Jemielniak and Przegalińska bring to life the topic of the Collaborative Society - a matter that has been sweeping the academic and business world for a long time. Of course, the concept itself concerned mainly the more broadly defined issues of Collaborative Economics, as well as other related topics - such as sharing economy, sharing media, peer production, etc. Nevertheless, the concept of society, which would create a common form, collaborating in order to achieve the merits defined as the state of the relative economic equilibrium of all the individuals that compose it - was featured in the works of many authors before.
What is crucial in the study of Polish authors is a fairly broad analysis of the topic. The authors resort to presenting not so much academic discourse on the subject, but rather a reference of certain academic assumptions to the functioning economic world. This way of contemplating is supported by a collaborative ideology in the spirit – or rather ideology in action - which, unfortunately, in my opinion, sometimes disturbs the flow of the book. By this, I mean an exaggerated emphasis on the [in their opinion], a badly functioning economic system, and a strong implementation of a critique of the overall model of the sharing economy as a model using individual components as the pawns in a corporate game. The object of criticism is, therefore, the 'capitalism', which in its description brings to mind more corporatism in the spirit of the Portuguese Estado Novo.
However, I do not want to delve into the ideological discourse, because the subject of analysis itself is so interesting that, regardless of philosophical stances, one can draw common conclusions about what a collaborative society looks like and what it might look like. The conclusions of the so-called long-term perspective can be significantly different, because, both the authors of this book and I guess some of you, will be addressing the revolutionary potential – or rather the potential of change - towards an economy resembling a social economy ‘collaborative’ in a philosophical sense; closer to the unification of society; and for people with my philosophical perspective, this future stands out as a potential for transferring economic responsibility onto individuals to such an extent that more and more often state governments and corporations - grown on cooperation with such - will be forced to make radical movements and, consequently, lose control over the fruits of the creation process in the long term.
What I liked the most about the book was, first of all, the attention to the collaborative potential of individuals. The chapter on hacktivism gives examples of activities that may have eluded many observers of political life in the world, but which were crucial for the development of the Internet and maintaining freedom in the world. Paying attention to the fact that most of the economy today depends on the virtual world, which, in turn, has crowds of users capable of stopping and starting entire processes - as mentioned, for example, in the context of Polish protests against ACTA - is still only a drop in the ocean of future virtual activities in that regards. The majority of larger countries invest a lot of money in the development of cyber units responsible for potential activities in the virtual world. Importantly this does not mean that they will be able to dominate this surface. The collaboration of users from all over the world can counteract any state interference in this field.
On the other hand, the last chapter deals with many issues related to the development of technology and its impact on human life in general. It is an excellent contribution to reflecting on how our perception of reality will change with the development of new technology. Our thoughts on the political or economic aspects of reality are dictated by the realities in which we live. When the way in which we interact with our environment changes - or any other process that is considered basic or subconscious today turns out to change with technology advancement - consequently our perception of a problem will also adapt or change. It may seem that our political thought, understood as the philosophy of power distribution, can in such cases evolve.
Overall it is a pretty good book on an extremely interesting and up-to-date topic. I am not a huge fan of the ideological discourse of the authors, but I certainly like the attempt to deal with the thorough idea of collaboration in the virtual world.