⭐️⭐️🌗
Note: I received an eARC for the purpose of giving my honest review.
Book TW: massive racism based graphic violence, white supremacists, assault, war
Okay... so thoughts on this one are complicated. This was informed out of the author’s ancestry (she was adopted from birth in England and found out as an adult that she was biracial and her father was an American GI who died at Normandy) and so I want to acknowledge and honor her crafting a story that is obviously so meaningful to her. However, I think the execution of this book left a lot to be desired and I was so disappointed that I did not really like it. Going into this I was so excited to see a historical fiction with an interracial romance and while I was perfectly aware that the book was going to cover racism, but I just think again that the execution left a lot to be desired and was written in a way that I think would be extraordinarily triggering to a lot of people. By far the biggest issue for me was how Romare’s arc was handled. The beginning third of the book spends so long on Frankie’s childhood that we don’t even get to meet her love interest until 40% into the book and then Romare is only directly in 20% of the story. More time is given to the perspective of some side characters than is given to Romare and it made him feel more like a prop for Frankie’s character development than a fully fleshed out character of his own. Then there’s /the scene/ which I won’t go into specifics on here but holy crap it was triggering and I just... when it comes to certain events I think it’s important to sometimes air on the side of indirectly showing or discussing things that are triggering, or at the very least giving a trigger warning of some sort at the beginning of the book. While we can acknowledge what happened in the past and how horrific these things were (and still are today) it’s a really delicate line between being honest to the events and being too graphic and inadvertently risking harm to people’s mental health who read the work. I’ve read a lot of books that have hard to handle topic matter in them, especially over the past couple years, but this is the first one I can think of that I believe crossed that line from good commentary on hard things into just hard and triggering beyond what it needed to be.
Interestingly, I think the book actually did a pretty decent job at portraying PTSD and how it was handled for soldiers in WWII and even though the portrayal of tragic events like Dunkirk were still somewhat graphic, it stayed on the line of honest, but probably not as likely to be harmful to reader’s mental health.
I think a lot of my struggle with this just came down to issues with the writing. I could see the good intentions and the intense amount of research and the personal passion that went into the story, but I just don’t think the writing helped it along. I think it was trying to weave in too many plot threads and characters and mysteries all together and between that and literally spanning almost four decades, the story was stretched too thin to effectively handle it. Some characters ended up being more stereotyped and archetypes because they simply did not get enough page time to be much else and having almost every bad thing being connected to one of two factors made this aspect amplified.
If the book had been clipped to start when Frankie met Romare and really hone in on their perspectives and relationship, I think a lot of my problems with the book would have been evaded. But because it didn’t, the moments that the author chose to slow down and hone in on held a lot more weight and in the one case it did not pay off. The last part of the book (after I took a mental break and came to terms with what I’d read) was a little better and I did actually like the overarching structure of Frankie’s third act development.
Some of this could certainly be that I simply don’t gel with the author’s writing style (I /know/ that’s the case for the multi and seemingly random POV switches per chapter, once it was in the middle of a paragraph... that was a nOPE for me). A caveat here, if see a black reviewer who covers it, I would prioritise their perceptions of how the book handled the racism over mine. My view is coming more from a mental health/trigger lens as opposed to personal experience with the topic matter as I am white and so my ability to speak on the topic is inherently limited.
But still, for me overall and in my view, this was just an unfortunate example of good concept with not as good execution and I feel super bad that I feel that way, but it overall just was not a good experience for me and I don’t think I can recommend that you read it. To me, even though it does have some good and well-portrayed aspects, the bad to me is it weighs the good.