What do you think?
Rate this book
The Upright Ape: A New Origin of the Species
Drawing on such diverse antecedents as history, myth, and religion, as well as modern developments in biology and genetics, the author bravely questions and rejects the reigning scientific orthodoxy and shows how humans and apes may have had a common upright ancestoran upright ape that walked on two legs much as we do now.
- GenresAnthropologyScience
288 pages, Hardcover
First published July 1, 2007
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews
October 3, 2018
This book is very technically challenging. Is is dense , deep and rather academic. Unfortunately I found page 123 so riddled with errors, not of science but of grammar and syntax, as to ruin the overall flow of this book. Although it is thorough and very scientific I would not recommend this book for the average reader. It is a very technical book. Dr. Filler makes an excellent technical theory. However in reality it is written in such a manner that the average reader would find it impenetrable.
November 17, 2018
I picked up this book with great interest. I remember, twenty years ago, reading “The Naked Ape” by Desmond Morris and “The Territorial Imperative” by Konrad Lorenx. Both books were well written and made a profound impact on my view of human nature. Will “The Upright Ape” make a similar impact?
The author, Dr. Aaron G. Filler certainly has the qualifications to write on this subject. He is highly qualified in both anthropology and in medicine, earning his MA in anthropology in 1979, his MD degree in 1986 and also his PhD in 1986. Besides his training in anthropology and evolutionary theory, he is also a world famous neurosurgeon for his skill treating spinal disorders. As an expert in both fields, he has much insight into what kind of spinal structure is needed to support upright verses horizontal posture. Through the years, he has advised some of his fellow anthropologists by examining their fossil finds and their professional papers.
The stimulus for his book and his choice of title “The Upright Ape” began in 1981 when a fellow anthropologist placed in his hands a seemingly inexplicable twenty-one-million-year-old fossil. “The bone had the totally unique features found in humans, but it was from a creature that lived fifteen million years too soon.” After studying this fossil, Filler believed that it can be explained, but Darwin’s Theory, as it presently stood, could not explain it. Filler realized that a broader, more general theory of evolution would be required, one that incorporates the phenomenal growth of scientific knowledge gained over the past twenty-five years.
The fossil given him had its origin in a volcanic region along the Uganda-Kenya border that was studded with numerous twenty-two-million-year-old mammalian fossils from the Miocene era. The most surprising fossil was a nearly complete mid lumbar vertebra that was assigned to the species Proconsul Major. I think this is the fossil Filler examined in 1981. Based on his expertise in medicine as well as anthropology, especially his skill in spinal disorders, Filler claims this fossil is the defining proof of a revolutionary new idea. It is proof that the common ancestor of humans and apes probably already had an upright stance, bipedal locomotion, and did not require the use of arms and hands for locomotion.
Filler felt that this was an entirely new genus among the hominoids—basically, an entirely new kind of animal. It was a primate that not only stood erect, but could not walk comfortably in a horizontal position as modern apes do. This revolutionary discovery is the core of Filler’s book. Modern apes evolving from an upright ancestor is not the general consensus of Darwinian Theory, so, based on many new discoveries, Filler felt some updating of the theory is warranted. Sections of his book trace the development of scientific understanding of how new species of animals have changed through time, starting before Darwin’s General Theory of Evolution and continuing to the present. I didn’t know the German poet Goethe was one of the pioneers in this field. Filler provides an interesting history of how the Theory of Evolution was developed and why it is widely accepted by scientists today. He tried not to get too technical. “I propose to make my case by proceeding simultaneously in both the formal academic arena and in the broader sphere of access provided by a book written for the general public.” He succeeds to some extent, but the book is still pretty technical.
Anthropologists who study Australopithecus and Homo are convinced that upright bipedalism must have arisen from a quadruple common ancestor with a chimpanzee. However, there is no definitive fossil evidence at all for this position. All the evidence, which Filler reviews in detail in his book, actually points the other way when it is fully and fairly considered. There are presently four great hominoids on our planet: Orangutan, Chimpanzee, Gorilla, and humans. Only humans have an upright posture. Filler argues that both Sahelanthropus and Orrorin fit the description of being human; both may be reasonable candidates for ancestry of the chimpanzee lineage as well. He goes on to say that if this evidence for an upright bipedal, hominiform lineage is accepted, then either of the two above species can be seen as a human ancestor for the chimpanzee, which would turn Darwin’s theory upside down.
I think Dr. Filler has marred what might have been a very good book on science by crossing over into religion and theology and trying to refute the beliefs of Christianity. He is not an expert in these fields. I think he should have let his sound scientific findings stand on their own merits and state his thoughts about religion in a separate book. In spite of that, however, if you are interested in cutting edge discoveries in anthropology and in a proposed updating of the theory of evolution that accounts for new discoveries, you will find this book very interesting.
The author, Dr. Aaron G. Filler certainly has the qualifications to write on this subject. He is highly qualified in both anthropology and in medicine, earning his MA in anthropology in 1979, his MD degree in 1986 and also his PhD in 1986. Besides his training in anthropology and evolutionary theory, he is also a world famous neurosurgeon for his skill treating spinal disorders. As an expert in both fields, he has much insight into what kind of spinal structure is needed to support upright verses horizontal posture. Through the years, he has advised some of his fellow anthropologists by examining their fossil finds and their professional papers.
