Well. This woman is a good and engaging writer.
But this book is an ode to colonialism. Wilson goes on and on about the "Indians" she's "saving", talks ever so highly of "mountain men", and is a part of the system of residential schools. Uses the word civilization way too much. Most importantly, views everything uncritically through a colonist eye. It's heartbreaking to read. I know she hasn't got bad intentions, but it's painful to read her infantilizing of the Indigenous people she's serving as a nurse. It's hard to hear uncritical descriptions of convincing Indigenous people to allow themselves to be flown to Edmonton's Camsell Hospital. It's hard to read uncritical descriptions of residential schools. It's hard to read this and see how anyone could walk away with a simple "it's an adventure tale of this amazing brave nurse in the wild untamed North." Untamed. Uncivilized. Immoral. She refers to Indigenous people's beliefs as superstitions. She praises the transformation of young Indigenous boys at residential school into city gymnasts. She confidently and unabashedly describes fooling and/or coercing Indigenous people into taking medicine they don't want by promising more rations or family allowance. And in the same brash voice describes some of the Indigenous health complaints as "imaginary". It's devastating to read about the epidemics of European diseases sweeping through northern camps and communities. Wilson describes her role of helping immunize, administer penicillin and so on, acknowledging that the people did not have immunity built up to these diseases, without any real acknowledgement that she was a part of the infiltration of communities and the culture that brought these diseases.
A particularly heartbreaking bit quotes a young Indigenous girl discussing having gone to the cinema and seeing a "cowboys and Indians" movie. The girl says "All the Indians got killed. Some boys behind us laughed. Clara and Mary and I laughed too."
Moments of insight are too few and too far between and too clouded by the colonist lens, like this one, "The old Indians clung to these customs and beliefs. The young people seemed torn between loyalty to their Elders and what they had been taught in the mission schools. It was a period of transition not easy for anyone."
If you must, you might argue she is merely a product of her time and the book reflects that, having been published in 1965. I don't accept that, and I certainly don't accept that the publisher republished this book in 2019 with no disclaimer, no corrections (except an inaccurate note stating that "Eskimos" are "now called Inuit"), no prologue examining the books's colonialist-saturated view.