Critical Annotation Project
Primary Text: Free Enterprise by Michelle Cliff
Research Question: I would like to further investigate how Cliff uses the formal features like form and language to create plurality within history and to (re)construct the lives of her characters. I am especially interested in her creation (or discovery) of ‘woman warriors’ and how she constructs them in the text.
Secondary Text: Ghostwriting Transnational Histories in Michelle Cliff’s Free Enterprise by
Erica L. Johnson.
(Re)Searches: When searching, I always like to be intentionally vague. It leaves room to uncover the unexpected. It’s especially helpful when you’re not sure what you’re looking for. I started with what interested me the most about the novel (1) how it’s written, (2) the use of mythology and (3) woman warriors. I tried Jstor first just because it’s the database I am most familiar with and has always produced good results. Below are those that appeared most fruitful-
Jstor -> ‘free enterprise’ -> ‘free enterprise michelle cliff’ -> The Art of History -> Fluidity Without Postmodernism -> Add ‘mythology’ -> Front Matter -> Add ‘women warrior’ -> Michelle Cliff and the Authority of Identity
Then when I didn’t stumble across anything that sounded good enough from browsing the abstracts I tried
Project Muse.
Project Muse -> ‘Michelle Cliff Free Enterprise’ -> Ghostwriting Transnational Histories -> ‘michelle cliff free enterprise mythology’ -> ‘feminism Michelle Cliff’ -> Gendered legacies of Romantic Nationalism -> Configurations of Caribbean History
A lot of the results were either book reviews or interviews with the author, ultimately unhelpful. There were also lots of results that featured other works by Michelle Cliff such as No Telephone to Heaven. Unfortunately, the first article I got really excited about, Reconfigurations of Caribbean History: Michelle Cliff’s Rebel Women, focuses on Cliff’s novel Abeng.
Summary:
Johnson begins with a quote from Nada Elias, Trances Dances and Vociferations: Agency and Resistance in Africana Women’s Narratives. The quote explains that in many disciplines, such as the sciences and poetry, there is a certain amount of guesswork involved. However, only in the histories of women and other marginalized characters is that guess work considered fiction. Johnson follows this epigraph with several quotes from Cliff herself, showing artistic intent and establishing an objective view for the novel. She owns that she had to invent a certain amount of material but likens her piece to Toni Morrison’s Beloved, “she uses on historical event but re-imagines it (Johnson, 115.)”
Johnson then opens her argument that Cliff’s novel and others like it, are actually a form of ghostwriting. She then gives two major points towards her argument. The writers use real but poorly documented subjects and uses literary strategy to flesh out their histories. Secondly, the writers use archival material as referents and shape their narratives to serve historical truth (Johnson, 116.) Specifically, in Free Enterprise, the character of Mary Ellen Pleasant is being fleshed out. There is evidence that she somehow participated in the raid of Harper’s Ferry but she is excluded from the ‘official’ history. Johnson explains these types of historical figures as the ghosts present in history, like the ghosts present in Morrison’s novels. Cliff creates Mary Ellen’s story and in doing so “works as a novelist, historian, and biographer, a combination that produces a framework specific to the genre of ghostwriting (Johnson,17.)”
According to Johnson, Cliff uses many writing strategies and strategies of representation to mold the collaboration between her artistic license and existing documentation of Pleasant, placing Pleasant into a pluralized history. She does this by playing off of undeniable truths in history, ie events, figures and artifacts.
