I have become a fan of the recent trend in ornithologists writing books summarizing a certain group or adaptation of birds in a fashion that is both specific and scientifically accurate, as well as palatable by the general public who may know nothing of the subject or perhaps just have a loose interest in it.
I think Brooke covered the basics of seabird behavior and life well, and I enjoyed that he referenced a multitude of specific papers to further support his points. One thing I would like to point out, though, is that many of the examples focus on species that breed in Europe, and though he used a decent number of referenced papers for a 200-page book, it was quite easy to notice that he reused a lot of the same authors (how many times did I see Weimerskirch cited?). While it's fine to reference particular authors a multitude of times due to either the cutting-edge character of their work or due to their credibility, I know for a fact that there are many, many other reputable authors out there contributing to the wealth of seabird research. I can see why he did so, but it didn't fail to escape my notice, and seemed ... dare I say ... lazy.
Brooke's writing style was the perfect blend of entertaining and informative for me. I can see how someone expecting a Weidensaul-esque chatty, yet scientific, nonfiction piece could be disappointed. But, for me, that was just fine. The more information, the better. I didn't like, however, when Brooke decided he suddenly wanted to randomly include a very select few snarky comments in the form of footnotes. I hated this, actually. Why, when the entire rest of the book had a fairly serious tone, do this only a few times, then never again? If you're going to write a chatty scientific piece, then write it. But waffling a bit (and randomly so) just took the gravity away from his tone. Brooke is talking about some pretty serious subjects in this book - and ones that I, who have worked with seabirds for multiple biological field seasons, truly hold dear to my heart - and ones that the public do not fully recognize completely; the switch in moods is simply aggravating.
Overall, though, the discussion of all of the aspects of 'being a seabird' were handled very well. He did a good job of depicting a general idea of the life histories of a variety of groups of seabirds that - to be completely honest - aren't that similar. I would have liked for him to talk more about behavioral differences between different species (not just in foraging tactics), like in courtship displays and chick rearing.
One thing Brooke could have gone into more detail on, though, is how climate change is affecting seabirds. This topic was addressed at the end of the book and was rushed (about 4 pages covering climate change and seabirds, whereas about 15-20 pages devoted to seabird feeding tactics and adaptations).
I really would have loved for Brooke to have an even stronger, more abrasive agenda. Here is a man who has worked with seabirds for most of his life and is respected and credible: why not use this opportunity to fully stress that things in our current world need to change. There was a hint of it, but honestly, not nearly enough. If you're going to stand up for something, why do it half-heartedly? That's just a waste of everyone's time.
Complaining aside: loved the book, loved the information, would recommend this to anyone who has even a slight interest in seabirds. For those complaining of a serious, too scientific tone - a little science is good for you, it doesn't always pay to read fiction every day.
PEACE.
Jojo