I don’t want to sound unkind, but this is honestly one of the worst books I've ever read. I got it for free from Amazon, and I still feel short changed.
The sad thing is, I think buried in it somewhere, there are some decent ideas and strategies. However it is deeply and fundamentally flawed.
Where to start...
It reads like it was translated from another language, or was written by someone in their second language. Perhaps that is the case but it makes it a bit of a chore to read.
For example:
“Whatever someone fears is real to them and should be looked at with appreciation and never forced to overcome.”
You can understand it, but it is peculiar.
Along the same lines, in places it reads like a parody of self help books, which I'm assuming isn’t intentional? Self help by Alan Partridge?
“Rather than being fearful of your mistakes, try making mistakes on purpose, just to see what happens.”
Or self help by David Brent:
“A problem features goals and barriers. We have goals we want to reach, and then there are these hills or mountains, called barriers, that stand in our way to reach these goals. Problem solving is about overcoming these barriers so that we can reach our final destination: Our goals.”
Or self help by Troy McClure:
"it's your choice to wake up and be positive, and it really is that easy.”
GET CONFIDENT STUPID!
Confusingly, although it is supposedly a book about overthinking and how to avoid it,there are significant sections on worrying (fair enough), negative thoughts (related perhaps), insomnia and procrastination. Any of those are worth a book on their own, and trying to shoehorn it all into this one dilutes the overall message. If you want to write a book on dysfunctional thought patterns, then write that book, don’t cram everything you know into this one.
For a book about overthinking it is also quite concerning the amount of times the advice involves “pick it apart".
The book is also not above making completely false or unsubstantiated statements like:
“That restless leg syndrome is because your legs need to be stretched out and massaged.”
Restless leg syndrome is a medical condition, so I think it’s quite inappropriate to be chucking blasé stuff like that out.
Perhaps this is referenced somewhere, but it’s nigh on impossible to tell as the way the book is referenced is essentially just a great long list.
There is also just a lot of nonsense statements that are either cliché:
“the more decisions you have, the more likely it will become a bigger piece of a pie you can’t chew.”
Or just half thought through waffle:
“Bananas hold a ton of nutrients that will bring your sugar levels back to normal as well. Sometimes you may just be having a sugar attack from high or low sugar intake, so a banana will bring these levels back to normal, which will make you feel calmer.”
In the section on procrastination, reason starts to break down entirely. When describing tasks that aren’t urgent or important the author uses these:
“Anyway, they are activities like watching TV, surfing the Internet, playing games, and much more.”
Those aren’t tasks at all, they are leisure activities. You might as well say “completing your paid work is more urgent than going for a swim". True, and entirely unhelpful.
In the same section the author also describes procrastination as “lazy" which runs contrary to both the research on it and how most people experience it. It is also quite unhelpful if a person is trying to overcome that tendency.
You also find yourself questioning whether he knows what an emergency is:
“Or you can easily put off emergencies that you believe are not important, and those emergencies might actually turn into severe situations.”
If it isn’t important, or severe and can be easily put off, is it an emergency? Probably not. There is quite a bit in this section where the author seems to believe that procrastination involves not dealing with emergencies. I wouldn’t say this is a commonly used definition. People don’t typically procrastinate when they find their house is on fire, or when they lop off a finger.
Also from that section (which I'm starting to think might have been written during a lunch hour)
“An athlete will delay medications because they are so concerned about the current game.”
Sigh. Again, not procrastination! The athlete is putting something off, yes, but for a defined and potentially legitimate reason.
In all, this just feel careless, ill researched and poorly written. What useful tips it does contain can, I'm sure,be found elsewhere, without all the chaff.