The unprecedented political power of the Ottoman imperial harem in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries is widely viewed as illegitimate and corrupting. This book examines the sources of royal women's power and assesses the reactions of contemporaries, which ranged from loyal devotion to armed opposition. By examining political action in the context of household networks, Leslie Peirce demonstrates that female power was a logical, indeed an intended, consequence of political structures. Royal women were custodians of sovereign power, training their sons in its use and exercising it directly as regents when necessary. Furthermore, they played central roles in the public culture of sovereignty--royal ceremonial, monumental building, and patronage of artistic production. The Imperial Harem argues that the exercise of political power was tied to definitions of sexuality. Within the dynasty, the hierarchy of female power, like the hierarchy of male power, reflected the broader society's control for social control of the sexually active.
Leslie P. Peirce is an American professor in history. Her research interests include early modern history of the Ottoman Empire, gender, law, and society. She received her B.A. in History from Harvard College, her M.A. in Middle Eastern Studies from Harvard University, and her Ph.D. (1988) in Near Eastern Studies from Princeton University. In 1988–1998 she was with the Cornell University. In 1998–2006 she was professor in the Departments of History and Near Eastern Studies the University of California, Berkeley. Since 2006 she is with Department of History and the Department of Middle Eastern and Islamic Studies of the New York University, where she is the Silver Professor of History.
Peirce shows impressive familiarity with the practical evolution of the Ottoman court, and the interactions of its male and female players through political events spanning about 150 years. It's a meticulously researched human interest story, based on detailed analysis of financial records and archival notes, which documents the important roles of court women in daily administration of the empire, the palace, and the ruling family network. Where Westerners have commonly presumed that the “harem” of the ruling house was a site of decadent pleasure, Peirce shows its full complexity as an administrative center, somewhat like an early-modern Buckingham Palace with all its royals, officials, and managerial staff.
سلطنت زنان که به نام سلطنت حرمسرا هم معروفه، یه بازه زمانی در تاریخ امپراطوری عثمانی بود که در اون زنان، بخصوص زنان حرمسرای شاهی، قدرت سیاسی و نفوذ زیادی در دربار و تصمیم گیری های امپراطوری داشتن. این دوره، از زمان سلطنت سلطان سلیمانی قانونی تو قرن شانزده میلادی شروع میشه و تقریباً صد و پنجاه سال ادامه پیدا میکنه و با مرگ مادر سلطان محمد چهارم و افزایش نفوذ وزیران، مخالفت علمای مذهبی و قدرت گرفتن سپاهیان (ینیچری ها) به پایان میرسه. قدرت زنان این دوره فرای تصوره برای دوران خودش. از نفوذ گسترده روی سلاطین و عزل و نصب وزرا گرفته تا افرادی که سفرای خارجی برای گرفتن امتیازهای مختلف پیششون میرفتن و تبادل نامه و هدایا با شاهان و ملکه های کشورهای دور و نزدیک (سافیه سلطان و ملکه الیزابت اول یا کوصم سلطان با خواهر شاه عباس اول). سلطنت زنان یه معجزه و یا یه پدیده خارقالعاده محدود به امپراطوری عثمانی نبود (نمونه های شبیه بهش رو میشه تو مصر باستان، امپراطوری چین و یا حتی اروپای قرون وسطی پیدا کرد) بلکه محصول شرایط اجتماعی و سیاسی زمانه خودش محسوب میشه و به تبع با تغییر شرایط، این دوره تاریخی هم دچار افول شد و از بین رفت. کتاب به خوبی و با جزییات کامل به بررسی دلایل ظهور و زوال سلطنت زنان میپردازه. یه نکتهای که خیلی تو این کتاب دوست داشتم ارائه پیش زمینه و بسترهای تاریخی و دینی بود. اینکه چطوری فرهنگ ترکی-مغولی آسیای میانه روی روابط بین مردها و زن های خاندان پادشاهی تاثیر میذاره و یا اینکه در تاریخ اسلام، سابقه حضور و نفوذ زن هایی مثل عایشه، زبیده (زن هارون الرشید) و ترکان خاتون (یکی از زن های ملکشاه و دشمن نظام الملک) به تصویر زن در دید علما و فقها شکل داده بود. اما کتاب کاملا آکادمیک نوشته شده و اگه بدون آشنایی قبلی با این بازه زمانی سراغش برید خیلی زود بین اسامی پرشمار و کلمات سختش گم میشید.
Although a chronologically confusing read for those who don't have a background in the Ottoman Empire, but it successfully challenges western views of gender roles and power of the Harem.
I became interested in learning more about the Ottoman Empire, the Sultans and the institution of the Imperial Harem after watching 'The Magnificent Century'. The series revolves around the reign of Sultan Süleyman 'the Magnificent', his relationship with his favoured Haseki Hürrem Sultan and the triumphs and disasters of the Ottoman Empire during the era of the 16th century.
