I was unfamiliar with Derek Bok, but came across this book when browsing the audiobooks available through the library and thought it sounded interesting. I'm interested in ideas for improving Higher Ed and thought I might find valuable insights in the writings of someone who spent decades as the president of Harvard. In short, I was unimpressed. I felt like the entire book could have been better if condensed into a single article, and even then it would not have offered me any compelling, novel, or particularly interesting insights.
I am a career educator and soon to complete a doctorate in education (EdD). On the surface, a book like this should be most useful for people like me, because we often go on to hold leadership positions in colleges and universities. But I found nearly nothing new or uniquely useful in the ideas Bok presents about what students can and should learn in college, the challenges of changing engrained practices and systems of academia, and possible new policies that may lead to improved student learning outcomes, life readiness, and engaged citizenship. He suggests that his ideas might be perceived as "revolutionary" but to me, many of them came across as undeniably incremental and non-disruptive.
I have known educators much older than me who seem to be much more in touch with the experiences, perspectives, and culture of today. In my view, Bok makes many assumptions that are not up to date with what the professional consensus of leading professionals in higher ed learning. I thought the section about the (weakly defined) "conscientiousness" was unhelpful at best, and affirming of systemic prejudice at worst. Bok is a proponent of strict deadlines for homework assignments, teachers who trust university systems to deal with students who plagiarize, and faculty that demonstrate their commitment to student learning with harsh grading systems, all topics deserving more nuance and critical attention than given in this book. He seems truly out of step with the times when he discusses the potential of higher ed teaching happening through "the videodisc and the Internet" though I'm pretty sure that that DVDs will be about as common in the tools of future professors as vinyl records. He regularly refers to students of color as "minorities." In discussing future job opportunities, he largely ignores the tech sector. He also doesn't adequately address the changes in higher ed populations over the decades and how those changes great influence the needs of students today. For example, he says that students spend no more than 26-28 hours a week on their classes and homework, and suggests that the remaining hours are "too valuable" to be spent entirely on "eating, sleeping, and recreation," as if a large percentage of today's undergraduate students do not spend considerable time working to be able to pay their tuition and meet their basic human needs.
Should Bok write another book, I would encourage him to do so in collaboration with say, a millenial who has just become a college president. I imagine Bok has wisdom that can benefit a new generation of university leadership, but I don't think it was effectively shared here.