Galarte deep-dives on Chicano/a/x transness, and the dialogues between those identities and the larger culture(s) they're situated in.
The first two chapters can be a tough read because they deal with the murders of two different trans women, Gwen Araujo and Angie Zapata, and how the courts media flattened their narratives in the wake of their deaths. Galarte carefully interrogates the court presentation and media coverage of both deaths, and contrasts them with more interpersonal and internal readings. He also examines how the courts and media positioned Angie Zapata's murderer as a threatening Chicano man – macho, gangster, etc. – robbing him of any queer identity or complication, and assigning him a narrative as the repulsive immigrant "other." The stereotyping in courts and media coverage enforced racist anti-Latinx narratives while purporting to honor and protect Angie Zapata's memory.
The subsequent chapters look at the Chicana/o/x butch/FTM "borderlands," in particular the ways in which certain Chicana feminist writers have policed the borders of butchness and Chicano-ness against trans men. The final chapter is a reading of the ways that Chicano trans men disrupt gender binary notions of Chicano masculinity and mainstream trans narratives.
Intersectionality is kind of a buzzword, but this book is a good example of how expansive a deep intersectional reading can be. In choosing a specific focus on Chicana/o/x identity, I think Galarte proves something about the granular being universal. While in some ways these readings are extremely specific to a Chicana/o/x trans experience (with a primary focus on binary transness), Galarte provides a roadmap for readings of how cultural identity and gender interact and refract. I'm not Chicana or Latina but this book still hit pretty hard and between reading sessions I found myself having a lot of ~interesting~ thoughts about gender. (Also, at one point Galarte pulls a very hot quote about "machoness" from Richard Rodriguez's "Next of Kin" – "machoness" is a cultural quality, not a gendered one – that resonated and made me really interested in Rodriguez's book. Galarte introduced me to all kinds of stuff I want to read! I'll probably forget most of it because my reading list is so long, but still! An academic who makes you want to read more is doing something right, you know?)
The writing is very academic, but once you wrangle some of the jargon (or even imbibe it – sinthome and the particular reading of "dolor" are really nice), the ideas underneath are nuanced and interesting. The book also exposed me to some new writers, books, and artists who I wouldn't otherwise have known about.