David Leigh Shambaugh is an American political scientist, Sinologist and policy advisor. He currently serves as the Gaston Sigur Professor of Asian Studies, Political Science, and International Affairs at George Washington University, where he is also the director of the China Policy Program at GW’s Elliott School of International Affairs. He is also a Distinguished Visiting Fellow at the Hoover Institution (2024—). He was previously a non-resident Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution. Shambaugh served in the Department of State, and on the White House National Security Council staff during the presidency of Jimmy Carter. As an author, Shambaugh has authored 12 and edited 21 books, and over 200 scholarly articles and newspaper op-eds. (Source: Wikipedia)
A single-author study on the region of southeast Asia by an eminent scholar of Chinese politics. Four chapters of the seven in the book are devoted to American and Chinese "encounters" in southeast Asia; starting with the broad historical view and continuing to the present era of "great power competition".
Easily, the strongest chapters of the book are those which focus on the near past and the present. The author's access to elite opinions (academics, higher-ranking ministers, and even some heads of state) and his ability to elicit serious answers and doubts from personal interviews form an intriguing gauge of perspectives in what they believe, or what they would signal to others that they believe.
Shambaugh does not exclusively concentrate on military influence or territorial disputes; those commercial links and personal exchanges that are so often the bedrock for further negotiations are closer ties are also investigated. For example, thousands of Thai military officers have been trained in the United States -- or also, many more thousands of students in the region are educated in Chinese universities, not solely in the United States. Even so, there is an astonishing shortfall of expertise about Southeast Asia itself, including in China.
What he finds is a pervasive ambiguity, where countries would at present see themselves caught between two powers, and are at times distrustful of their intentions, and yet want to keep their options open in the case of further maneuvers. There are very few cases of governments that have wholly thrown their lot in with one great power or the other. Of the countries surveyed, Singapore has the closest relationship with the United States, whereas the state that could be most seriously considered a client state of China is Cambodia. And where there is suspicion of China's naked ambitions, the United States, the last four years have done little to shake the perception of relative decline, framed by incoherent commitments from the outgoing Trump administration.
One hopes that the history of the region in the 21st century will not be as violent as the 20th. Even so, this is a valuable guide for following what turbulence may arise in the coming years.
David Shambaugh is one of the top China scholars in the world and it is always a pleasure to read one of his books. In this, his most recent book, he details the history and current influence of the United States and China in Southeast Asia and Southeast Asia's navigating between the two great powers. Especially helpful was chapter 6, which goes into country-by-country detail on the ten ASEAN countries' relationships to China vis-à-vis the United States.
Shambaugh concludes that China is doing better than the United States from the strategic point of view, making significant inroads and pulling most Southeast Asian countries closer to itself than to the United States. However, the United States still has deep roots and more comprehensive power than does China - with particular advantages in its military and soft power. The U.S. also has significantly more direct investment in Southeast Asia than does China. Shambaugh calls for the U.S. to fully recognize Southeast Asia as a strategic foreign policy priority - and calls for the U.S. to engage in stronger public diplomacy efforts to, in part, educate Southeast Asians about what the United States contributes (China's information/public diplomacy/propaganda campaigns have been significantly more effective than the U.S., which engages too little in this kind of work, as Robert Gates also noted in his recent book). Finally, Shambaugh calls for the U.S. to navigate carefully and to engage Southeast Asia but to not alienate Southeast Asia by asking countries to choose between the U.S. and China - the best that can be hoped for is a more neutral hedging and partial strategic alignment with the United States.
It will be interesting to watch what efforts the incoming Biden administration will make in Southeast Asia. Hopefully there will be a push to re-engage Southeast Asia under a revitalized "pivot." In any case, the regional competition with China will be a significant foreign policy challenge for years and decades to come.
Shambaugh's latest study of Southeast Asia between the US and China is a fascinating survey of historical and contemporary relations between the region and the superpowers. As a senior China scholar, Shambaugh has nearly unrivaled access to top policymakers and international experts. As a result, the book is loaded with helpful empirical data and penetrating insights into the strategic triangle. At times, though, his judgment (he deems Cambodia and Laos merely client states of China at this point) verges on simplistic and precludes the potential for more nuanced analysis. Still, on the whole, the work was outstanding and offered a rich look at the great debate of the state of Southeast Asia's relations with China and the United States at a pivotal and complex historical moment.
An interesting and timely book delving into the relationships of ASEAN countries with both China and the United States. Timely, because the Asia Pivot strategy of the Obama era and the China Trade War from the Trump era both seem part of Biden’s strategy and book’s timeline runs up to the 2020 US Presidential elections.
The book has four parts and seven chapters but I think you can break it into two sections plus a summary.
First section, in Parts 1 & 2, reviews the historical relationship between both the US and China with each of the ASEAN countries. First the US, then China, looking at the history and contemporary situation. Shambaugh looks at several facets: economics (commerce), security, and public/social diplomacy. I liked the historical review as I wasn’t particularly familiar with the detail provided. The contemporary era covers the Obama and Trump years so the book is exceedingly current.
