Plain and simple : it’s woke. Don’t need this book. Just read “Harry Potter A Journey Through A History of Magic”. The book this book was based on.
How do you ask it is woke ? The book has no author credited to it, just a publication. Suspicious though not woke. The wokeness appears when the book tried to argue two different ideas and how they are related, tries to show snip bits of history to defend the idea but actually does the opposite, and then continues to talk about its woke idea as if it didn’t just dismantle their own idea one paragraph previously.
Example : talking about a male dominated society (during witch trials) where women, the mentally ill and disabled were weak targets depicted as old ugly women with brooms and were disenfranchised. Ok first of all, not even all men were able to vote. So men were also “disenfranchised”. Only men who owned property/land could vote. Second, an old ugly lady in european and american folklore isn’t because women are weak. It’s to show aging, knowledge gained, beauty and youth versus wise and smart, among other things.
Next ,
“But the attitude in history towards witchcraft has been overwhelmingly negative, and often used as a means of persecuting women in society.”
Then it talks about Edward Fairfax in 1621 and how his youngest of three daughters died, and the two older daughters blamed a random woman in their town of doing witchcraft that lead to their youngest sisters’ death.
“The women accused by Fairfax were tried twice, but, despite his best efforts, they were acquitted each time. His daughters eventually admitted that they had invented their dreams in which the witches were performing dangerous acts and trying to kill Anne. It was possibly no surprise that, in this male-dominated society, they had done so to get the attention of their father.”
1. Yes. Many women died. But “society at large” didn’t do it because they hated women. If women were actually hated, families wouldn’t keep their daughters, inheritance wouldn’t pass to daughters AT ALL in any form. So no, people didn’t hate women just because.
2. If this publication had any brain cells and knowledge over actual history, they (cuz we don’t know who wrote it) would know that any social contagion or phenomena that spreads quickly as a means to give explanation for the inexplicable, has almost always started with girls and women. Why? Because women care about what others think of them, they care about belonging socially in a group, they care about looking good towards others (even if that isn’t true). Women are social. Sometimes it’s to please others. During the witch trials it was often a girl or a woman who accused another woman or girl. Other reasons as to accuse someone of witchcraft during the witch trials was because someone was in the way. In the way of you getting money , status , prestige , land , etc. Remember, there weren’t many people back in that time and most often the people residing in these towns and cities were related to one another in some way, whether an inlaw or cousin, or teacher who saw you grow up etc. Everyone knew everyone. The easiest way to get what you want, is to eliminate the person in your way.
The book eve says the daughters lied because they wanted to please their father. It’s not because of a “male-dominated society” bullcrap. It’s because they are children. They love their father. What son or daughter , be it 5 or 18 or 24 years old, doesn’t want to please their parents and get their approval? It’s because of love. “I close my case”. XD
This is what I mean by already having an idea or conclusion and trying to prove it but the book doesn’t prove it at all. XD It actually dismantles it’s own idea in the process. Exhibit B; another paragraph about two pages later when it talks about the salem witch trials :
“ Unfortunately, that meant accusing a number of young women who ranked much lower than him in the strict social hierarchy of being in league with Satan. The reasons why family, neighbours and acquaintances were accused have been debated many times over the centuries. Fear and paranoia played their part, but so did financial exploitation. In these close-knit communities, many people were related to each other and an accusation of witchcraft was a convenient way to bypass a line of inheritance. The misogyny of the period ensured a son never accused a father. Accusations of witchcraft were a way for societies to control what they viewed as ‘disruptive’ female behaviour. What often started as an opportunistic way of getting a woman out of the way became a cultural contagion with little or no rational explanation. “
Little to no rational explanation my butt.
Reasons : 1) women are social and care what others think, thus blaming other women/girls in order to solve whatever social problem they had. Fairfax’s daughters wanting their fathers attention. 2) The book LITERALLY said what I explained; financial exploitation. “Someone is in the way.” 3) Misogyny isn’t a direct causation or reason why sons never accused fathers. Both sons and daughters could inherit things from their families. As I’ve said with reason 1, women are social. Men care more about objects. Boys grow up caring about different things. It’s not about “does dad like me” but rather “does dad recognise my strength? Have i earned his respect?”. Very different things.
4) witchcraft wasn’t a direct reason for controlling uncontrollable women. Yes, it was an easy way to TRY and physically grasp control of that which was uncontrollable at the time ( plagues, smallpox and other diseases the english brought, famine , hostile Indians , religious upheaval, a block for financial gain, and yes, even people who did not follow their religious way of life. People who acted outside of what was considered good. Why was it a lot of women and girls and less so men ? See reason 1 and 2. ). Killing someone because of witchcraft gave a physical control and a means to an end to the problems which were not only physical problems but social upheaval issues as well. They didn’t have medicine. People didn’t know germs thrived in dirty water. Boiling water wasn’t a thing. Puritans who lived in England and now moved to America are dealing with a very different soil and crop types.
Don’t need this book.
I was so frustrated just reading it because whoever wrote it clearly lacks any logical thinking and just has a vendetta for people hating women and men doing everything blah blah blah. I doubt JK Rowling would be proud of this book at all.
I saved myself a lot of time by not continuing reading this crap.