这个世界会好吗？：梁漱溟晚年口述

by Shu Ming Liang, Guy S. Alitto, 梁漱溟

本书是美国芝加哥大学教授艾恺在写作《最后的儒家——梁漱溟与中国现代化的两难》一书后，为印证事实，于1980年8月来华专访梁漱溟先生的访谈记录。谈话中，梁漱溟论述了儒家、佛家、道家的文化特点及代表人物，也谈及与诸多政治文化名人，包括李大钊、陈独秀、毛泽东、周恩来、蒋介石、康有为、章太炎、胡适、冯友兰等的交往经历，并回顾了他一生的重要活动——任教北大、从事乡建运动、创建民主同盟等。书中内容丰富，可作为了解与研究梁漱溟思想与活动及近代中国社会生活的重要参考。

Genres: China, Philosophy, Nonfiction

338 pages, Paperback

First published March 2, 2013

Reviews

[Kaidi Pan · Rating 4 out of 5]

A very smooth read. But one can literally see the gloomy sociopolitical atmosphere in the background.

[Patrick · Rating 2 out of 5]

A revealing series of conversations that did more to help me understand the political context of China between 1912 and the Cultural Revolution than "Neo-Confucianism" as a philosophy, which was more my interest coming into the book. It might have been helped if Alitto was a better interviewer, but unfortunately I found him fairly pedantic and unwilling to pursue the really interesting questions throughout. Still, there are great tidbits throughout, including anecdotes about some of the biggest names in 20th century China (Liang Qichao, Zhou Enlai, and Mao himself all feature), and the few sections where Liang goes into real detail about his personal philosophy are always compelling. I did come away from this thinking that Liang was a genuinely great man, if not quite the standout figure that Alitto clearly thinks of him as being. On the other hand, Alitto accidentally gave us a good read on the challenge of a historian approaching the real individual behind their study.

[Yijun · Rating 5 out of 5]

Chinese confucianism thinks the most important is human, we think human can change many things, as a human, we may make mistakes, so the most important is to behave well and correct the mistakes.

Indian Buddhism denys the life.Life is a circle and it will be end. The life is like the illusion, it is dated back to the acient time, and it could be again popular in the future time.

[Junyi Yang · Rating 3 out of 5]

民国的人与事总是让人读来有种豁达感。题目有点标题党。

[Ray Mo]

很黑色的是，书名为其父投河自尽前三天问儿子的话。提出了全球学者的内心疑问。知道了康有为抢经书，占画不还的黑历史，还有金岳霖是大学不敢轻易染指挂科的形式逻辑作者，幽默怼胡适的段子。阅读顺序应该是先看具体作品，这个对话集作为补充拾遗材料。虽说穷则思变，82岁老女人当政委炮灰的时代，能有多少人性。

[bⒶrtleby · Rating 3 out of 5]

因江老师的推荐而读的。感觉槽点很多，提问者的脑袋也很浆糊。梁的乐观部分来源于对未来的误判，如今已经把后四十年纳入视域的我们，恐怕很难从中获得慰藉