Needless to say I was intrigued and decided to peruse the history section of my university library in search of books on the Ottoman Empire and specifically on the harem. Despite being a history student, I have never studied the Ottoman Empire in detail as my focus up till now has been on Europe, America and the modern world. So I went into this book with very little background information on the Ottomans or their modes of government and authority. I wouldn't recommend this as the Imperial Harem, although incredibly detailed, is highly academic and requires some previous knowledge in order to fully grasp its key themes.
Nonetheless, I can safely say that I enjoyed this book, despite my being woefully under prepared for it. The Imperial Harem is rigorously researched, insightful and brimming with historical detail and analysis. The main arguments of the book are that the royal women of the Harem played critical and influential roles within the politics and government of the Ottoman Empire, that the Sultan relied heavily on his female relatives and concubines for alliances, advice and for the production of royal heirs and that the nature of Ottoman sovereignty changed dramatically throughout the history of the Empire.
To say that this is a heavy going book is an understatement. It is clearly meant for an academic audience and the author often delves into intense analysis which may leave the general reader a little lost. Informative and dense, this book requires patience and a willingness to understand the various theories being proposed. However, it is still a fascinating and well-written read for those prepared.
The Imperial Harem is focused into two components.
Section 1: The Politics of Reproduction. This sections provide a broad overview of the Ottoman Empire from the reign of Osman I (1281-1324) to the reign of the child Sultan Mehmed IV (1648-1687) and details how and why the Sultans preferred serial concubinage in the production of royal heirs then to them marrying into other royal houses. The influence and prestige of the various Hasekis and Valide Sultan in the post-Süleymanic period is noted and deftly explained from the reign of Hürrem Sultan, favoured concubine then wife to Süleyman to the Turhan Sultan, Haseki to Ibrahim I and mother to Mehemed IV. This is a brilliantly researched and thoughtful piece; relentless in destroying the damaging Western obsession with the harem as a place of sexual intrigue and lust. Pierce puts the Harem in context and explains it workings as an institution and why it was the locus for power in the Ottoman world. In the intro, she smoothly sorts out the myths of the Harem and places the institution into its proper standing in historiography.
Section 2:Women and Sovereign Power This section concerns the authority and political aptitude wielded by influential members of the harem particularly the Valide Sultan and the Grand Vizier. Pierce discusses the transformative images of Ottoman Sovereignty as the Empire ceased to expand and instead focused its energy and resources on maintaining its vast territories. The various public charities, good deeds, public processions, the building of grand mosques and tombs were celebrated displays of royal power and privilege; meant to broadcast who was in charge and to bolster popular support. Pierce argues that the diplomacy carried out by the Valide Sultans and the Sultans favoured concubines ensured more successful international relations. How the women exercised such broad power and how society viewed it is another key component of the Pierce's thesis. This section leans to more the theoretical than the previous one and is good deal more analytical and thoughtful. It is highly interesting and will question the readers attitude towards the harem.
All in all, this was an excellent, well-rounded and academically brilliant book into the real historical value and influence of the royal Harem. Might be a much for the general reader to follow.
An excellent work on the Ottoman harem, bringing the institution into the center of discussions on Ottoman sovereignty. Even after more than 25 years, this book is still the best on the topic and one of the best books in Ottoman historiography.
After examining the roles of earlier members of the harem (both concubines and mothers), Peirce directly connects their fortunes to the changing systems of the Empire. This was mostly not the general environment changing the institution of the harem; but the other way around. Individual favorites and royal mothers with their decisions affected the course of how the Ottoman dynasty functioned.
Peirce made the compelling argument that it was the royal mothers who ensured that the violent change of sultans did not break down the entire system. So, while the legitimacy of the individual sultan could be challenged and erased the legitimacy of the dynasty as a whole remained intact. This is so much similar to the argument Kantorowicz made in "The King's Two Bodies" for the English crown. In a way, royal mothers were playing the role of guarantee for the legal body of Ottoman crown/dynasty.
Still, the book might be overwhelming for people unfamiliar with Ottoman history as it necessarily uses a lot of unfamiliar names and titles. That the book covers more than three centuries might also be too much for the unfamiliar. If you wonder about how Ottoman power functioned and what harem was all about though, this is a must-read!
I recommend this for anyone who wants to know more about arguably the most tumultuous era for the Ottoman dynasty's harem through a sociopolitical lens that takes into account axes other than simply gender. Caveat: Not for strictly chronological historical account. This book is more about how certain governmental bodies and traditions evolved according to the demands and circumstances of their time; not about giving a year by year guide for people who are unfamiliar with Ottoman history. You can still read it without knowing much about Ottoman history, but it would be very challenging to follow.
