What do you think?
Rate this book
时尚的哲学
齐奥尔格·西美尔同马克思、韦伯并称为现代资本主义理论三大经典思想家。他对金钱和货币不厌其烦的耐心剖析，对大都市现象学式的揭露，对日常生活碎片般的展示，都给人非同寻常的思想体验。本书是西美尔的文集，他的一贯主题、片段风格、暧昧行话、理论气质和哲学性情，在书中都表露无遗。
312 pages, Paperback
Published September 1, 2017
About the author
Georg Simmel
481 books232 followersGeorg Simmel was a major German sociologist, philosopher, and critic.
Simmel was one of the first generation of German sociologists: his neo-Kantian approach laid the foundations for sociological antipositivism, asking 'What is society?' in a direct allusion to Kant's question 'What is nature?', presenting pioneering analyses of social individuality and fragmentation. For Simmel, culture referred to "the cultivation of individuals through the agency of external forms which have been objectified in the course of history". Simmel discussed social and cultural phenomena in terms of "forms" and "contents" with a transient relationship; form becoming content, and vice versa, dependent on the context. In this sense he was a forerunner to structuralist styles of reasoning in the social sciences. With his work on the metropolis, Simmel was a precursor of urban sociology, symbolic interactionism and social network analysis. An acquaintance of Max Weber, Simmel wrote on the topic of personal character in a manner reminiscent of the sociological 'ideal type'. He broadly rejected academic standards, however, philosophically covering topics such as emotion and romantic love. Both Simmel and Weber's nonpositivist theory would inform the eclectic critical theory of the Frankfurt School.
Simmel's most famous works today are The Problems of the Philosophy of History (1892), The Philosophy of Money (1907), The Metropolis and Mental Life (1903), Soziologie (1908, inc. The Stranger, The Social Boundary, The Sociology of the Senses, The Sociology of Space, and On The Spatial Projections of Social Forms), and Fundamental Questions of Sociology (1917). He also wrote extensively on the philosophy of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, as well on art, most notably his book Rembrandt: An Essay in the Philosophy of Art (1916).
Simmel was one of the first generation of German sociologists: his neo-Kantian approach laid the foundations for sociological antipositivism, asking 'What is society?' in a direct allusion to Kant's question 'What is nature?', presenting pioneering analyses of social individuality and fragmentation. For Simmel, culture referred to "the cultivation of individuals through the agency of external forms which have been objectified in the course of history". Simmel discussed social and cultural phenomena in terms of "forms" and "contents" with a transient relationship; form becoming content, and vice versa, dependent on the context. In this sense he was a forerunner to structuralist styles of reasoning in the social sciences. With his work on the metropolis, Simmel was a precursor of urban sociology, symbolic interactionism and social network analysis. An acquaintance of Max Weber, Simmel wrote on the topic of personal character in a manner reminiscent of the sociological 'ideal type'. He broadly rejected academic standards, however, philosophically covering topics such as emotion and romantic love. Both Simmel and Weber's nonpositivist theory would inform the eclectic critical theory of the Frankfurt School.
Simmel's most famous works today are The Problems of the Philosophy of History (1892), The Philosophy of Money (1907), The Metropolis and Mental Life (1903), Soziologie (1908, inc. The Stranger, The Social Boundary, The Sociology of the Senses, The Sociology of Space, and On The Spatial Projections of Social Forms), and Fundamental Questions of Sociology (1917). He also wrote extensively on the philosophy of Schopenhauer and Nietzsche, as well on art, most notably his book Rembrandt: An Essay in the Philosophy of Art (1916).
Ratings & Reviews
Friends & Following
Create a free account to discover what your friends think of this book!
Community Reviews
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review
October 3, 2026
Georg Simmel’s The Philosophy of Fashion is often read only as a commentary on clothing and trends. Yet to me, it reveals the living three‑fold Taiji rhythm inside all human social movement.
Fashion turns in an endless spiral: the desire to belong, the urge to stand apart, and the nameless collective current that carries both. This is the three‑way play — conformity, distinction, and the whole — exactly the working of the Tao. Nothing stays fixed; every style rises, peaks, yields, and returns in new form.
Simmel sees that we are not merely consumers of fashion. We are channels through which social energy flows. We reach for new forms not only for outward show, but because the spiral inside us matches the spiral of the world. Rigid attachment to any single style or identity will break; soft awareness of the flow lets us move gently with it.
Fashion is never only “clothes”. It is a small mirror of existence itself: opposites feed one another, old becomes new again, and meaning unfolds not from static rules but from the living movement. To understand fashion is to see the three‑fold Taiji quietly turning everywhere in human life.
Fashion turns in an endless spiral: the desire to belong, the urge to stand apart, and the nameless collective current that carries both. This is the three‑way play — conformity, distinction, and the whole — exactly the working of the Tao. Nothing stays fixed; every style rises, peaks, yields, and returns in new form.
Simmel sees that we are not merely consumers of fashion. We are channels through which social energy flows. We reach for new forms not only for outward show, but because the spiral inside us matches the spiral of the world. Rigid attachment to any single style or identity will break; soft awareness of the flow lets us move gently with it.
Fashion is never only “clothes”. It is a small mirror of existence itself: opposites feed one another, old becomes new again, and meaning unfolds not from static rules but from the living movement. To understand fashion is to see the three‑fold Taiji quietly turning everywhere in human life.
Displaying 1 - 1 of 1 review