This novel is 13th-century Scottish history as seen through the eyes of the young man who sought to guide the child king Alexander III to maturity and to keep his throne.
Nigel Tranter OBE was a Scottish historian and writer. He was the author of a wide range of books on Scottish castles, particularly on themes of architecture and history. He also specialised in deeply researched historical novels that cover centuries of Scottish history.
An interesting story of how David Lindsey of Luffness, minor laird, became the companion to child-king Alexander III, King of Scots, and sought to look after his monarchs best interests. This is part of the Cospatrick series as David is related to the Cospatrick Earls of Dunbar. He introduces Alexander III to goose hunting and the king spends quite a bit of time down by Aberlady Bay with David's family. There is woman that watches after the king who is reputedly his half-sister Margaret, however the only illegitimate daughter that I've been able to find is married to Alan Durward, Earl of Atholl, who is plotting to legitimize her as Alexander's heir. That doesn't go over well. In this book the plot is outed just after Alexander's marriage to Margaret Plantagenet, Henry III of England's daughter and he's in Scotland when their first child is born. In True Thomas also by Tranter, Alexander is in England for the birth of his first child and later the Durward outing takes place when Alexander achieves his majority. Some consistancy problems but still a good book
Having read Enovy Extraordinary previous to reading Crusader,it's basically the same story just told from a different point of view. With the main character(Cospatrick & David de Linday) in each story being the hero to save King Alex from captivity.. both good stories in their own versions.
I was disappoined with this. I expected far more about the education of Alexander 111 from David his mentor, upon whom this novels centres. It was interesting in that it was very factual-whether geographically/politically/historically, etc. But the entire novel read like a litany and list of events and happenings. A touch of humour was also attempted (and failed miserbly)-with the apparent obsession of the king for goose hunting.This was overpalyed time and again, and really lent nothing to the narrative.
There was very little action, a weak plot, which was held together chronologically alone. Hugely disappointed all round-Tranter normally writes much better than this. I simply couldn't wait to get to the end of it.