The stimulus for his book and his choice of title “The Upright Ape” began in 1981 when a fellow anthropologist placed in his hands a seemingly inexplicable twenty-one-million-year-old fossil. “The bone had the totally unique features found in humans, but it was from a creature that lived fifteen million years too soon.” After studying this fossil, Filler believed that it can be explained, but Darwin’s Theory, as it presently stood, could not explain it. Filler realized that a broader, more general theory of evolution would be required, one that incorporates the phenomenal growth of scientific knowledge gained over the past twenty-five years.
The fossil given him had its origin in a volcanic region along the Uganda-Kenya border that was studded with numerous twenty-two-million-year-old mammalian fossils from the Miocene era. The most surprising fossil was a nearly complete mid lumbar vertebra that was assigned to the species Proconsul Major. I think this is the fossil Filler examined in 1981. Based on his expertise in medicine as well as anthropology, especially his skill in spinal disorders, Filler claims this fossil is the defining proof of a revolutionary new idea. It is proof that the common ancestor of humans and apes probably already had an upright stance, bipedal locomotion, and did not require the use of arms and hands for locomotion.
Filler felt that this was an entirely new genus among the hominoids—basically, an entirely new kind of animal. It was a primate that not only stood erect, but could not walk comfortably in a horizontal position as modern apes do. This revolutionary discovery is the core of Filler’s book. Modern apes evolving from an upright ancestor is not the general consensus of Darwinian Theory, so, based on many new discoveries, Filler felt some updating of the theory is warranted. Sections of his book trace the development of scientific understanding of how new species of animals have changed through time, starting before Darwin’s General Theory of Evolution and continuing to the present. I didn’t know the German poet Goethe was one of the pioneers in this field. Filler provides an interesting history of how the Theory of Evolution was developed and why it is widely accepted by scientists today. He tried not to get too technical. “I propose to make my case by proceeding simultaneously in both the formal academic arena and in the broader sphere of access provided by a book written for the general public.” He succeeds to some extent, but the book is still pretty technical.
Anthropologists who study Australopithecus and Homo are convinced that upright bipedalism must have arisen from a quadruple common ancestor with a chimpanzee. However, there is no definitive fossil evidence at all for this position. All the evidence, which Filler reviews in detail in his book, actually points the other way when it is fully and fairly considered. There are presently four great hominoids on our planet: Orangutan, Chimpanzee, Gorilla, and humans. Only humans have an upright posture. Filler argues that both Sahelanthropus and Orrorin fit the description of being human; both may be reasonable candidates for ancestry of the chimpanzee lineage as well. He goes on to say that if this evidence for an upright bipedal, hominiform lineage is accepted, then either of the two above species can be seen as a human ancestor for the chimpanzee, which would turn Darwin’s theory upside down.
I think Dr. Filler has marred what might have been a very good book on science by crossing over into religion and theology and trying to refute the beliefs of Christianity. He is not an expert in these fields. I think he should have let his sound scientific findings stand on their own merits and state his thoughts about religion in a separate book. In spite of that, however, if you are interested in cutting edge discoveries in anthropology and in a proposed updating of the theory of evolution that accounts for new discoveries, you will find this book very interesting.
May 1, 2014
Brilliant. But I think the explanation of the origin of species, as in the title was rather all-encompassing for the topic Filler has tackled. However, his proposal of major re-structuring of genomes in the evolutionary past, is a hugely important part of this whole complex story and he certainly addresses the main title of his book: the Upright Ape part with well-researched studies & demonstrates really good evidence for the lumber (spin) restructuring in upright apes and convincingly makes an argument for this feature to have arisen as far back as 22 million years ago. Now read that date again and now compare that to our supposed split from chimps (and all that LUCY - Australopithecus dodgy looking fossils for proper bipedalism) around 6/7 million years ago.
This book is very much worth a read and gives much food for thought. It is easy to read as well and very well laid out. The up right ape tells a very important piece of the evolutionary puzzle, which incidentally has never been answered by Darwinian explanations. This brings me to the fact that I don't believe that Filler actually goes far enough in his scientific criticism of the theory of evolution by Darwinian means. But, that may be my own personal bias now having investigated this topic at great length.
If you are interested in broader issues surrounding Darwinian evolution and solutions, as Filler has given for at least part of this great puzzle: visit: http:diggingupthefuture.com
This book is very much worth a read and gives much food for thought. It is easy to read as well and very well laid out. The up right ape tells a very important piece of the evolutionary puzzle, which incidentally has never been answered by Darwinian explanations. This brings me to the fact that I don't believe that Filler actually goes far enough in his scientific criticism of the theory of evolution by Darwinian means. But, that may be my own personal bias now having investigated this topic at great length.
If you are interested in broader issues surrounding Darwinian evolution and solutions, as Filler has given for at least part of this great puzzle: visit: http:diggingupthefuture.com
December 28, 2011
I adore the fuck out of books which have the potential to turn a field on its head, in this case Human Evolution. First off Filler lays out the genetic framework for large scale evolutionary shifts in animals (Vertebrates as "inverted" insects? Oh, hell yeah, baby! That's fun stuff) and offers a solid primer on chromosomal evolution & developmental genetics.
Fillers contention that upright locomotion developed in apes at least as far back as 21 million years seems to have put a real hair across the asses of paleoanthropologists all over the place e
Jackass on a Camel: Fossils, Freaks & Mayhem in the Cradle of Mankind
Follow @JackCamel
Fillers contention that upright locomotion developed in apes at least as far back as 21 million years seems to have put a real hair across the asses of paleoanthropologists all over the place e
Jackass on a Camel: Fossils, Freaks & Mayhem in the Cradle of Mankind
Follow @JackCamel
Displaying 1 - 4 of 4 reviews