Her first point that “Cliff draws on the adjacencies of various colonial contexts throughout the novel” focuses specifically on the ghosts left behind from slavery. Ghosts are created by violent or criminal acts because violence is often purposely forgotten. The winners tell the tale and the conquered become the haunts of history. Thus by pairing Mary Ellen with the character of Regina, Annie Christmas, she shows the adjacencies of Jamaica and the U.S., (117) two places connected by the slave trade. Pleasants life is shaped by her struggle against ‘the trade’ and those that joined her in stories of resistance (118.) For example, Annie Christmas, Marian Adams, Malcolm X, all make appearances in the novel entering into a give and take with Pleasant showing what one life can lend to another. The lives of her friends and acquaintances not only root her within history but help remember her story through dialogue and letters. Integrating Mary Ellen’s story in with others, showing a wider background of resistance (123)
Cliff further integrates Pleasants story into history through the insertion of historical artifacts such as JMW painting of the Zong and the Shaw Memorial. “The novel presents a powerful pair of visual allegories of historical (re)construction (123) JMW Turners painting and the Shaw Memeorial- connects characters to history. “The thing is behind us. Surely we can enjoy the art it engendered (124.)” “the pronoun “we” is not universalizing but rather encompasses divergent perspectives (124.)” Shaw memorial- sculpt the likeness of missing men
Johnson summarizes the ‘official’ historical information on Pleasant claiming that Cliff bases “her depiction of Pleasant on letters and newspapers from San Francisco’s city achieves and on the unpublished autobiography Pleasant dictated to a ghostwriter in her later years (Johnson, 121)”
This point argues for her main point that Free Enterprise is ghostwritten by proving her point that the story is not all based in Cliff’s imagination but holds similar to history.
Enlarges relationship between Annie and Mary to intgrate Mary into ‘a global mechanism of resistance (125)” – letters
Oral storytelling
Leper colony, dangerous bodies (127) “Cliff also draws on the lotif of plague, quarantine, and contamination in order to invert the very notions of ostracism and marginalization (128), characters share a contaminated space knowledge, mutial understanding
Cliff creates a multi-history, listening to the voices of ghosts and conjectures, then weaves Mary Ellen’s story throughout. Dialogic nature/storytelling, epistolary, historical narration
Insertion of historical artifacts
“a book about the black-centered struggle for emancipation, a struggle which for the most part has been excised from the official record… (120)”
“Cliff ‘rescues’ Brown (131)132 sitaution her character through historical evidence
“This margin -to-center strategy (133.)”
Does not claim to be the one, undisputed history, but rather creates pluralization within history. Quotes Wendy Walters, it is the natural will to take fragments and create something objective and whole- but there too many stories, too many histories for that to be an option (119) –lending to Cliff’s form, gaps, jumpy, switches.
Critical Response:
One of the main draws from this text is that it creates a discussion of Cliff’s work with that of Morrison, which we read earlier in the semester. Johnson draws similarities that I had not before thought of. Morrison and Cliff both come at their subjects through a form of recovery (or rememory), re-imagination and invention. Johnson discusses historical ghosts, people like Mary Ellen Pleasant and those affected by the middle passage that through the crime and violence of marginalization have been forced out of the ‘official’ history. Also, smaller, less obvious similarities like the theme of ‘falling apart.’ The characters of Beloved all share the experience of falling apart as do the lepers in Cliff’s novel. Holding with the integration of these similarities I would also pull in Beloved as source material for my research paper.
Johnson uses many sources that I would like to explore further. For instance, Nada Elia, Traces, Dances and Vorciferations: Agency and Resistance in Africana Women’s Narratives, Wendy Walters, and NourbSe Philips. I think it’s important when analyzing Cliff to put her into perspective with other authors opinions and their strategies of representation.
I agree in full with the article. This is easy because like Free Enterprise itself the article doesn’t make any sweeping claims, if you agree that the novel is a form of ghostwriting it is hard not to also agree with her main claims: that Cliff uses undeniable facts like people, events, and artifacts to place her characters into history and that she uses strategies of representation such as dialogue, a historical narrator and letters to re-imagine and create a pluralized history.
It is also hard to dispute Johnson because she uses Cliff herself abundantly. In the beginning saying, “No one is more articulate about Michelle Cliff’s work than Cliff herself (115.)” and following with a plethora of quotes on the novel and how it works. There’s no way to argue with an author on their intent.
Johnson also uses full advantage of indisputable truths in her article.