Kwame Dawes’s “Nebraska: Poems” arrives with the modesty of a license plate slogan and the patience of weather. The book begins under the wry, disarming epigraph – “Honestly, it’s not for everyone” – and proceeds to behave as if it believes that line not as marketing but as a principle of form: no rush, no dazzle, no plea to be liked. Dawes, a poet with a long and various career, has written a collection that treats place not as scenery but as discipline, not as backdrop but as a pressure system. Nebraska is not an idea to be solved here; it is a set of conditions – light, flatness, distance, winter, the public silence that can feel like mercy and like threat – under which the self must keep speaking, or at least keep trying to speak without lying.
The title promises the familiar pleasures of regional writing – the hearty local detail, the pastoral lift, the affectionate inventory. Dawes offers something stranger and, in its way, more accurate: a portrait of a life conducted in the wide-open, in which openness is not freedom but exposure. The poems are alert to how a landscape can empty you out and how, in that emptied state, you begin to notice what you were too busy to hear elsewhere. This is a book that understands attention as an ethical act. It does not “make a case” so much as keep returning to the scene of perception, asking – with the steadiness of a person who knows the question will not be answered – what it means to witness without turning witness into performance.
The collection is divided into three sections – I, II, and III – a plain architecture that feels almost deliberately unliterary, as if Dawes is wary of giving the reader the comfort of an ornate map. The first section functions as an arrival narrative, but not the romantic kind. Arrival here is not a homecoming; it is a recalibration. In “How I Became an Apostle,” the voice introduces itself with a sly grandeur that is immediately undercut by the reality of daily life. An apostle, in these poems, is not a saint or a hero but a person tasked with carrying testimony in the most ordinary possible setting – an immigrant body in a Midwestern town, a mind trying to find language that does not flatter itself. “Advent” and its neighboring pieces feel tuned to beginnings – October light, first winter, the slow conversion of the body to cold. Dawes is good on the way the weather teaches you to live differently: how winter turns the simplest errands into negotiations, how it changes your sense of time, how it makes you measure yourself against endurance rather than ambition.
And yet the poems are never only meteorological. The weather is a method. It becomes a way of thinking about the conditions under which certain kinds of lives are lived and certain kinds of histories are preserved – or erased. In “The Immigrant Contemplates Death,” the immigrant consciousness is rendered not as a political category but as a private, incessant calculus: where one’s vulnerability sits in the body, how it changes from day to day, how it is mirrored by the landscape’s refusal of intimacy. Dawes resists the explanatory gestures that many readers have come to expect from poems about migration or racialized life. He does not annotate himself for a presumed audience. Instead, he gives you a speaker who is simply there, in the place, in the season, in the nation, and who must make a life from that fact without turning the fact into a lesson.
This refusal of the lecture is one of the book’s strengths and, depending on the reader, one of its frustrations. “Nebraska: Poems” is not built for extraction. Its best effects accrue. Dawes’s lines often move with a long-breathed syntax – sentence after sentence that seems to be thinking itself into being, accumulating clauses the way a mind accumulates its day: observation, doubt, memory, the sudden prickle of fear, then the effort to return to the ground of what can be said plainly. You can feel the poet’s preference for the unshowy phrase, the phrase that stays close to experience rather than vaulting toward metaphor. This is not a collection that hands you quotable aphorisms every few pages. It is a book that asks you to read at the pace of a person walking in winter, each step a small insistence.
If Section I is the book’s arrival, Section II is its widening – the moment when private perception begins to admit the full pressure of public life. The titles alone suggest a shift in weather: “The Epoch of Lies,” “In These Times,” “Sniper,” “July Fourth.” If the first section is attentive to the moral geometry of place, the second is attentive to the moral weather of a nation. Dawes does not date his poems with headlines, yet the atmosphere is unmistakably contemporary. We live, after all, in an era in which the public language is constantly being worn down – the slow corrosion of shared facts, the way repetition can turn a lie into furniture. “The Epoch of Lies” reads less like a political statement than like a description of the air one breathes – a recognition that falsity is no longer an event but a climate. Dawes’s gift is to show how a climate enters the body: how it changes your posture, your tone, your willingness to trust your own perceptions.
Here the collection brushes, quietly but unmistakably, against the present’s familiar anxieties: the fatigue of constant crisis, the way outrage can curdle into numbness, the difficulty of sustaining attention without burning out. Dawes does not write protest poems in the declarative mode; he writes poems in which the very act of speaking becomes fraught. The voice in these pages is alert to the way political language can become performative, how righteous urgency can start to resemble the very spectacle it claims to oppose. There is an implicit critique here, not of activism itself but of the contemporary temptation to mistake intensity for clarity. Dawes’s poems choose a different ethic – a slower one, a more precarious one – in which the work is not to proclaim but to keep seeing.
In “Sniper,” violence appears not as a singular shock but as an ambient possibility, one more element in the emotional landscape. The word carries its own contemporary dread, and Dawes uses that dread sparingly, refusing sensationalism. The effect is more chilling than a dramatic scene would be. It resembles the way gun violence has been metabolized in American life – a constant background threat that shapes behavior even when it does not manifest. “July Fourth,” too, is a poem that understands ritual as a kind of national self-hypnosis. In recent years, the country’s celebrations have become sites of dispute, grief, and competing narratives. Dawes’s poem does not argue; it observes the tension between the nation’s story and the nation’s reality, the way fireworks can look like beauty and sound like warning depending on what your body has learned to fear.
