A note about spoilers: I tend to avoid them in my book reviews, instead opting to discuss things in more general terms. That said, in the bottom part of this review I do paraphrase some dialogue from one of the major characters. I don’t believe that this spoils anything, and I use it only to support my point (hence no spoiler tags), but I wanted to be clear and upfront about it to anyone reading.
I have read several of Simon Archers novels in the past, usually, they tend to fall under the fantasy/magical genre, have a harem (or multiple love interests exclusive to the protagonist/harem), and generally have some kind of ‘Chosen one’ element thrown. It’s a fairly successful formula for any of these ‘rapid writing authors’ and tends to work well for them. So I was very surprised when a 'post-apocalypse title from this author popped up on my kindle feed, enough that I decided to get it.
Overall, I tend to enjoy Simon's stories. As a rule, I find his writing is passable, and while his editing is typically in the 'needs work' category, his story concepts and ideas are very good. So understand that I went into 'After the Virus' expecting more or less, the same levels and standards.
The Good:
As for the story itself, it was refreshing for me to see a survival-based story where there is not some supernatural element (at least as far as the reader knows). While the early book is a little slow, it is so in a good way. Forrest (the MC) acts intelligently, behaves believably, and generally handles the situation with realistic actions/reactions based on his knowledge and backstory.
While the first 30-40% of the story is very much narrow focus on his home and planning for future survival, the latter parts see the story open up to include a wider area and larger situations that are far more complex than 'food' 'shelter' 'safety'. As a survival story, it doesn't make too many mistakes (except perhaps the predictable and over-used villain trope near the end).
The Bad:
Now we get to the main issue I have with this story and why I will not be continuing with the other 2 (at the time of review anyway) books.
It's the attitude of the main love interest. I say main because, like so many other Simon Archer books, there is more than one. Within a few days of them meeting (and burying their respective loved ones) the MC and love interest become an item. Almost immediately (and casually) they discuss how they shouldn't expect to be exclusive.
"I won't be jealous if you won't" kind of talk, and "We have to repopulate, and we will each need multiple partners but I want you to be the father of my first child"..... (I am going from memory).....
Either way, the 'Free Love' motif, and its subsequent justification by the main love interest, is not only factually wrong (biologically speaking), it also makes the far greater mistake of detracting from the likability of the characters. Never mind that they seem to reach this decision fast enough to give someone whiplash (in between declarations of love and marriage type talk)... yeah…
Conclusion:
For me, the whole “Open relationship / sharing / having babies with other people” point critically detracts from the otherwise decent story as it makes me care little about the main characters in the present or their potential future. I think this story would have been much better without this element. (So much so that I am dropping the series after book 1 and will be far more cautious with purchasing Simon Archer books in the future).
If your someone who doesn't care about this particular issue, you will find a decent enough story, with a slightly overused villain trope and human survivors who are for the most part sane, human beings. All put together in a generally believable scenario and consequently a decent enough way to spend a few hours reading.