As a big fan of Dimaro’s previous work (Humane Sacrifice, Viral Lives, and A Fire on Memory Lane, to name a few), I was excited to dive into this collection, which promises to explore the thin line between humanity and monstrosity. I was especially curious to see how he would define a “monster,” what psychological torment these characters would endure, and how I as a reader, would be asked to engage with them.
The collection opens with “The Loveliest Shade of Red,” which immediately sparked intense discussion in my book club, including one member choosing to DNF. The portrayal of Raveena was difficult for many of us, particularly because of how her arc intersects with abortion, guilt, and punishment. While the author has clarified that anti-abortion messaging was not his intention, intent doesn’t always soften impact. For me, as a woman, the framing was difficult to read without feeling echoes of moral judgement. It made for passionate conversation, but also an uneasy reading experience.
Overall, the collection had moments that worked and moments that didn’t for me. The two stories I connected with most were Casper: a devastating exploration of bullying, invisibility, and marital rape, and Daily Special, which I had previously read as a standalone novella. Raveena actually reappears in Daily Special, and reading it again with her full backstory in mind shifted my experience in an unexpected way. While I still enjoyed the story, I found myself wishing I didn’t have that context attached to her character.
Many of the stories center on morally complex characters who make deeply flawed choices. I understand that we are not meant to like these characters, but rather to confront them. But I still found it difficult to emotionally invest in most of them (with the exception of Casper). Spending extended time in the heads of certain characters felt more exhausting than insightful. I did notice a recurring pattern in how many of the female characters were often portrayed through a sexualized lens, whether as deviant, unfaithful, objectified, or subjected to graphic sexual violence. Whether intentional or not, the repetition of this framing became distracting and, at times, off-putting. Some stories, like “Choke Me Hard,” felt overly long and repetitive, which lessened their impact.
The final story was the most challenging for me. It contains extremely graphic depictions of rape and animal death (please check content warnings). While I understand that horror often pushes boundaries, the level of detail felt overwhelming for me and lingered longer than I personally needed to understand the horror of the situation. However, I did find the ending intriguing, it almost felt like a different story entirely, and I’m pretty sure it is laying groundwork for future stories.
Ultimately, I can’t easily recommend this collection as a whole, though I would still suggest Daily Special and Casper as standalone pieces. If you’re new to Dimaro, I wouldn’t start here. His writing is bold, confrontational, and intentionally disturbing, but this particular collection may be polarizing, especially for readers sensitive to graphic sexual violence or certain portrayals of women. As always, your mileage may vary, but proceed with awareness of the content.