there as a child. However, the true "Hill Women" part of the story lies with her mother and grandmother's story. If she had gone into greater depth of their struggles and why they chose their paths, it would have been a more enjoyable read. But honestly, talking about "granny frolics" as a commonality seemed disingenuous, simply because I'm older than she and had to go back an extra generation to my great -grandmother's notebooks to find mentions of women gathering at homes for childbirth. That said, even my Great-grandmother, a poor country girl, gave birth to my grandfather in 1936 in the little hospital in our county. The events and timeline seem incongruent with her age.
The author also gives little credit to her parents, who clearly worked VERY hard to provide for her, as she went off to her various schools. She actually attended school with a credit card from her parents in hand (for emergencies, such as a Burberry scarf), and goes into detail about how she felt peer pressure to buy high dollar fashion to fit in. But, bless her little heart, she bought some of it from Ebay and discount sites! She seems pleased that she came home all dressed up and felt like the odd one out at a family holiday. Yet she takes zero responsibility for the rift between her and her beloved cousin, who didn't have the same opportunities. Every person I know who has "left the holler" is acutely aware that clothes, mannerisms, speech, etc. will be dissected and discussed among relatives when they return for a visit. Yet, she seems confused that she felt overdressed in her expensive cashmere. But it was cute! It was trendy!
I could go on, but it will only sound harsh. I share the opinion of other reviewers that she expounds on the evils of the justice system a bit much, and she definitely derides our current POTUS while promoting and drooling over the Democratic Party. I, like others, suspect she has political ambitions. I finished the book, even though I wanted to stop, simply so I could leave a thorough review.
I found the short snippets about her mother interesting, that lady was the true success story and would have redeemed the novel. I feel that her mother truly worked for her education and had a great story to tell, but it's just skimmed over.
Honestly, the book is tone deaf to the amazing stories of survival she could've used from Hill women in Kentucky who thrived and didn't let life beat them down in the midst of economic poverty. It's tone deaf to the women who actually did pull theirselves out of squalor and went off to college on scholarship with $50 in their pocket and a suitcase full of ramen noodles. My opinion is just that, after all I'm just a poor Appalachian girl who went to a state school.