A re-envisioning of the role of women at the Ottoman courts of the 16th and 17th centuries. Pretty good stuff: details the politicizing of reproduction, concubines, and the political responsibilities of moms, slave women, and the ways in which male dynasts were moving in the same arenas of "seclusion". It's not really seclusion, though. Fully illustrated but not in the way you might want.
This is a topic that won't interest most people I think, but I have to say this was a fascinating read, it helped make sense of a lot of information that's usually thrown around in documentaries or tv shows. I would reccomend this to anyone interested in the Ottoman Empire or any fan of Turkish history.
Fascinating and filled with rich historical detail into the secret lives of the most powerful women in the Ottoman Empire! Highly recommend to anyone interested in Women's History!
Dense, but fascinating. Peirce argues that the women of the royal Ottoman court, from the 1600s through the late 1700s, exercised a great degree of legitimate political power, both behind-the-scenes and during public rituals, although Peirce says we shouldn't think of the Ottomans with a simple public/private dichotomy. The favorite concubines and, above all, the mother of the sultan exercised a huge degree of autonomy. The royal harem was not the prison Western Christians imagined, but lively places filled with religion, children, and political intrigue. The women were the glue of the imperial government, providing continuity. They were closest to the sultan, so they, like the male grand vizier, had the most influence.
Have always been fascinated about this particular subject but could find no revelent books written about it! Finally one has been! No heresasy or guesswork but simple facts written with care & great knowledge of the subject! A good book all-round only wish there were more written!
I'm only halfway kidding when I say I would force others to read this book if I could. Not only is it easy to read, it's filled with a lot of great source material and explores women's lives in the Ottoman Empire/Imperial Harem, looking at the personal and political roles they played behind the scenes.
I find this book important, not only as a study which serves well in shattering persisting western myths, but also as a starting point for research in entirely new field of study with respect to political involvement of the Ottoman women.
Utterly fascinating! I loved learning about the structure of early Ottoman Society and the lives of these incredible women. A must read for fans of the Sultanate of Women.
A well researched and interesting history of the role of women in the reigning House of Osman in the Ottoman Empire with a focus on "The Sultanate of Women" during the sixteenth and early seventeenth centuries. I was especially fascinated by how Ottoman royal women played key diplomatic roles, corresponding with Queen Elizabeth I of England and Catherine de Medicis Regent of France. There were also interesting chapters about how Ottoman royal women, especially mothers of sultans, gathered information about wider political events from the comparative seclusion of palace harems. The marriages of royal princesses to grand vizirs were especially important to this process and behind most successful sultans were a network of female relatives. I look forward to reading Pierce's biography of Suleiman the Magnificent's consort Roxelana.
Meant for somebody with a better base in Ottoman history, so I lost a lot because I had trouble keeping track of people and events. But still interesting, especially since it's clear she's extrapolating from some extremely dry sources like expense accounts. It was at times a bit dry and finishing it felt like a bit of a chore. Might reread if I cover more Ottoman history. Clears away a lot of the stereotype of the harem and has a lot of fascinating tidbits about how royal marriages worked--like how marrying the sultan would actually lower the status of a free Muslim woman.
This is much more of a textbook than a historical novel, but if you're passionate about learning this will read well for you. Thoroughly well researched and remarkably sensitive to the needs of the layman, Peirce's work is easy to follow and provides a good look into the workings of one of the most fascinating times in Eastern history.
Chill read, lays out the info in a very straightforward way. Kinda wish it went more in-depth on the day-to-day life of living in a harem which I picked the book up for, but for the tidbits it shared, it made it worth reading.
3.5 yıldız... Osmanlı'nın özellikle 15. ve 16. yüzyıllarının saray hayatı ve yönetiminde kadınların rolüne dair derli toplu bir çalışma olmuş. Özellikle "gaza" ideolojisinin bitimi, bürokratik devlet algısının yükselişi ve hükümdarlık aura sı gibi Osmanlı klasik döneminin belli başlı gelişmeleri ile "hasekilik" ya da "valide sultanlık" mefhumlarının ilişkisine dair kayda değer gözlemler var. Lakin böyle detaylı ve doyurucu bir çalışmanın kadın çalışmaları (hatta feminist) kuramıyla hiç ilgilenmemesi kitabı biraz yavan kalıyor. ayrıca kitapda şeyhzade mehmet'in kösem'in oğlu olmadığının iddia edilmesi gibi küçük bilgi hataları, yahut Kanuni'nin şeyhzade Bayezid'e yazdığı, aslı günümüz Türkçe'sine yakın olan ünlü mektubunun çeviride saçma sapan bir anahaber Türkçe'sine çevirilmesi gibi lokal çeviri katliamları var.