The second section looks at each of the ASEAN countries and assesses their view of both the US and China. You can read this section in any order as the countries are, roughly, covered west to east (except it starts with Thailand then Myanmar). I felt this section didn’t go into enough depth of the commercial ties between SE Asian countries and China.
I liked the approach taken by Sebastian Strangio in In the Dragon's Shadow: Southeast Asia in the Chinese Century for the assessment of China’s current involvement with each of the SE Asian countries and how geography shapes their concern. Mainland countries see cross border trade and investment, new high-speed rail lines, and the damming of rivers while maritime countries biggest issue being China’s claims to islands in the South China Sea (China's 9 Dash Line .
What Shambaugh provides is how the US and China interact with the ASEAN countries and how those countries balance (or not) their relationships with the US and China. Combined, the two books provide a comprehensive picture of the region. This one, the history and dynamics of the relationships with a good summary on future scenarios of the interplay between SE Asia, China, and the US. Where In the Dragon’s Shadow excels is the depth of economic activity between the reviewed countries and China.
This is a good book about the state of Southeast Asian relations with the US and China, though with a clear bias towards presenting the American side of things. I wouldn’t say it’s written for the general public, it feels more directed towards American politicians and those who influence policy making in order to educate them, and more so argue that more efforts need to be done to court back Southeast Asia in America’s favor.
I’ve read several books on this topic already so I didn’t learn anything too new, but my biggest takeaway from this was learning about how deeply America is entrenched in the military and security apparatuses of nearly every Southeast Asian nation, even though it’s often not highly publicized (as in the case of Malaysia, for example). Their continuous military support for each country seems to be their strongest influence in the region (along with the export of their cultural products) but the book argues to expand this further into other spheres as well as a bulwark against rapidly increasing Chinese expansionism in the area (particularly economically).
It’s worth reading if one wants to understand the situation from a well-versed American policy perspective. I don’t necessarily agree with it, but that’s irrelevant to whether or not I think it’s a good addition to the existing literature on the topic. Solid read.
This work is an important survey of Southeast Asia, a key region in its own right, but one of critical importance in the context of great power competition unfolding in the 21st century. Dr. Shambaugh brings decades of experience as a renown China scholar, provding real insights into the challenging balancing act the nations of Southeast Asia find themselves in while he makes clear he sees China making headway economically and diplomatically. He concludes that the U.S. maintains an important advantage in the military sphere, especially in the security cooperation it carriers out with ASEAN states. Crucially, this book was published in 2020 and only captures the initial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. In the book he cites the Institute for Southeast Asian Studies (ISEAS) State of Southeast Asia report and it is interesting to consider the 2021 results where respondents when called upon to make make a binary choice between the U.S. and China chose the U.S. (61.5%) compared to China (38.5%), a substantial increase in selecting the U.S. compared to 2020. It looks to be a comprehensive competition that shows no signs of abating and Southeast Asia looks to be a prominent location for this competition that will shape the 21st Century.
8/10 This is less a story of America v China. And more telling the story of SE Asian nations, their rise, interactions with America and China, and current stance towards each. The author correctly points out that almost all SE Asian nations are straddling the line (hedging their bets) between both great powers.
What the author doesn't really dive into much, which I wish he would have, is how the US can shape it's foreign policy to have greater influence in the region. He makes a few vague statements, but more concrete discussions about how the US can bridge the tyranny of distance and be seen as a loyal/constant economic and military ally would have been welcome
I enjoyed the entire book, but the best, most enlightening section for me was the author’s accounting of ASEAN states’ perspective of the US and China. To me, it is worth reading even just that section as not many books address this perspective.
Great primer for both the experienced and casually informed on the increasingly complex and unique relationship of each SEA country with the United States and China. While I appreciate the heavy use of quotes from policymakers, strategists, and other brilliant minds in the region to convey current attitudes toward these relationships, I find the book lacking in original narrative, laced with broad generalizations, and highly repetitive.
Initially selected as this was on the Secretary of the US Air Force's recommended reading list given rising tension with China. As one who currently lives in the Pacific, an informative read (possibly too highly-academic for me being a novice learner) on the State of the States of Southeast Asia, a place that sounds like it could be (or is?) the front of a sort of cold war (or more of increasing competition). Recommended for those with an interest in the region and how current politics stand.
A strong case for the strategic importance of Southeast Asian countries to both the US and China. Shambaugh lays out the history of US presence, perception, and influence in the region. While he finds US perception has suffered from neglect by the Trump Administration, amid deepening investment and engagement from China, the US still holds substantial strengths and opportunities in the area.
I listened to this on audio book as a recommendation on understanding current the geopolitical climate with China. The book is easy to follow, very straight forward, and has a logical approach to understanding U.S., China, and ASEAN relationships, investments, and priorities. However, it is very, very dry and not a particularly exciting read (though I don’t think it’s supposed to be).
"Most international issues have no solutions, but they can be managed," says Bilahari Kausikan, the former Permanent Secretary for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Singapore.
...from Chance of Taiwan, China Reunification is ‘Nil’ – What Happens Next?
A great primer on the regional geopolitics, but quite distracting that the preface is basically a preemptive apology by the author in case anything is wrong.