If these concerns call to mind Claudia Rankine’s “Citizen” or Natasha Trethewey’s “Native Guard,” it is not because Dawes is writing in the same mode. Rankine’s work is famously sharp, a knife of form. Trethewey’s is elegiac, historically granular. Dawes is doing something quieter and, in its way, riskier: he is writing into the space where the political is not a subject but a condition. His poems do not frame themselves as interventions. They frame themselves as lived time. In this, “Nebraska: Poems” resembles a book like Tracy K. Smith’s “Life on Mars” in its sense that the personal and the public are braided at the level of perception – or Ada Limón’s “The Carrying,” with its emphasis on the body’s intimate reckonings. There is also an older lineage hovering behind Dawes’s plain speaking: William Stafford’s Midwestern patience, Elizabeth Bishop’s exacting attention, even Charles Reznikoff’s “Testimony” in its commitment to witnessing without adornment. Dawes, however, has his own cadence, a voice that often feels like it is refusing to be a voice – refusing to become a brand.
Section III turns inward again, but not as retreat. It is the book’s bodily reckoning – the place where attention is tested by fragility. “On Blindness,” “Insomniac,” “Transplant,” “Surviving, Again,” “Ambulation,” “On Picking Battles,” “Before Winter” – these titles read like a chart of endurance. The body in this section is not romanticized. It is not made heroic. It is simply present, with its betrayals and its limits. In a cultural moment saturated with narratives of resilience – the tidy arc from suffering to redemption – Dawes’s refusal of triumph feels bracing. He does not allow illness to become instructive. He does not allow survival to become virtue. He describes what it is like to live in the aftermath of bodily certainty, when time is no longer a clean line but a series of repetitions: sleepless nights, slow walks, the careful management of energy, the dull knowledge that some things do not improve but only become familiar.
There is a poem late in the book, “Before Winter,” that functions as a kind of coda, and it is here that Dawes’s long-line method comes fully into view. The poem moves with the pace of a mind trying to keep hold of itself in the face of fatigue, letting images arrive – backyard light, a dog pausing, the sky’s watery blue – and then letting them open onto the larger anxieties that cling to any quiet moment: “the betrayals of body and love and earth,” the machinations of power, the knowledge that winter will come. The poem does not resolve these pressures. It gathers them. It suggests, without stating, that gathering may be the only honest form of consolation available – not the false comfort of a lesson, but the real comfort of having named what is there.
This is the book’s essential method: it does not save you; it stays with you. In an era when our attention is constantly being monetized and shattered, when the self is asked to perform its feelings on demand, Dawes offers a collection that is almost aggressively unoptimized. It is not built for virality. It is built for rereading. That is a compliment, but it is also a note of warning. Readers who want compression, who want the quick electrical pleasure of lyric brilliance, may find themselves restless. Even sympathetic readers may feel the collection’s mood settle into a sameness. Dawes’s restraint, admirable as it is, sometimes risks flattening his emotional range. There are moments when the long line begins to feel like a habit rather than an inevitability – when you sense the poem could have benefited from a sharper turn, a more surprising formal risk, a willingness to let silence do more of the work.
And yet the very steadiness that can read as monotony is also what gives the collection its moral weight. “Nebraska: Poems” is, among other things, a book about limits – the limits of the body, the limits of language, the limits of empathy, the limits of how much public catastrophe one can metabolize without breaking. “On Picking Battles” names, in its title alone, a contemporary condition: moral decision fatigue, the daily triage required to remain ethically awake in a world that constantly demands reaction. Dawes’s poems do not pretend that the self can be infinitely responsive. They suggest that a sustainable ethics may look less like constant outrage and more like disciplined attention – the decision to keep looking, even when looking does not lead to action or relief.
If the book has a flaw, it is that its virtues are sometimes too consistent. Dawes’s refusal of spectacle, his avoidance of rhetorical fireworks, his ethical modesty – these qualities create a collection that is deeply trustworthy and, at times, slightly underpowered. One wishes, occasionally, for a moment of formal rupture, a poem that risks ugliness or strangeness, something that would break the book’s careful poise and remind us that witness can also be violent, that the mind under pressure does not always speak in measured cadences. The book is so committed to its own discipline that it sometimes feels as though it is holding something back – not in the sense of withholding truth, but in the sense of refusing emotional extremity even when extremity might be warranted.
Still, to read “Nebraska: Poems” is to encounter a writer who understands that the truest drama may be the drama of continuance. Dawes’s Nebraska is a place of wide skies and long distances, yes, but it is also a place where the self learns to live inside time’s repetitive demands. The book’s politics are not slogans but atmospheres; its ethics are not declarations but practices. It belongs in conversation with the contemporary works that have tried to render the psychic cost of living now – the erosion of truth, the normalization of violence, the exhaustion of constant crisis – but it does so with an insistence on slowness that feels almost contrarian. It asks the reader to accept that there may be no catharsis, no epiphany, only the daily work of attention.
In that sense, “Nebraska: Poems” is a book that meets the moment by refusing to mimic it. Our era rewards speed, certainty, performance. Dawes offers duration, doubt, restraint. The effect is not always dazzling, but it is often profound. The collection’s best poems do not announce themselves as best; they stay in the mind like weather – a pressure you notice only when you step outside and realize you have been living under it all along.
If I were assigning it a number, the book lands at 81 out of 100: a serious, admirable collection whose cumulative power is undeniable, even if it sometimes resists the sharper pleasures – compression, surprise, lyrical peak – that would push it from accomplished to undeniable. What it lacks in immediacy it makes up for in integrity. It is a book that does not beg for devotion, but it rewards it – slowly, stubbornly, like winter light on a flat horizon.